First off, let me apologize to all the reasonable people in the thread. I promise this will be my last tangential post. If, despite all common sense to the contrary, someone feels compelled to argue with me further I will simply ignore it. (So this is your chance to "get in the last word" and "win" the argument if you're incapable of restraint.)
Dude seriously you have no life what so ever. How long did it take to write that?
I forgot to time it, but I'll be sure to set the stopwatch for this one so you can draw whatever conclusions you see fit based upon the time required to type this. Also, I apologize for not responding to you earlier. I was busy having no life.
Were you sitting at your computer all pissed of typing away?
Nope, sorry. The biggest problem you face is that, rather than annoying me, you're actually entertaining me. I relish the opportunity for "vigorous disagreement". Ever hear the one about wrestling with a pig in the mud?
Do people in your life say you argue to much?
Nope. There are people who say that, but I don't consider them to be "in my life". Just as you clearly have no respect for what I say, there are people who's opinions simply don't matter to me.
How many times did I say roots growing out of the ground to get to mist is AEROPONICS.
Well as everyone knows it takes 62,400 repetitions to make one truth. You're way off, so for the moment it makes absolutely no difference how many times you've said that roots growing out of the ground is aeroponics. Saying it, even dozens of times, doesn't make it true. Get back to me when you've said it almost sixty-three thousand more times and we'll see how much you've changed the rules of science.
Again, yes I agree, indoor growing hydro/aero is better than 90% of nature, but we learned what we know from nature. We will never be able to replicate the entire echo system that is nature.
Echo system? Ecosystem perhaps? And yes, much of what we've learned has come from nature. However, to imply (as you have) that our understanding will never allow us to exceed what we have observed is fundamentally false.
We pick and choose the variables that are practical and cost effective that provide the best results. That is it, But in no way will we ever comprehend the entire complexity of what mother nature is doing.
If you want to sell yourself short, be my guest. I, however, don't believe that it's remotely intelligent or constructive to decide what your limitations are before you meet them. Invariably you'll meet limitations where you expect them, regardless of whether that's where they actually are.
I don't believe it is impossible for mankind to understand mother nature. It may and most likely will be exceptionally difficult. But hardly impossible.
But if you believe you can't do it then you're absolutely right.
I was probabaly growing advanced hydroponics before you knew that plants need water. I have a firm grasp of hydroponics. You have 38 posts and no gallery. I am curious to what makes you an expert?
Ah, the e-peen argument. "I've been in location X longer than you, thus I am smarter, stronger, handsomer, and have larger reproductive organs than you."
Perhaps we should, on the count of three, each say how long they've been doing hydroponics, and then we'll know who's the smartest. Because, as everyone knows, the most accurate measure of IQ is the date they began growing plants hydroponically. A close second is the number of photographs of hydroponic plants they've uploaded to specific forums.
You know what? I'm comfortable marking this one as a loss. We'll call this a big "win" for cloudflyer. You can tell all your e-friends you've got a bigger e-peen than I do. You'll get all the e-tail. It'll make you e-smart and e-right.
I'm e-finished e-arguing with someone who's e-obsessed with my e-peen.
(total elapsed time 11 minutes 48 seconds, as if that were remotely important)
Again, I apologize to the sane people and return you to your normally scheduled programming.