A 21-year-old who's refusing to pay back her student loans compares her cause to Rosa Parks' fight

TBoneJack

TBoneJack

Well-Known Member
Last edited:
D

deadgro

Well-Known Member
TBoneJack said:
http://www.businessinsider.com/mallory-heiney-writes-in-the-washington-post-she-isnt-paying-back-her-student-debt-2015-3

This dumb bitch has the audacity to compare her fight against a student loan (which she signed, took the money, and spent it) is on the level to be compared to what Rosa Parks did.

The bitch signed the loan, spent the money, and now wants us taxpayers to pay back her loan for her.

2 words to consider before taking out a loan and then spending the money: BUYER BEWARE.
Click to expand...
21 year olds say stupid shit.. Just take a look through this site.
 
TBoneJack

TBoneJack

Well-Known Member
shishkaboy said:
Those schools are scams. She might have a case.
Click to expand...
She might have a case against the school...but not against us taxpayers.

She should pay back the loan to the bank, like she AGREED to do. And if she can prove the school was a farce, then let her collect from the school. NOT from us taxpayers.
 
TBoneJack

TBoneJack

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
L2sentance structure prior to calling someone a dumb bitch imo.
Click to expand...
TBoneJack said:
I'm high baby...cut me some slack on sentence structure...I fixed it up a bit...
Click to expand...
Sorry, @abondonconflict...should I have said sentance structure? Like you did?

Moral of the story: Don't make petty criticisms. You never know when they will show how human you are. :):):)

And YES, I know I'm human. I make mistakes. We all do.
 
Last edited:
shishkaboy

shishkaboy

Well-Known Member
TBoneJack said:
She might have a case against the school...but not against us taxpayers.

She should pay back the loan to the bank, like she AGREED to do. And if she can prove the school was a farce, then let her collect from the school. NOT from us taxpayers.
Click to expand...
I dont think you understand the con. The school takes most of the money and the rest is spent in on college expenses. Maybe she nets a small amount but the school is responsible. I remember a story about one of those schools recruiting the homeless, by getting them to take out massive student loans with the promise of a weekly stipend.
 
TBoneJack

TBoneJack

Well-Known Member
shishkaboy said:
I dont think you understand the con. The school takes most of the money and the rest is spent in on college expenses. Maybe she nets a small amount but the school is responsible. I remember a story about one of those schools recruiting the homeless, by getting them to take out massive student loans with the promise of a weekly stipend.
Click to expand...
She took out a lawful loan by signing her name on the dotted line. Then she spent the money.

Maybe she spent the money unwisely. I don't know. But I know this: even if she burnt the money in a fireplace, she should pay it back. She borrowed it and spent it. She's responsible for the money AND for being stupid to spend it at a fake college.

She should pay the loan back. Her MAYBE being ripped off by the college is a completely different matter, and should not cause me (the taxpayer) a damned dime.
 
shishkaboy

shishkaboy

Well-Known Member
The school has the money, It was spent on books and tuition. That's how student loans work, you can only spent the money on school stuff. After everything is paid then the school then gives a refund check to the student.
It goes straight to the school and they take theirs and if there is any left over, you get your loan refund.
 
TBoneJack

TBoneJack

Well-Known Member
shishkaboy said:
The school has the money, It was spent on books and tuition. That's how student loans work, you can only spent the money on school stuff. After everything is paid then the school then gives a refund check to the student.
It goes straight to the school and they take theirs and if there is any left over, you get your loan refund.
Click to expand...
I get what you're saying.

But the dispute is between her and the school. Not between her and the lender. The relationship between her and the lender is clear cut: a loan was made, and a repayment plan was signed. Very legal. And very binding.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
TBoneJack said:
I get what you're saying.

But the dispute is between her and the school. Not between her and the lender. The relationship between her and the lender is clear cut: a loan was made, and a repayment plan was signed. Very legal. And very binding.
Click to expand...
If the economic benefit to society was greater by not paying back the loan, would you support not paying it back or support paying it back on principle even though it might be worse for society?

Hypothetically speaking
 
TBoneJack

TBoneJack

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
If the economic benefit to society was greater by not paying back the loan, would you support not paying it back or support paying it back on principle even though it might be worse for society?

Hypothetically speaking
Click to expand...
Wow man. Really good question.

I would prefer the outcome to be the greater for society. But I believe the best society we can have is one where people are expected to carry their own weight, and to be responsible for the legal agreements they make.
 
see4

see4

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
If the economic benefit to society was greater by not paying back the loan, would you support not paying it back or support paying it back on principle even though it might be worse for society?

Hypothetically speaking
Click to expand...
I would still support her paying it back. The macroeconomic system will quickly recover, but lessons learned for this poor nitwit will stay with her for the rest of her life. Dumb bitch should pay back her loan.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
TBoneJack said:
Sorry, @abondonconflict...should I have said sentance structure? Like you did?

Moral of the story: Don't make petty criticisms. You never know when they will show how human you are. :):):)

And YES, I know I'm human. I make mistakes. We all do.
Click to expand...
I'm not the one who made a thread about a "dumb bitch".
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
see4 said:
I would still support her paying it back. The macroeconomic system will quickly recover, but lessons learned for this poor nitwit will stay with her for the rest of her life. Dumb bitch should pay back her loan.
Click to expand...
What's your opinion about the bank bailouts?
 
S

spandy

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
If the economic benefit to society was greater by not paying back the loan, would you support not paying it back or support paying it back on principle even though it might be worse for society?

Hypothetically speaking
Click to expand...
She pays it back, because that's what she agreed to do.

If somehow this is a negative for society, then burn it down because that society is fucked if an individual must yield what is owed to them because its somehow better for everyone else that they do no receive payment.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top