I get it now, still not accurate as again, potassium is not the strongest bond in coco..if unbuffered, yes, it will be present in highest amounts with sodium and will cause issues, but if buffered, calcium and magnesium will bond to cec sites more so than potassium will..so potassium will leech out faster than calcium or magnesium would! Short C&P......You're absolutely right. I even typed in potassium when I searched it. Not sure why I keep saying phosphorus lol.
Anyhow, if you swap them out, that's what I mean and the rest stays the same.
If the coco coir cation exchange complex is not buffered, the positively charged cations applied to the plants, such as calcium and magnesium, will have a stronger attraction to the coco complex and become unavailable to plants (nutrient lockup), while potassium and sodium, less attached to the complex, will be displaced, come into solution and be taken up by the plant instead of calcium. This leads to all sorts of crop problems - from excessive salt uptake by roots to calcium deficiencies, which is something growers wish to avoid at all cost.
Buffering coco prevents all this since in buffered coco coir, the cation exchange sites have already been occupied by calcium while sodium and potassium have been washed away.