Wait, people who served on the Abe have some sort of special integrity?
A Cruise Missile Slammed Into the Pentagon on 911
- Thread starter Martin Timothy
- Start date
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
For the simple,....Fuel injected or Radial engines, Fuel injected/Radial is too complex,....I apologise. Again !i
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
What truth have I stretched? The last time a Boeing jetliner flew past its limits it broke up in mid flight. Speed on a passenger jet is max 313 knots just for bird impact protection on takeoff, that doesn't mean it can go max speed. The top speed of 610 MPH is the speed at 30K altitude if exceeded will cause breakup. There is so much more drag at sea level that the top speed is seriously reduced. Even my little Bonanza flies 30% faster at altitude than it does at takeoff and it flies max 18K feet. Dynamic pressure is proportional to speed, so if there is 25 pounds of pressure per foot at 100 MPH at sea level, then there would be 100 Pounds of pressure at 200 MPH, and at 500 MPH it would be about 625 Psf. Dynamic pressure is what the speed pitot reads. The airliner cannot go as fast as they say, they are using the deceptive "Airspeed" and not the ground speed when they give those numbers.
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
And no, MIT stated MPH, not KT`s because they used several methods.
That plane was flying straight and level, there is a video. in 2 frames the "plane" moves approx 200 meters. The frames are at 30 ft/second standard CCTV. Indicating a more reasonable speed of about 400MPH maximum.
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
tobinates559
Well-Known Member
so thats your arguement? the titanic sunk so 9/11 is no conspiracy?? makes sense......
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
Nope, just the ones on 911, oh and a 727 that crashed into lake Michigan way back in '65. That would be all.
tobinates559
Well-Known Member
what about building 7 man? why did that one fall? no plane hit that building! once again confronted with facts the little boys try to post a funny to distract from real points
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
WTC 7 wasnt hit by a plane. this is true.
it WAS hit by thousands of tonnes of flaming rubble falling from 1200 feet up.
maybe that had something to do with it.
nah.
musta been Dem Jews.
also, if your comment hadnt been rambling disconnected tweakeresque word salad, i would not have responded in kind.
keep it logical and rational, or you can resume arguing with the voices in your head.
tobinates559
Well-Known Member
ok so tell me when the last time a building completely collapsed due to flamming rubble falling on it?? o yeah its never happened because thats impossible!
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
took 30 seconds to prove the impossible to be Possimpible
and that rubble wasnt even on fire.
tobinates559
Well-Known Member
answer these questions for me please...
why didnt NORAD scramble jets and intercept the hijakced flights when they had the time to do so?
why was there a massive amount of put options placed on united and american airlines right before 9/11?
why didnt NORAD scramble jets and intercept the hijakced flights when they had the time to do so?
why was there a massive amount of put options placed on united and american airlines right before 9/11?
tobinates559
Well-Known Member
HAHAHA
took 30 seconds to prove the impossible to be Possimpible
and that rubble wasnt even on fire.
ok so first off this is a log cabin! and it seems to have been destroyed by a rockslide of sorts? and it wasnt really rubble at all you see that boulder three times the size of the SUV? try again that one made me laugh though i really cant believe you posted that
Officially, all the air traffic confused NORAD so they weren't sure who was who because they were having drills that day and the drills were about hijacked planes. So in essence the pilots thought the real thing was just training. Same with NORAD.
