A Libertarian speaks out on Obama and the possibilities ....

chuckbane

New Member
Study history, look for pattens, keep a sense of humor and fire up a bowl.

:peace:
That deserves some +rep

Reading something out of a book, does not necessarily make it so.
+rep 4 u 2 MedMan!

god I wish more people took this seriously. Its like all the shitheads who post links to sites claiming bullshit.

Like that johnnyorganic claiming that 80% of homophob's are homosexuals themselves. I called him on it and he posted a link for some crock of shit. Like I could make a website claiming that all homosexuals are women trapped in a mans body,, but that doesn't necessarily make it true.

take everything you read/hear with an absolute grain of salt

and a shot of tequila~ :twisted:




Think for yourselves people


:peace::peace:

Edit: Sorry MedMan, I can't give you more rep until i "spread it around".. I'll hit you as soon as i can :D:D:D
 

wannabe grower

Well-Known Member
Again, to reiterate, you will NEVER hear the name Sarah Palin again as it relates to government outside of Alaska. Unless it's about something the Republicans will release in a press statement now that the election is over. I can't truly believe that you really think you will, as you seem like a fairly bright person overall.
 

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
god I wish more people took this seriously.
Nobody takes you seriously. You keep us laughing with your antics. Our own Canteen Boy.

Watch out for the Scoutmaster. LOL!
http://www.truveo.com/Canteen-Boy/id/1523987437
Its like all the shitheads who post links to sites claiming bullshit.

Like that johnnyorganic claiming that 80% of homophob's are homosexuals themselves. I called him on it and he posted a link for some crock of shit. Like I could make a website claiming that all homosexuals are women trapped in a mans body,, but that doesn't necessarily make it true.

take everything you read/hear with an absolute grain of salt

and a shot of tequila~

Think for yourselves people
Who are you calling a shithead? LOL!

Why are you trying to fight a battle on one thread you previously lost on another?

You never refuted that source.

It's hilarious because you asked for the source and I gave it to you. Clearly, you were not expecting that. You then tried to attack the source, but you never disputed the facts derived by the university research listed by the source.

You quibbled over one word in the topic sentence. I seriously doubt you even bothered to read beyond it.

I'm still waiting for that refutation, by the way. :fire:
 

wannabe grower

Well-Known Member
I find it funny also that no one seems to bring this up...Obama is a Black Man!! Oh my!! That alone is enough to make some people around the world think twice about the USA. I know some people want to "act locally", but not many seem to want to "think globally". You all aren't on this planet alone you realize. The fact that a black man got elected by more middle class, college educated, WHITE, folks than even Bill Clinton should say something. It also throws a lot of other repressed countries around the world on their collective ears. The populations of these countries will see this election in various ways, one of which will doubtless be, "if that country can go against everything we've been told about it... THEN SO CAN WE!" It also mobilizes the black community in this country to know that they can be whatever they wish instead of picturing themselves as the down-trodden. Human nature will set in eventually and some will become complacent, but those that put forth an effort will find themselves better off than they were previously. Barack Obama's Presidency can only be looked at as a positive over the long run of history, even if he were to turn out to be the worst President ever. Which, by the way, I don't think will turn out to be the case.:)
 

chuckbane

New Member
Nobody takes you seriously. You keep us laughing with your antics. Our own Canteen Boy.

http://www.truveo.com/Canteen-Boy/id/1523987437

Who are you calling a shithead? LOL!

Why are you trying to fight a battle on one thread you previously lost on another?

You never refuted that source.

It's hilarious because you asked for the source and I gave it to you. Clearly, you were not expecting that. You then tried to attack the source, but you never disputed the facts derived by the university research listed by the source.

You quibbled over one word in the topic sentence. I seriously doubt you even bothered to read beyond it.

I'm still waiting for that refutation, by the way. :fire:
There is no refutation. Some people were raised to "hate fags", your census is invalid.
 

chuckbane

New Member
No refutation. Just as I suspected.

Anyone wishing to see a know-it-all get his ass handed to him may go here:

https://www.rollitup.org/spirituality-sexuality-philosophy/93383-about-homosexuality.html
I just gave you my refutation.

You got nothing, just accept it.

My ass handed to my by a website that some random guy made making wild and unfounded claims?

I dont think so johnnyboy :blsmoke:

I know from life-experience that there was a whole generation raised to "hate fags". Not to mention all the hardcore religious folk that fill the midwest and south!
 

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
Gee John, I must admit you do seem to know a lot about Homosexuality.
The Scoutmaster appears.

Are you making a pass at me? :o

I know a lot about quite a few things. I know a lot about forestry, but that does not mean I am a tree.

EDIT: NWB edited his post to add this. Fair enough. Here is my EDIT response:

You will never beat my man Chuck no matter how hysterical you get.
Hysteria is not required to do that as I demonstrated quite unambiguously.

You are a joy to behold with your 'Left always good, Right always bad' mindset. A hyperpartisian yippy dog. YouTube - Yippy Dog

You never disappoint with your stupid little taunts and catcalls from the peanut gallery.

It is obvious you do not know the definition of hysterical. I suspect it is a word you heard someone else use. You figured it was perjorative because it was used by an ally against an opponent. Perhaps you could provide an example of my hysteria with an explaination justifying your erroneous label of my responses. I'm not really expecting a response, but I thought I would ask.

Need I remind you of exactly who started this thread-inappropriate dickdance?
I just gave you my refutation.

You got nothing, just accept it.

My ass handed to my by a website that some random guy made making wild and unfounded claims?

I dont think so johnnyboy

I know from life-experience that there was a whole generation raised to "hate fags". Not to mention all the hardcore religious folk that fill the midwest and south!
Your own words say different.
There is no refutation.
If you want to discuss this issue further, take it back to the original thread, Canteen Boy.
 

chuckbane

New Member
The Scoutmaster appears.

Are you making a pass at me? :o

I know a lot about quite a few things. I know a lot about forestry, but that does not mean I am a tree.

Your own words say different.

If you want to discuss this issue further, take it back to the original thread, Canteen Boy.

nice edit: wow you love to manipulate it. Edit your post after i reply,, thats cool.


Is this what you got?

hahahaa WOW

Unlike our young hotshot know itall JohnnyO(as he signs his name while leaving neg rep) I use my life experience to learn things.

He reads bullshit articles and believes them and then has the nerve to post his bullshit findings as if they were a fact.


Here is a study done by me.

the high majority(i am not going to use a bullshit % as there is no way of calculating a percentage for this topic, as our smartass johnnyO should know) of people claiming that homophobs are usually gay, are in fact gay themselves!!! Wrap your mind around that!

And why do they claim this? So they have an easy way out to saying that they are not gay because of course they are not a homophob.

Cause sure as shit no homophob would claim that. You see the delectable twist in this?

Just to show you ANYONE can make ANY claim. Doesnt necessarily make it tru


and your edit

Keep waiting. The Scoutmaster will be along any minute, Canteen Boy.

If you you want to discuss the Homophobia issue, I'll meet you at the appropriate thread. I posted it previously. See you there, CB.
then stop playing dodgeball and post the link!
 

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
Thanks for giving me credit for leaving my name.

We're not discussing Homophobia here. This thread is about Libertarians. Post #46 has the link.

Why are you afraid to go to the appropriate thread and continue the debate, CB?

It's because you got stomped.

Keep your ears plugged and saying to yourself, "LA la la la la la la la la!"


EDIT: Damn Chuck. For an internet badass, you sure are a crybaby. The previous edit was inadvertent not intended to be deceitful. I sure didn't mean to hurt your feelings. You made a couple of timely edits yourself, but you don't see me bitching about it.

If you were not so quick on the draw, there would be no problem. I'm confident your significant other echos my sentiment.

You want an edit? Here ya go Chuckles. This one is not so innocent.

Cheers!
WAH!

JohnnyOrganic is being mean to me!

He makes me feel stupid using logic and sourcing with actual evidence.


It's not fair!
 

chuckbane

New Member
Thanks for giving me credit for leaving my name.

We're not discussing Homophobia here. This thread is a about Libertarians.

Why are you afraid to go to the appropriate thread and continue the debate, CB?

It's because you got stomped.

Keep your ears plugged and saying to yourself, "LA la la la la la la la la!"
I guess thats the end of intelligence.

Thanks for your time

:eyesmoke::mrgreen::eyesmoke:

:peace:
 
Top