According to the DEA....

Dinosaur Bone

Active Member
According to the DEA..... within a month of trying cannabis for the first time, you are a full blown Junkie shooting Heroin and/or Meth. They represent this as a FACT.

So explain to me how in the fuck anyone manages to grow and harvest a crop?? Assuming that you were to plant a seed, the very same day you try weed for the first time..... if you are a full blown meth and/or heroin junkie laid out on the floor in your fell apart house, and interested in nothing else.... before your plant is even ready to put to flower... Exactly how hell does anyone manage to bring a plant to full term??? And how has the cannabis specie of plant life managed to survive at all??

I guess weed pharmers don't sample, or in any way touch the product because it is that dangerous :???::???:
 

Heisenberg

Well-Known Member
Same question could be asked of meth labs. How would junkies preform chemistry? The guys who run the labs are smart evil terrorists just exploiting the addicts. And as everyone knows, to the DEA cannabis is the same as meth, so the same propaganda can be applied.

Kinda similar to how, in my state at least, the punishment for hash is much greater than raw cannabis. With alomst all other drugs, more potent = more dangerous, but when the drug has an LD50 that is impossible to ingest, danger isn't really any issue.
 
The DEA is run by ultra conservative religion wing-nuts that want to police the actions of adults. Seriously. The people that get into Law Enforcement are usually very conservative by many standards, and they believe they know what is best for others. Pathetic individuals trying to do God's work.

And if you believe I am just hating on religion just to hate, you're wrong. Their arguments are very much funded through their religious beliefs and tied with the morals and values a country should hold.
 

Dinosaur Bone

Active Member
The DEA is run by ultra conservative religion wing-nuts that want to police the actions of adults. Seriously. The people that get into Law Enforcement are usually very conservative by many standards, and they believe they know what is best for others.
Actually, their violation and disregard for Republican Core Principles makes them RINO's. Knowing whats best for others, and applying Big Gov'ment Gone Wild laws & programs to the problem would make them Progressives.
 

43Hitman

Active Member
Actually, their violation and disregard for Republican Core Principles makes them RINO's. Knowing whats best for others, and applying Big Gov'ment Gone Wild laws & programs to the problem would make them Progressives.
Very well said and right on the money. +rep.
 

GreatwhiteNorth

Global Moderator
Staff member
The DEA is run by ultra conservative religion wing-nuts that want to police the actions of adults. Seriously. The people that get into Law Enforcement are usually very conservative by many standards, and they believe they know what is best for others. Pathetic individuals trying to do God's work.

And if you believe I am just hating on religion just to hate, you're wrong. Their arguments are very much funded through their religious beliefs and tied with the morals and values a country should hold.
I don't believe the DEA makes policy - it enforces policy at the whim of the president/congress.
If you're going to hate on somebody I would start there.
 
Actually, their violation and disregard for Republican Core Principles makes them RINO's. Knowing whats best for others, and applying Big Gov'ment Gone Wild laws & programs to the problem would make them Progressives.
A group of individuals is represented not through its beliefs and mission statement, but rather their actions. To what degree do today's Republicans at all make an attempt to actually follow what the meaning of the word conservative once was? This is a group of individuals tied together by their schemes regarding religion and their attempts at protecting freedom, though the freedom is only relative to themselves. The core principles have changed over time, and hoping they'll go back one day is something that will not occur in anyway. While I agree that many initiatives taken my progressives can be out there, they are mainly the individuals that make an attempt to provide the utmost personal freedom to others in many cases. On an economical platform, I don't agree with them.

I don't believe the DEA makes policy - it enforces policy at the whim of the president/congress.
If you're going to hate on somebody I would start there.
The DEA has a lot of power when it comes to actually influencing policy. These individuals are on the front-line, and their reports along with the personal biases affect legislation regarding drug policy and enforcement issues. Wasn't it recently that the DEA won the right to put a GPS system on your car without a warrant? And hasn't it been the DEA, regardless of medical marijuana laws, that continues to raid them and shut them down? And 8 or 9 former heads of the DEA have come out and spoken against Prop 19 vehemently as well. Whether they were created to do some specifics things is one thing, but what they actually do at the end of the day and how they continue to contribute to the problem is completely another and the reason why I oppose them. And there is no single list of ranked priorities when it comes to marijuana -- and hopefully one day total drug -- legalization. They must all be fought off at the same time. Pointing one finger and playing the blame game won't work. Point all fingers, then play the blame game.
 

Dinosaur Bone

Active Member
A group of individuals is represented not through its beliefs and mission statement, but rather their actions. To what degree do today's Republicans at all make an attempt to actually follow what the meaning of the word conservative once was? This is a group of individuals tied together by their schemes regarding religion and their attempts at protecting freedom, though the freedom is only relative to themselves. The core principles have changed over time, and hoping they'll go back one day is something that will not occur in anyway. While I agree that many initiatives taken my progressives can be out there, they are mainly the individuals that make an attempt to provide the utmost personal freedom to others in many cases. On an economical platform, I don't agree with them.
There is disingenuousity in both parties. And both parties should get back to their roots, and throw out their filth. I wouldnt mind voting for a Democrat, or a Republican IF a real one actually existed. And hopefully, this candidate exists in my district... so I dont have to move someplace else to vote for them.

Back On the Original Topic.. If the propaganda about becoming a full blown, non-functioning herion addict were at all true ... How in the hell does a marjuana plant ever get grown to its full amber trichome coated glory?? The full blown heroin addict of DEA myth, would have nothing more in their garden than a few dried up, and dead seedlings. IF they even mange to recieve their seed order, and plant the seeds by the time they are full blown junkies.
 
Top