And what does that tell you?
I'll address this below with the rest of your argument on the point.
Then you'd know that as soon as you alter a production technique you risk altering the certification requirements. And you'd be able to correctly answer the argument you make below (as I do below). Which means either you don't know how the certifications work as well as you think you do, or you deliberately choose to ignore the obvious answer for some reason.
This is faulty reasoning. If you look at Tarantula you can see it's basically a bacterial supplement. I don't know a hell of a lot about how you go about making a bacterial supplement, but I'm quite certain it differs significantly from making a liquid organic nutrient. Because they're COMPLETELY different products. No doubt the criteria to OMRI certify Tarantula are significantly easier to meet than they are for actual fertilizers. Hell for all either of us know there is some integral step in the process AN uses that OMRI refuses to certify simply because it doesn't have a 10 year study to prove it doesn't violate organic standards or some crap. It's not a simple matter to get something like a nutrient certified by OMRI if you do anything more than shovel manure into a bag.
It could be something as stupid as certain machines being used to bottle both the organic and inorganic lines. Unless you actually know why they don't have an OMRI certification you're jumping to conclusions.
This just reinforces the point that it's undoubtedly far more complicated or even completely impossible to qualify for OMRI for the nutrients.
You know what makes infinitely more sense than sitting around making ridiculous, unfounded claims about why someone you don't know did something? Asking.
We might not get a straight answer, but it will no doubt be a better answer than jumping to a conclusion based on incomplete information and a mistaken belief in the personal understanding of a certification process we have no first-hand (or second-hand) experience with.
I'll send an email and let you know what I learn.
The problem with your points, and again I mean no offense, is that you're not reinforcing anything except a bunch of tired ass excuses from nutrient companies. I'll answer your first question with a picture if you don't mind...
And what does that tell you?
It tells me that that's you standing in line. Lmao. Except the sign says "BIGGER YIELDS" or something....
See, that was exactly my point. I said you're repeating the same tired ass excuses that everyone else does about AN and nutrients that don't meet OMRI guidelines. You're not repeating it because you just happened to think of all the same excuses everyone else does...it's because you see and hear them constantly I imagine.
I mean you really don't believe that ALL THESE OTHER NUTRIENT COMPANIES with OMRI labels on their organic fertilizers are better than AN do you? Because you can't really make the argument that AN is organic, and then make the argument that they can't get a certification because it's too hard to get a cert for organic fertilizers lol. Not if all these smaller companies can do it.
Hell, Larry from GO used to say he didn't believe in organic certs and that was why the GO nutrient line wasn't OMRI...then he started saying that it was because there were "secret formulas" he didn't want anyone to see or know...including OMRI apparently. And now they have OMRI labels on several products, but NOT THEIR NUTRIENT LINE.
See how it started out as a believe. Then it changed to a secret formula reason when they decided they wanted certs on some stuff.
It could be something as stupid as certain machines being used to bottle both the organic and inorganic lines. Unless you actually know why they don't have an OMRI certification you're jumping to conclusions.
It's not ok for them to use the same machines to process organic and non organic lines lol. That's absolutely not ok and you're right, it would be a great reason for them to not get a cert. My point again, if they could get them they would. Do you realize how many conversations like this there are on the internet from these forums now? I'm pretty sure if a cut throat company like AN could get certs on their organic line they would, and deep down you know it as well.
And you're right, I am making conclusions. Not jumping to them though, and not making them alone, or overnight. I've done a lot of research, tried the company out, got extremely ripped off because it's been almost a year and they refused to give me my money back for the products I shipped back, did some more research lol...and came to conclusions. No jumping though, I'm disabled.
An already sells there nutrients at an extremely high price, I think we can both agree with that, high yields or not right? Ok, and Bio Canna also sells their nutrients for a high price as well right? Well, Canna's Bio line is all OMRI, and they've had to jump through all kinds of hoops to get some of those products into the US, but they do it. And that gives them the right to tell people that their product is safe and organic. Because they take the extra measures, and go the extra mile, and do the extra research...and buy the extra machines if cross-contamination of nutes is an issue. AN has that right as well, but they are lying. But they have the right to lie I guess lol.
Let me know what you learn if they reply to the email though. I'm glad we are having a nice conversation by the way. Very civil, it's refreshing.