mydixiewrecked
New Member
so phil, are you pretty much just going to use this account now?hell yea!!! +rep for you sir...show me your "O" face!!!
so phil, are you pretty much just going to use this account now?hell yea!!! +rep for you sir...show me your "O" face!!!
I don't spend much, if any time trying to convince people not to use whatever brand of nutrients they're using. Unlike some people. I just share my knowledge and experience with people when and where it seems relevant. You want to try Advanced Nutrients? Great. You don't? Fine, no skin off my nose.
Just ask yourself, what has the more questionable motive: the guy who says "here's what I've used, what I've experienced, take it or leave it as you see fit" or the guy who seems to have a massive axe to grind with the first guy and spends an inordinate amount of time trying to tear down one particular brand of nutrients and promoting another?
What knowledge have you shared other than plugging specific products? How can one apply that 'knowledge' to their own grows should they be using a different plant food?
So you're encouraging people to spend hundreds and hundreds of dollars on a grow and I'm saying one doesn't need to in order to get great results. Now I'm the shady one?I'd love to see a grow journal of yours, where are they?
i just want to thank my boys for showing me that advanced nutrients is a quality nutrient. it has grown killer plants for me and my friends. i also want to thank my friends for showing me that even a new grower like myself can grow nice, healthy plants without burning the shit out of them while using advanced. and lastly...i want to thank my common sense for showing me that advanced isn't really that expensive when you factor in how concentrated it is.
on a side note i want to send much love to my intelligence for letting me know how to weed out the bullshit from the actual good advice and those trolling. thanks again everyone.
to be totally honest i like that AN markets to weed growers and runs tests with weed cause i find it hard to believe that every type of plant you grow takes the same nutrient ratio's to grow top notch. how else to make your nutes the best for weed unless you test it on weed? makes sense to me. dyna gro says its meant for orchids so it does make sense that AN outperforms it on marijuanatheres different threads for nutrient debates. give it a rest guys, tree has made his choice for nutrients. stop making claims about people working for nutrient companies, just because someone approves of the product they use doesnt mean they work for the companies.
and AN is the only company that tries to market to the pot heads really, there a select few but AN is one of them and due to that, they mark up their prices a bit(and im sorry but they do promise some things that their nutes, or any nutes simply cant acheive such as 400% larger yields). i couldnt see dyna hiring someone to advertise their product on a forum like RIU, that would give them a bad reputation. i currently dont use either of these nutes but this debate happens on here like 50 times a day, and you guys made your point like 2 pages ago.
to be totally honest i like that AN markets to weed growers and runs tests with weed cause i find it hard to believe that every type of plant you grow takes the same nutrient ratio's to grow top notch. how else to make your nutes the best for weed unless you test it on weed? makes sense to me. dyna gro says its meant for orchids so it does make sense that AN outperforms it on marijuana
i also agree with nuglets. i am totally happy with the concentration rates of AN and i dont even think its expensive. if you use every single additive than it can get expensive but you dont have to use every single additive to have great results i just use 2 or 3
i posted those pics yesterday so pretty much nothing knew. il take more pics in like a week. still gotta chop down the rest of my crop too ive been busyyo tree. couldn't agree with you more. well said. what have you been up to? how are the girls?
to be totally honest i like that AN markets to weed growers and runs tests with weed cause i find it hard to believe that every type of plant you grow takes the same nutrient ratio's to grow top notch. how else to make your nutes the best for weed unless you test it on weed? makes sense to me. dyna gro says its meant for orchids so it does make sense that AN outperforms it on marijuana
i also agree with nuglets. i am totally happy with the concentration rates of AN and i dont even think its expensive. if you use every single additive than it can get expensive but you dont have to use every additive to have great results i just use 2 or 3
Thank you once again HB for saving me hundreds of dollars on AN bs Marketing my girls are on day 21 and look incredible with just dyna gro GRO AND TAP WATER!!
Hr on my flood table I'm using 3 gallon smart pots with roots coco which has a lot of perlite but was wondering where I should start my ppm I'm using dyna gro gro and pro tekt? Starting from rooted clone
....in my experience i have liked using bontaicare and house and garden, ...
could someone please tell me why a post i made last night got deleted? i was responding to crazyhazey and i typed out a long post where i made some good points about why i use AN i dont understand why its gone
I'm actually testing H&G's aqua flakes right now. The base is reasonably priced and decently concentrated so it actually winds up being one of the most economical plant foods that I've ever used. H&G's aqua flakes is 20% more concentrated than Connoisseur and DG is 85% more concentrated. Given the fact that Aqua Flakes is cheaper than DG and DG is much more potent, it's actually a wash in the end with both being about the same price to run start to finish.
I'll post some pics at day 60 just so you guys can see how plants look because if you're going to 'test' a plant food, you need to use it for longer than 17 days.