Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Take note of who is giving good advice and who is not when listening to the talking heads. This is a good time to look back and recall what those "experts" said about the pace of this investigation. As Tangerine pointed out, there may never be another case that is as complex or filled with so many unprecedented events as what happened during and after Trump's presidency. Most of the so-called experts got the reasons for the pace of the investigations wrong. Not only is now a good time to review the worth of the "expert's" advice, now is also time to take stock of what one's self has said. People who were saying that the DOJ is going too slowly in the pace of investigating Trump's many crimes might now take note that their fears were not realized.Posting the debate going on in the legal community by informed pundits helps to educate people on the issue and stimulate discussion, the whole point. Many of the experts I've posted speak of these things and caution required too. However, on the documents and obstruction case it is pretty clear cut and I personally believe many of the complaints have been addressed by Jack's appointment. There has been a marked change in tone from most of these pundits including Lawence Tribe since Jack came on the scene and the elections are over. I tend to follow the consensus of experts in the field as well as educate myself on the law and how it is suppose to work. The Trump years shook people's faith in many things, including the rule of law, I'm glad to see it is returning to normal. If it works like it did back in previous scandals, there are a lot of people in deep trouble when they start turning over rocks and following the evidence. 2023 promises to be an interesting year and the only thing left is if Donald will make it through this year without being indicted.
I put my opinions out there and at times later events show I fell short of the mark. I owned it when I called it wrong regarding Putin's invasion. I owned it when I realized that I completely underestimated the level of support Trump had in 2022. My admissions of ignorance weren't acts of self flagellation, they motivated me to dig for more information, some of which you and others on this site provided. So thanks for that.