DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Yep, looks like Donald is cracking up as he goes down!
All these things you imply the government should provide. Remind me a whole lot of China and North Korea and Russia and even Canada to a large part. And every single thing the government takes away they take from the people. Simply put I don't agree with the distribution of wealth.Wanting smaller government correlates tightly with the sort of libertarian ideology that opens doors to fascism.
It is identifiable by a triad of policy aims:
small government
deregulated markets
low taxes
which, when followed to their logical end, means eliminating social aid to the poor and disabled, freeing corporations to overcharge for everything while preaching the bullshit of trickle-down, and eliminating the republic’s immune system against frankly undemocratic movements like maga, the Klan, and dominionists.
Incompatible with any recognizable hippie ideal. They were about compassion, in stark contrast to libertarians.
The Libertarianism-to-Fascism Pipeline | National Review
If libertarians have a pipeline for kooks, it is probably because they have some non-mainstream views.www.nationalreview.com
and I disagree with the implied social Darwinism, red in tooth and claw.All these things you imply the government should provide. Remind me a whole lot of China and North Korea and Russia and even Canada to a large part. And every single thing the government takes away they take from the people. Simply put I don't agree with the distribution of wealth.
I see they found yet again more classified material concerning Biden. I wonder how many of these documents might be Ukraine or China related?
It looks like you know as much about China, North Korea, Russia and Canada as you do about your own country.All these things you imply the government should provide. Remind me a whole lot of China and North Korea and Russia and even Canada to a large part. And every single thing the government takes away they take from the people. Simply put I don't agree with the distribution of wealth.
I see they found yet again more classified material concerning Biden. I wonder how many of these documents might be Ukraine or China related?
Why not wait till it all comes out rather than speculate?All these things you imply the government should provide. Remind me a whole lot of China and North Korea and Russia and even Canada to a large part. And every single thing the government takes away they take from the people. Simply put I don't agree with the distribution of wealth.
I see they found yet again more classified material concerning Biden. I wonder how many of these documents might be Ukraine or China related?
especially embarrassing in auto tech schoolwhen you skip civics classes
Rob Roy, using a sock puppet account is against TOS.All these things you imply the government should provide. Remind me a whole lot of China and North Korea and Russia and even Canada to a large part. And every single thing the government takes away they take from the people. Simply put I don't agree with the distribution of wealth.
I see they found yet again more classified material concerning Biden. I wonder how many of these documents might be Ukraine or China related?
the absence of any of the words “slavery, coercion, voluntary, rational” suggests that this is the sock of a different and garden-variety maga. The anarcho-hominid has a unique pseudo-erudite style, which I imagine he could not effectively conceal.Rob Roy, it is against TOS to post using a sock puppet account.
We need a sarcasm font.the absence of any of the words “slavery, coercion, voluntary, rational” suggests that this is the sock of a different and garden-variety maga. The anarcho-hominid has a unique pseudo-erudite style.
I wonder then what drives the considerable number of nonwhite “libertarians”. They can’t all be dupes.We need a sarcasm font.
Regardless the difference in their use of adjectives, the two share the same mindless belief that their lives would be better if there were no government. It is a belief most commonly found in antebellum slave states and that later instituted Jim Crow laws including segregation. That says it all regarding what they really want.
Show me a libertarian of the US variety and I'll show you a dupe. US libertarian ideology was crafted by a small group of economists working for a foundation that was funded by wealthy people who were searching for a political alternative to the New Deal. One of the founders even bragged about the propaganda coup they pulled off when they corrupted the meaning of libertarian from "for liberty" to "for property owners"I wonder then what drives the considerable number of nonwhite “libertarians”. They can’t all be dupes.
That seems to contradict your first sentence. The rest, with which I agree, means that many or most libertarians expect to be in the ruling or winner class of the sought authoritarian state. Most of these are dupes, but the final winners are the perpetrator class.Show me a libertarian of the US variety and I'll show you a dupe. US libertarian ideology was crafted by a small group of economists working for a foundation that was funded by wealthy people who were searching for a political alternative to the New Deal. One of the founders even bragged about the propaganda coup they pulled off when they corrupted the meaning of libertarian from "for liberty" to "for property owners"
Murray N. Rothbard
“One gratifying aspect of our rise to some prominence is that, for the first time in my memory, we, ‘our side,’ had captured a crucial word from the enemy . . . ‘Libertarians’ . . . had long been simply a polite word for left-wing anarchists, that is for anti-private property anarchists, either of the communist or syndicalist variety. But now we had taken it over...”
Wealthy people aren't libertarians. (Yes, I just made a sweeping statement and I suppose you could point to one who says they are.) Wealthy people are just about holding onto or growing their power and wealth. For example, the concept of a truly competitive free market is anathema to the the rich and powerful. To them, a fair share of the market is all of it.That seems to contradict your first sentence. The rest, with which I agree, means that many or most libertarians expect to be in the ruling or winner class of the sought authoritarian state. Most of these are dupes, but the final winners are the perpetrator class.
The English idiom “a person of quality” comes to mind, which vividly illustrates the idea of a leader class and a much larger (not truly human) loser class, to be exploited at will because there can be no crime against those who ultimately have no souls.
(It’s not my goal to nitpick.)Wealthy people aren't libertarians. (Yes, I just made a sweeping statement and I suppose you could point to one who says they are.) Wealthy people are just about holding onto or growing their power and wealth. For example, the concept of a truly competitive free market is anathema to the the rich and powerful. To them, a fair share of the market is all of it.
The principle that sells (dupes) people to earnestly say they are libertarians is the concept of voluntary association and belief in "the power of a free market". As you say, the end state of libertarian economics and ideology is hereditary nobility and monopoly of markets, which is exactly the opposite of what the literature used to sell libertarianism says it is. Hotrod, for example. He's just a dupe. Same with Rob Roy.(It’s not my goal to nitpick.)
But if you accept my elaboration of the model above, wealthy people are the libertarians, the nondupe ones, since the libertarian (ignoring the cynical semantics) goal is establishment of and participation in an ultimately hereditary nobility.
which is why I parenthetically described the semantics as cynical.The principle that sells (dupes) people to earnestly say they are libertarians is the concept of voluntary association and belief in "the power of a free market". As you say, the end state of libertarian economics and ideology is hereditary nobility and monopoly of markets, which is exactly the opposite of what the literature used to sell libertarianism says it is. Hotrod, for example. He's just a dupe. Same with Rob Roy.
So, yeah, wealthy people are selling libertarianism but they are confidence men who don't really subscribe to it themselves. What they are after is monopoly and power concentrated in their own hands.