No worries man, if you want a legit site that many here trust, try The Attitude Seed Bank or Nirvana.Anyone that is somewhat new to marijuana and not quite sure of how high thc levels can be in a plant would also be gullible to such a big site, let's stick to constructive criticism
BCseeds yup thats the BS site I was talking about...dude they are famous for overstating and overcharging for these outlandish claims of super high THC.Okay? read other forums about it. I'm thinking 38% thc is low compared what can be made today, not just the buds either lol. Unless you can somehow rule out this legitimate seedbank with strains exceeding 38% thc by a long shot.. here is an example of one strain that 54.3% thc, and if you keep searching you can find alot of other strains with thc levels higher then 38.
http://bcseeds.com/World-Strongest/c51/p207/Annihilation-Bud---10-Pack/product_info.html
I don't need to. Most vendors are full of shit, do not know what a gc/ms or lc/ms is and estimate the THC (which is always wrong). You'll find many strains that have been lc/ms'd are ~10% THC.. with the higher ranges being ~20%.Okay? read other forums about it.
I'm thinking I have about 100 MOM sources that say otherwise... and they kind of have the best bud/hash/hash oil/budder/earwax hash in the world.I'm thinking 38% thc is low compared what can be made today, not just the buds either lol.
You're arguing that BC Seeds has a strain that strong? Read their fucking disclaimer:Unless you can somehow rule out this legitimate seedbank
http://bcseeds.com/World-Strongest/c51/p207/Annihilation-Bud---10-Pack/product_info.html
Are you done yet?Even though our website tells fictional stories and thc levels, they are for entertainments purposes only and should not be considered fact or promote the use of any product for anything in conflict with the law.
Maybe if you would have read the entire thread you would discover that I learned from this, and that is why I'm here, any dis-respect from you or anyone else is humored and welcome. I love my haters haha. I'm here too learn and advise the best I can as I've already said.I don't need to. Most vendors are full of shit, do not know what a gc/ms or lc/ms is and estimate the THC (which is always wrong). You'll find many strains that have been lc/ms'd are ~10% THC.. with the higher ranges being ~20%.
I'm thinking I have about 100 MOM sources that say otherwise... and they kind of have the best bud/hash/hash oil/budder/earwax hash in the world.
You're arguing that BC Seeds has a strain that strong? Read their fucking disclaimer:
Are you done yet?
I'm just trying to keep your ass safe from ordering some rediculously expensive strain from BC Seeds and getting bag seed or nothing. If I hated you, you'd knowI love my haters haha.
I'm just trying to keep your ass safe from ordering some rediculously expensive strain from BC
Read before you criticize.Yes, I know hash is much more potent then marijuana.. and contains much more thc. and okay its just weird that bcseeds is about the 8th link on google when you type: marijuana seeds. so i did think it was a legit site with alot of strains over 30% thc. thankfully i didnt get scammed
What? ...Read before you criticize.
thanks.Just what this site needed, yet another purveyor of BCSeeds propaganda.
This is the rip-off section. The following seedbanks I've heard many bad things about. They are NOT recommended. aka means also known as. X means they seldom or never send the product. N means sending non viable seeds (non sprouting seeds) M indicates they send very inferior seeds or nothing at all.
A-1 Seedbank (X,N)
BC Seeds (X,M)
Beeoo (X)
Fairlight (X,N)
Greenmanspage (X,M)
marijuanaseed.us (X) Software Services aka Cannabis4u aka Medical hemp aka [email protected] [L.Pafort] (X)
Richies Seedshack (X)
Stinkey's (X)
Weedseed (X)
Pot a Gold (X)
http://www.seedbankupdate.com/su.html
You are more than welcome but I did go back and delete the message since it was already established that BCSeeds cannot be trusted any farther than someone could comfortably spit out a rat. I have posted the information and a link to verify it with so many times now and I did not think it was needed at this point and felt it might spark things back up and I did not want to unintentionally initiate that. I guess it will now remain in quote form in this thread.thanks.
okay thanksThis thread was never good.