Am I Right To Start Flushing Now?

Doer · Feb 22, 2015

blimey said:
Implying not flushing grows tastier weed? Why are you being so rude, I actually thought we were going to sift the bullshit that's filled this thread. I guess you're just going to avoid directly answering the question too. K.

Oh, so....a sociopath. Tap dance around, make no sense, change the question, and I am rude?

Hey look in the mirror. No one is arguing and no one can convince you but you...with double blind tests.

I keep saying that and you act like we are debating.

Pinworm · Feb 22, 2015

althor said:
I have done side by side comparisons atleast 50 times

althor said:
Yeah I have done this experiment on atleast 50 plants over the years

althor said:
I am not just pulling something out of my ass

So which was it, 50 plants or 50 tests. Do you have any data you can provide?

althor said:
I can't prove it because it is not based in fact

AlecTheGardener · Feb 22, 2015

blimey said:
Implying not flushing grows tastier weed? Why are you being so rude, I actually thought we were going to sift the bullshit that's filled this thread. I guess you're just going to avoid directly answering the question too. K.

I answered all your questioned ages ago, you will not accept proofs, research and firsthand experimentation with controls and double blind tastes.

Not enough for you.

Prove to me that I need to 'flush' tobacco plants before I harvest and cure.

If you can cannabis will work also.

blimey · Feb 22, 2015

Doer said:
You can run double blind test and knock off arguments. I don't care what you do. I don't have to be right.

Right on, I'm just trying to figure out why people are so adament that I'm wrong. With such strong opinons it seems like people should just able to say, "oh not flushing gives you 3% more trimmed bud" or "not flushing makes it taste better" or "not flushing makes it more potent"
I haven't seen any reasons that can lead to any conclusion like these.

chuck estevez · Feb 22, 2015

blimey said:
Implying not flushing grows tastier weed? Why are you being so rude, I actually thought we were going to sift the bullshit that's filled this thread. I guess you're just going to avoid directly answering the question too. K.

we never said not flushing grows tastier weed, Good growers who know how to grow,dry and cure good genetics is what makes tasty weed, not some forum myth of running water thru the root zone for 2 weeks when the plant is at it's most important time of production.

dbdweller · Feb 22, 2015

Well after almost 40 years i am not green.

The third state is amber. Amber trichomes contain degraded THC... NO IF AND OR BUTS

you may think that but you really are hurting. If they run into amber at veg.. your already down hill from there.

reapersfamiliar · Feb 22, 2015

chuck estevez said:
and what was ORGANIC about it? did they use nutrients to grow the tree and fruit? more pretty pics

i can taste the difference in organic banana tomato etc over conventional.

and i would spend the money if i didn't have to.

i buy for the taste.

Doer · Feb 22, 2015

blimey said:
Right on, I'm just trying to figure out why people are so adament that I'm wrong. With such strong opinons it seems like people should just able to say, "oh not flushing gives you 3% more trimmed bud" or "not flushing makes it taste better" or "not flushing makes it more potent"
I haven't seen any reasons that can lead to any conclusion like these.

WAKE UP. I am beginning to realize you don't seem up to the discussion.

You ask. We say. You reject the answer, you don't like, and ask again.

That is trolling.

chuck estevez · Feb 22, 2015

reapersfamiliar said:
i can taste the difference in organic banana tomato etc over conventional.

and i would spend the money if i didn't have to.

i buy for the taste.

you can maybe taste the difference of a better farmer, but the word organic really is bs

reapersfamiliar · Feb 22, 2015

blimey said:
Right on, I'm just trying to figure out why people are so adament that I'm wrong. With such strong opinons it seems like people should just able to say, "oh not flushing gives you 3% more trimmed bud" or "not flushing makes it taste better" or "not flushing makes it more potent"
I haven't seen any reasons that can lead to any conclusion like these.

there's no discernable difference then why do it? another messy step.

blimey · Feb 22, 2015

Doer said:
WAKE UP. I am beginning to realize you don't seem up to the discussion.

You ask. We say. You reject the answer, you don't like, and ask again.

That is trolling.

I promise I'm not. Maybe I missed it through all the bickering. If I saw any of those reasons I'd feed till the end everytime.

Doer · Feb 22, 2015

If they run into amber at veg.

WHAT? How can you have amber in veg, if you are talking about tricomes? If you are talking about leaves
the color is yellow.

Doer · Feb 22, 2015

blimey said:
I promise I'm not. Maybe I missed it through all the bickering. If I saw any of those reasons I'd feed till the end everytime.

Are you blind or lazy? Go back and read.

blimey · Feb 22, 2015

reapersfamiliar said:
there's no discernable difference then why do it? another messy step.

Less messy actually because you mix less nutrients and you save on nutrients.
This whole time I've been saying to just stop using base nutes.

reapersfamiliar · Feb 22, 2015

chuck estevez said:
you can maybe taste the difference of a better farmer, but the word organic really is bs

hey, maybe that is it, but i do shop at WFM because of the superior food and it's taste.

i would not spend the money if there was no difference.

why would i?

and why would i flush if there is no difference? because i like work? :lol:

blimey · Feb 22, 2015

Doer said:
Are you blind or lazy? Go back and read.

I feel like it would of taken you less time to just say you get more weed if that was true.

blimey · Feb 22, 2015

reapersfamiliar said:
hey, maybe that is it, but i do shop at WFM because of the superior food and it's taste.

i would not spend the money if there was no difference.

why would i?

and why would i flush if there is no difference? because i like work?

My flush is just watering without base nutes. No extra work, a little bit less.

chuck estevez · Feb 22, 2015

blimey said:
Less messy actually because you mix less nutrients and you save on nutrients.
This whole time I've been saying to just stop using base nutes.

so you flush if you're a lazy tight ass and don't want to spend another $2 for nutes?

reapersfamiliar · Feb 22, 2015

blimey said:
Less messy actually because you mix less nutrients and you save on nutrients.
This whole time I've been saying to just stop using base nutes.

look, you don't have to believe me.

i've been doing this long enough and have tried the flush after my first few grows to see if there was a difference.

there wasn't and it was a pain in the ass to drag them into the shower and soil got in the drain as a "true flush" is several X's pot volume this was the only way for me to accomplish this.

blimey · Feb 22, 2015

chuck estevez said:
so you flush if your a lazy tight ass and don't want to spend another $2 for nutes?

And have less risk of having something that could compromise a patient's immune system. Yes.
I really dont' see the down side here.

Am I Right To Start Flushing Now?

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Active Member

Well-Known Member

Active Member

Active Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Active Member

Active Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Active Member

Active Member

Active Member

Active Member

Well-Known Member

Active Member

Active Member