So the guy is wired. There's just one problem with the Ron Paul story: Ron Paul. Sure, he seems like a decent guy, forthright and honest. Unfortunately, his paleo-libertarian policies make Ayn Rand look like Mother Teresa. I like the gold standard as much as the next guy, but I'm not sure we're ready to overturn three decades of reasonably successful economic policy in order to reinstate it. I don't agree that the minimum wage should be abolished. (Ever work in retail, Ron?) And while I like Paul's stance on Iraq (let's get the hell out), I'm not thrilled with his position on the United Nations (let's get the hell out).
The Ron Paul candidacy is a lot like the first wave of Facebook apps: thrilling as a notion, disappointing as content. If this were a meta-election an election on how to run an election I'd happily throw my digg behind Paul. Unfortunately, it's an election about how to run a country. So, much as I'm drawn to long shots, I'm afraid I'll have to sit out the Paulapalooza. Kucinich, if you're still around when this piece runs, call me. I'm available.
As you can see, there are some negatives to the Ron Paul story. That is why I never got behind him. Abolishment of the minimum wage would surely spell slavery for the underclass. Getting out of Iraq, Super. Getting out of the UN, Stupid.