Do you realize that there are more signs than "okay" and that communicating in sign language involves more than a bunch of people just saying "okay" back and forth to each other for hours..? Do you see how dumb your lies are?
Anyone else watching the Kyle Rittenhouse trial?
- Thread starter BodegaBud
- Start date
Applesauceisgood
Well-Known Member
I am not left or right. January 6th was despicable. Are you tribalized?
Livingblacksoil
Well-Known Member
Amazing how many law abiding good citizens are on this thread.
We cannabis growers should know the difference between right/wrong and the law.
There was a time( only two generations ago ) when it was illegal to read in this country.
We cannabis growers should know the difference between right/wrong and the law.
There was a time( only two generations ago ) when it was illegal to read in this country.
Smokinggun
Well-Known Member
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
lol way to dodge what I said while not coming off like a complete propaganda tool.
What is 'tribalized'?
Oh wait I think this idiot just gave an example of it.
Applesauceisgood
Well-Known Member
It doesn't detract from the point - the OK sign is not a white supremacist symbol. It was planted in your brain by people who are trolls looking to divide people and you took the bait.
Applesauceisgood
Well-Known Member
I haven't seen evidence ANTIFA was responsible for January 6th. If you have any, I would be willing to take a look.
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
Nice secondary troll'splanation.It doesn't detract from the point - the OK sign is not a white supremacist symbol. It was planted in your brain by people who are trolls looking to divide people and you took the bait.
More than one thing can be true at the same time.
Lol have you read the law?? It's in obvious conflict with itself and the error clearly lies with the wording in 3c.
948.60 Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
(1) In this section, “dangerous weapon" means any firearm, loaded or unloaded; any electric weapon, as defined in s. 941.295 (1c) (a); metallic knuckles or knuckles of any substance which could be put to the same use with the same or similar effect as metallic knuckles; a nunchaku or any similar weapon consisting of 2 sticks of wood, plastic or metal connected at one end by a length of rope, chain, wire or leather; a cestus or similar material weighted with metal or other substance and worn on the hand; a shuriken or any similar pointed star-like object intended to injure a person when thrown; or a manrikigusari or similar length of chain having weighted ends.
(2)
(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
(b) Except as provided in par. (c), any person who intentionally sells, loans or gives a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age is guilty of a Class I felony.
(c) Whoever violates par. (b) is guilty of a Class H felony if the person under 18 years of age under par. (b) discharges the firearm and the discharge causes death to himself, herself or another.
(d) A person under 17 years of age who has violated this subsection is subject to the provisions of ch. 938 unless jurisdiction is waived under s. 938.18 or the person is subject to the jurisdiction of a court of criminal jurisdiction under s. 938.183.
(3)
(a) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon when the dangerous weapon is being used in target practice under the supervision of an adult or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the supervision of an adult. This section does not apply to an adult who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age for use only in target practice under the adult's supervision or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the adult's supervision.
(b) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon in the line of duty. This section does not apply to an adult who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age in the line of duty.
(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28.
History: 1987 a. 332; 1991 a. 18, 139; 1993 a. 98; 1995 a. 27, 77; 1997 a. 248; 2001 a. 109; 2005 a. 163; 2011 a. 35.
Sub. (2) (b) does not set a standard for civil liability, and a violation of sub. (2) (b) does not constitute negligence per se. Logarto v. Gustafson, 998 F. Supp. 998 (199.
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
Nope, it was not 'ANTIFA' outside of a handful of kids in Portland (maybe) it is just more right wing fear mongering propaganda term.
Just like this kid killer being some bullshit hero.
Applesauceisgood
Well-Known Member
I don't disagree. I think both extreme sides of the political spectrum have embarrassed themselves over the last few years.
ASMALLVOICE
Well-Known Member
you just don't get it do you...lol
They attacked him first. Had they left him the hell alone, they would still be alive becoming better criminals. Just stay in your lane and you wont get capped, really is that simple!
More cliche chicken shit lies. It's used for more than one thing. When kyle and all his redneck buddies use it, it's not used as "okay". Best case, it's like you said, for trolling. That's as good as it gets and the usage is only downhill from there.It doesn't detract from the point - the OK sign is not a white supremacist symbol. It was planted in your brain by people who are trolls looking to divide people and you took the bait.
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
That is because it is the same propagandists doing it. Right wing trolls cat fishing as 'the left' to trick people into thinking there is something to the 'both sides' bullshit.
Applesauceisgood
Well-Known Member
Indeed - the insanity of attaching nefarious meanings to innocent symbols is backwards thinking. Average people can only laugh at the idea. I prefer not to alter the way I dress or speak to deaf individuals because of a 4chan troll job attempting to wedge people. Tomorrow waving at someone is a white supremacist calling card because trolls deemed it so and people took the bait? No thanks
SFnone
Well-Known Member
Hmm... maybe that fat bitch rittenhouse should have followed your advise instead of showing up to a rightful protest with a rifle. What do guns do? They kill. You're an idiot.
m4s73r
Well-Known Member
If you were black or a female
According to a report in The New York Times, it started in early 2017 when some users on the anonymous online message board 4chan began “Operation O-KKK” — to see if they could lead American liberals and the mainstream media to believe that the gesture was actually a secret symbol of White power.It doesn't detract from the point - the OK sign is not a white supremacist symbol. It was planted in your brain by people who are trolls looking to divide people and you took the bait.
“We must flood Twitter and other social media websites with spam, claiming that the OK hand signal is a symbol of white supremacy,” one of the users posted, according to The NYT report. The prankster suggested that everyone should create fake social media accounts with “basic white girl names” to spread the notion wide.
Soon, however, the 4chan hoax ceased to be one: Neo-Nazis, Ku Klux Klansmen, and assorted White supremacists began to use the gesture in public to signal their presence and to spot potential sympathizers and recruits. “For them, the letters formed by the hand were not O and K, but W and P, for ‘White Power’,” The NYT report said.
As the popularity of the gesture grew, it added on more symbols — the Southern Poverty Law Center, an American nonprofit legal advocacy that is focused on civil rights and public interest litigation especially against White supremacist groups, has identified memes featuring the alt-right mascot Pepe the Frog, among others.
Applesauceisgood
Well-Known Member
I condemn rioting at the capital. I condemn looting, murder and destruction at protests that occurred last summer.
Applesauceisgood
Well-Known Member
The protest wasn't "rightful" because their actions were illegal. Burning and looting isn't a rightful protest. Chasing someone and assaulting them is not lawful behavior.
m4s73r
Well-Known Member
And you really dont see that this trial was slanted as shit. This was a normal fair trial that any citizen in the US would have gotten?