Well shitI use it from time to time, usually would be a sarcastic thing when I did. I blame Eddie Murphy.
View attachment 5030418View attachment 5030419View attachment 5030420
Right. Like you don’t know what it means.You do know that was an OK sign and “ perfect” long before it was whatever sign the Proud Boys are using it for now
Napsalot was referring to your ignorance, dumbass.Do you think he’s actually a PB? If anything he’s an impressionable kid that was trying to impress some older guys. That’s even if that’s not photoshopped
Aint we allNapsalot was referring to your ignorance, dumbass.
Aint we all
It looks he's holding an invisible jointI use it from time to time, usually would be a sarcastic thing when I did. I blame Eddie Murphy.
View attachment 5030420
While I agree with the defendant being a soft idiot looking to exert authority on rioters I disagree with the "protest" part.
Whether you're the prosecution or defense, you want to CONNECT with the jurySidebar: watching the opening of the Arbury case, these lawyers are getting too reliant on videos. Tell the story, use the video as proof if necessary, but tell the story. Staring down at a laptop instead of focusing on the jury is a huge mistake, huge.
What part of Black Lives Matter's agenda do you disagree with?While I agree with the defendant being a soft idiot looking to exert authority on rioters I disagree with the "protest" part.
Vigilantes wouldn't be roving the streets if the police didn't let rioters destroy the place.
But hey, when they're not killing unarmed people I guess they don't care what goes on.
I’d bring a dozen donuts and DunkinsWhether you're the prosecution or defense, you want to CONNECT with the jury
I was the foreman of a jury deliberating a felony case in Vegas in ~1987I’d bring a dozen donuts and Dunkins
Good question. Though what is the BLM agenda?What part of Black Lives Matter's agenda do you disagree with
I posted their agenda as written in their "about" section in an earlier post. Read it or open their webpage on the subject..Good question. Though what is the BLM agenda?
Also, I thought the people shot by KR were white, where does the BLM matter apply to this case?
Thanks for your reply.....I'm still confused where BLM matters come into play with KM shooting white people.I posted their agenda as written in their "about" section.
The questions you asked is so easy to answer yourself that I won't indulge you further.
I laughed because the armed vigilantes have been out since the beginning of the year long protests and never left.While I agree with the defendant being a soft idiot looking to exert authority on rioters I disagree with the "protest" part.
Vigilantes wouldn't be roving the streets if the police didn't let rioters destroy the place.
But hey, when they're not killing unarmed people I guess they don't care what goes on.