Are some people geneticly superior and are others less evolved?

someone 5ft can still be athletic.

you could make differnt breeds of humans and new breeds just like dogs, but sombody with a much longer life span would have to be present or the expirimant would never continue long enough to work most likey cuz it would take at least 10 human generations

You are absolutely right but that is irrelevant. Do we need to go over reading comprehension AGAIN, blazin256?

Big P: Properly recording the results of each generation would ensure that we could gather the same information. It would not require a 500 year old person to figure it out. Unfortunately, you may not see results in those first 10 generations.

Twistedfunk said:

Arnold is a world class idiot of the Elitist Class. He is far from superior. If the world's elite families are inbreeding then they will likely kill their own line when they all pop out deformed. Most of the elite caste marriage setups were to continue royal blood without inbreeding but that's just "royal blood". They never had enough understanding of genetics to breed certain traits for a certain purpose in people. It was borderline mysticism. I don't see how having generations of inbreeding people that have an average reasoning ability could be considered genetic superiority. It would only work in a vacuum anyway since there is too much genetic variation and people can be unpredictable with whom they choose to mate with.

Hitler thought a lot about genetic superiority but failed in basic reasoning. Answers to your questions about genetics and evolution can be found on other more reputable and informative sites. Nature is the best proof though. There are plenty of instances on our planet where a known organism has been stuck in a very different environment than what would be "normal" and entire new ecosystems and species have evolved as a result.

Our world is constantly changing and with it so are our perceptions of what is "superior".

Haze: If you are suggesting that everyone has the same ability for athleticism as Brock Lesnar, then you are probably deluding your self. If the switch isn't turned on in your genetic make-up, it simply isn't possible for you. That's like saying someone who is 5ft tall can easily become 7ft tall if they just work hard enough.

Click to expand...

Arnold is superior Even if you did steriods and worked out and read books you wouldn't get as big or smart as Arnold

Not sure whom this guy would be considered superior to:

damn you guys love the cock

Too bad for Arnie that he's ugly as fuck!

Also, I think that surroundings and environment have a lot to do with genetics! Totally, look at most of the hottest places in the world that are inhabited by man, usually black or african races. And most cold ass places that are covered in ice all year round, european or white races.
Infact when you think about it, Africans are naturally superior in a physical way, they are stronger, they usually have 20-20 vision, rarely get sick (most deseases that are in african communities today were introduced by white people) they run like crazy aswell!

To me the fact that we as a race are getting weaker, smaller or worse physically is totally because of our environment and technology. We don't have to do shit to survive in today's world (atleast those living in 1st world countries) so what's happening? We are getting less physically superior and more intellectually superior (technologically speaking) and I think that that is a direct result of our techno-evolution, we can almost control our evolution in this day and age. And as technology evolves more and more, we as human being will evolve less and less. Until there is a balance.

I don't really know about the intelligence side of things though, I mean, we haven't necessarily gotten smarter as a race, but we have developed materials to help us evolve and understand things a bit better. We've had smart men and woman since the beginning of humanity, and they have searched the stars and oceans all throughout that time, today we have equipment designed to help us in everyway possible and in the future we wil have equipment adequate to learn about what ever it is we will be researching at the time. And to me that is the big difference. The tech!

I think that we have reached a peak of "intelligence" as such, as a species, what will evolve from here on out will be technology.
But who knows what we have tucked up inside our brains, we could have much more to descover yet. It would be interesting to see what the future will be like, that is, if the earth allows us to stay around for long enough.

actually its an american misconception that africans and bigger and stronger than the other races. if you look at africans in africa as a whole this it not the case,


african americans, many of whom have the jeans of slaves in them carry on the chosen traits of thier captours, who carfully selected and paid extra for the the cream of the slavish crop if you will


like how every slave owner wanted large strong slaves, the would often also evaluate the size of thier genitalia as a determining facter to help choose the strongest one like they do with cattle. this is why u see so many african americans dominating in sports in america,


every race may have a little advantage here and there over another, but for the huge differences in american sports where african americans who are like 10% of the US population but make up like 85% of professional sports athleats, that is not a coincidence and no human race is that much more supirior than the other


like I said every race has thier general advantages and disadgantages due to thier particular skill sets developed through adaptation to thier local environment, but no where near what is displayed by african americans in america,

I think people with flat feet are superior...just fucking around.

Big P said:

actually its an american misconception that africans and bigger and stronger than the other races. if you look at africans in africa as a whole this it not the case,


african americans, many of whom have the jeans of slaves in them carry on the chosen traits of thier captours, who carfully selected and paid extra for the the cream of the slavish crop if you will


like how every slave owner wanted large strong slaves, the would often also evaluate the size of thier genitalia as a determining facter to help choose the strongest one like they do with cattle. this is why u see so many african americans dominating in sports in america,


every race may have a little advantage here and there over another, but for the huge differences in american sports where african americans who are like 10% of the US population but make up like 85% of professional sports athleats, that is not a coincidence and no human race is that much more supirior than the other


like I said every race has thier general advantages and disadgantages due to thier particular skill sets developed through adaptation to thier local environment, but no where near what is displayed by african americans in america,

Click to expand...

You theory makes a lot of sense. In some cases. It seems pretty strange though, talking as if afro american were draughted like horses. I mean, Africans in general are stronger physically, I've meet and known many in my short life, and only a handful were smaller than me.
I have read scientific articles though that have mentioned that africans actually do have a larger muscle mass, I really can't remember if the studies were based on afro-americans or native Africans.

Another thing is there have just recently been descovered foot prints fossils of ancient aboriginies in Australia, and they came up with all soughts of scientific data, things like, they were much taller, much faster, much more agile people than what most people are today, and that to me has everything to do with their living conditions, I really can't remember the year they calculated they were from, but they were fairly old. But aboriginies even today are usually fast as hell, and stong as hell aswell!

Anyway, sorry I can't back any of this chat up, am at work and don't have time to look for true numbers and facts.

ya I think people in the western world are not as strong gernerally then well fed people in 3rd world countries. I was born in Jordan and im a small guy normal lookin no muscles but for some reason ever since I was I was in second grade nobody in my class or grade could beat me in arm wrestleing even much biger dudes. it was pretty cool at the time


I think it all has to do with diet. like as a kid growing up in jordan all we ate was like meat cheese fruits veggies and all type of home cook non processed foods straight from nature plants and animals,


in america there they put so much grabage in our food with all the fillers and chemicals its no wonder the boys dont grow up as strong as say a farm boy in brazil who is well fed on natural stuff, you know, no chips pudding jello twinkies etc

like i have a friend who is asian, and his parents both from north korea are very tiny people, but thier son is huge tall and fat. looks radically different. and he told me they are so much smaller because of thier meager diet while growing up in north korea. he on the other hand was raised in a western country and is a huge dude.


now i no longer feel strong and toned for I have suckled too long on the junk food teet of the indugancies of the western world, its been fun though really


i gotta stop feedin my son junkfood

Big P said:

ya I think people in the western world are not as strong gernerally then well fed people in 3rd world countries. I was born in Jordan and im a small guy normal lookin no muscles but for some reason ever since I was I was in second grade nobody in my class or grade could beat me in arm wrestleing even much biger dudes. it was pretty cool at the time


I think it all has to do with diet. like as a kid growing up in jordan all we ate was like meat cheese fruits veggies and all type of home cook non processed foods straight from nature plants and animals,


in america there they put so much grabage in our food with all the fillers and chemicals its no wonder the boys dont grow up as strong as say a farm boy in brazil who is well fed on natural stuff, you know, no chips pudding jello twinkies etc

like i have a friend who is asian, and his parents both from north korea are very tiny people, but thier son is huge tall and fat. looks radically different. and he told me they are so much smaller because of thier meager diet while growing up in north korea. he on the other hand was raised in a western country and is a huge dude.


now i no longer feel strong and toned for I have suckled too long on the junk food teet of the indugancies of the western world, its been fun though really


i gotta stop feedin my son junkfood

Click to expand...

You calling me a Brazilian farm boy?!?! Hahahah jokes, I am actually from New Zealand, and we are pretty healthy there. My mum always put emphasis on eating well, and lots of exercise, which is what would replicate a life style in the old days, no technology or things to make our lives "easier".

But yeah man, Junk food is the devil! Hahaha, it's so good, but so taxing on the body. If only I had the power to say no.

You're right though, diet plays a huge part aswell.
Jordan must have been an interesting place to grow up.

Twistedfunk said:

Each of the major races has attributes garnered from generations of evolution within a certain region. While we are all of the same species, there is a ton of genetic diversity. Asian people tend to have a higher IQ while African's tend to be more athletic. Of course, there are always exceptions and genetic variance is always a factor. There is also evidence to support past interbreeding with Neanderthals which you can see with the naked eye every now and then.

This being said, we are barely more evolved than cavemen. We just have centuries of recorded history and technological advancements to trick us into thinking otherwise. Yes, you may be smarter than the Neanderthal looking neighbor but that is genetic variation and not a sign that you are more advanced as a human being. Evolution does not mean advancement, either. Due to genetic variation, some of us either succeed and reproduce thus passing on our genes or we die before getting a chance. It doesn't mean you're better than someone else. It just means that your genetic variation was better suited to your environment.

Click to expand...

This is the most stereotypical post ever!

Asians have higher IQ's? Not necessarily! I think their culture and their schooling systems are more responsible for good grades rather than being a genetically determined straight A student. Some people are naturally more smarter than others but to try to classify a race as being 'smarter' is just ignorant. Africans tend to be more athletic. Thats just as much non-sense as the asian's being smarter. First, most African Americans can be seen as being more athletically inclined because there was basically a 'thinning out' of weak Africans during the slave trades, resulting in a cliche survival of the fittest. Next, Im an athlete and Im white and I have no doubt that I can beat many Africans and Europeans equally because I train harder or vice versa.

Evolution is about a descent with modification. Only the traits that are best fit for surviving are going to matter. Evolution/Advancement can be defined in so many ways depending on the situation.

Nice insight. Consider another perspective. Man was engineered by mixing Homo Erectus DNA with Annunaki DNA. The Chinese got a 67% dose of Annunaki DNA, the Africans 50% and the Whites 80% The whites and chinese got more due to interbreeding of the Annunaki with their engineered workforce. Neandertal was a failed first attempt and was allowed to die out. Google Sumerian Tablets, they are a written record of this event thousands of years old. The Annunaki came to earth from a planet in our solar system that we finally detected just recently. Google planet Eris or planet X. This explains the 2000 ton rocks we find that were fitted together millenia ago, so tightly you can not fit a playing card between them. Google oopart.

I won't argue with you. Feel free to flex your google-fu or better yet. Take a class sociology/psychology class. Yes, i made some general stereotypes but i also recognized doing so and stated as such. It was for example which was an accurate one since i used actual research evidence.

You say "Only the traits that are best fir for surviving are going to matter" but that is misleading. What you should have said was "The traits that are best fit for survival within a particular environment are more likely to be passed on".

Who are you to decide what matters? What seem harmful to your way of life now could be absolutely crucial to life 2 generations down.

I can only find 1 definition of "Evolution". Someone has been misleading you, sir.

Flex my google-fu? Ha, way to show your ignorance with assumptions. Ill go ahead and let you know that I am in college...So take your pompous/psuedo-pedantic-ness and shove it up your arse. I hate assholes like you who think theyre better than everyone when you have no idea who the hell your talking to. Also, just so you know, genetics deal with cellular biology, not psychology and sociology. But someone as 'smart' as yourself probably already knows that.

If its scientific fact, then please, post me a link and Ill educate myself because Im not seeing your links...

Traits that are best for suvival are going to matter. Take Darwins observation of Finches on the Galopagos Islands. Birds with shorter beaks wouldnt be able to compete with birds with longer beaks if that was the only way they could get to available food, so yes, those traits that allow the birds with the longer beak to survive and pass on that particular 'modification.' And yeah, what you said is right too. Both of those statements are true and intertwined.

I didnt decide anything. Im saying that environmental factors are going to play a larger role in what determines what modified genetic material survives and is, subsequently, passed on to future generations.


And BTW, Im not arguing. Im debating with what you are saying because I dont believe in it. So, excuse me for having my own opinions and not being a carbon copy of you.

Soooo.... america - land of the superblacks?

I reckon so to a certain degree - both mentally and physically

Mellowman2112 said:

Nice insight. Consider another perspective. Man was engineered by mixing Homo Erectus DNA with Annunaki DNA. The Chinese got a 67% dose of Annunaki DNA, the Africans 50% and the Whites 80% The whites and chinese got more due to interbreeding of the Annunaki with their engineered workforce. Neandertal was a failed first attempt and was allowed to die out. Google Sumerian Tablets, they are a written record of this event thousands of years old. The Annunaki came to earth from a planet in our solar system that we finally detected just recently. Google planet Eris or planet X. This explains the 2000 ton rocks we find that were fitted together millenia ago, so tightly you can not fit a playing card between them. Google oopart.

Click to expand...

or not, if that was true I THINK the dna would show up in tests as two diff species and those differnces in amounts of foriegn dna would also be common knowlege by now ,after all we've tracked our species back 4 million years purely by dna test. look up star child skull the dna only half matches human its mother was a human but father is is an unknown species although likely just a rare deformity its still interesting.



And would this mean that a half afro american and and asian man would make a superhuman lol