Assange the rapist headed to face the music

ttystikk said:
Somehow I'm just not buying innovation that Democrats would have nominated a pro union judge for the post. After all, they skipped so many chances to do so in the past.

Tell us again how your party gives a fuck about average Americans while taking millions from the donor class?

Because I'm not seeing it.

Your smokescreen isn't helping.
Click to expand...
Nobody gives a shit what you believe or "what you don't buy".
 
TacoMac said:
No, you are not. You're defending HIM.

He was OFFERED Due Process. HE CHOSE TO HIDE FROM IT AND AVOID IT AT ALL COSTS.

And you are DEFENDING HIM for doing exactly that.
Click to expand...
1. you're not a lawyer
2. He has every reason to believe that he's being persecuted for divulging secrets
3. He has the same rights to due process as anyone else

When he's found guilty, then you can call him a criminal. Until then, he's a journalist and whistle blower.

Or would you really rather not know of all the human rights violations, war crimes and malfeasance committed in our name by our government?

Lol I'm not sure I want to know the answer.
 
ttystikk said:
1. you're not a lawyer
2. He has every reason to believe that he's being persecuted for divulging secrets
3. He has the same rights to due process as anyone else

When he's found guilty, then you can call him a criminal. Until then, he's a journalist and whistle blower.

Or would you really rather not know of all the human rights violations, war crimes and malfeasance committed in our name by our government?

Lol I'm not sure I want to know the answer.
Click to expand...
Sorry I was a second late. But he did run from a rape charge. That's what lawyers are for. Due process won't send him down the river for shit that had nothing to do with his rape charge.

If he didn't do it.. he has nothing to hide.
 
srh88 said:
Sorry I was a second late. But he did run from a rape charge. That's what lawyers are for. Due process won't send him down the river for shit that had nothing to do with his rape charge.

If he didn't do it.. he has nothing to hide.
Click to expand...
#2 on the list. Yes, it happens.
 
ttystikk said:
#2 on the list. Yes, it happens.
Click to expand...
It does happen. But also... He conspired with Russia against our country. If he was really just whistle blowing, .All of Trump's shit would be out there too. Assange is too good at what he does to not have dirt on trump. He sold out to the highest bidder and helped put trump in office. WikiLeaks lost there credibility after that for me. If it was about integrity... Really just trying to put stuff out to help our country. We would have gotten dirt on both
 
srh88 said:
It does happen. But also... He conspired with Russia against our country. If he was really just whistle blowing, .All of Trump's shit would be out there too. Assange is too good at what he does to not have dirt on trump. He sold out to the highest bidder and helped put trump in office. WikiLeaks lost there credibility after that for me. If it was about integrity... Really just trying to put stuff out to help our country. We would have gotten dirt on both
Click to expand...
What evidence is there that he conspired with anyone? He published information. That's what journalists do.
 
srh88 said:
So why's he running? No evidence right? No crimes.. so what's he running from?


View attachment 4172044
Click to expand...
Persecution for releasing information the United States doesn't want the world to see, duh!

Have you people completely forgotten the value to a free democracy of a free personal and the work of Whistleblowers?!

Are you completely snowed by the bullshit from the Military Industrial Complex, those who profit from it and the mass murder it commits in our names?
 
doublejj said:
the crap that assange distributed was russian propaganda.... he's not our friend
Click to expand...
Shouldn't people be more concerned with what was leaked than with who leaked it for what reason?

If people within the Democratic party acted right, Russia, Assange/Wikileaks, wouldn't have anything damaging to the party to leak. They didn't, that's what made them so vulnerable to leaks in the first place. Where is the outrage towards them for this? Why are none you just as outraged the Democratic party lied to voters and propped up a candidate that couldn't win against a reality TV show star the same party also propped up because they thought he would be the easiest Republican to defeat?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top