Heisenberg
Well-Known Member
We all misspeak now and again. If your original post was meant as a question or just a suggestion for a topic to discuss then it seems I misunderstood you a bit. However you do still seem to be making claims, and still didn't post a link, despite saying you were reading a page yourself. So I suspect you'll continue to get heat for that. One thing your are sure to get is discussion about pseudoscience, and lots of demonstrations of critical thinking.
I am actually prepared to accept they found a plane, or any significant object, after 24 years of trying. This hardly defies chance and certainly doesn't count as extraordinary evidence. As I said before, remote viewing is so easily tested, so easy to demonstrate, that it seems someone would have some results by now, even if by accident alone. After 20 million in govt testing and who knows how many private attempts, we have no working mechanism to point to, no clear utility for such an ability, and no replicable results of any kind outside of some vague conjecture. Why do we not regularly see missing persons and pets being found by viewers? Why can't viewers see a simple random number generator in the next room? Why did none of them see the unfolding of 911, the Oklahoma bombing, or the ending to Lost? Why did it take the FBI so long to find the Unibomber? How many years did viewers have to find Osama? If the govt did gain something from it's project that it's keeping secret, there doesn't seem to be any evidence of it's use what-so-ever. And if the Russians learned anything, it's seems they are not putting it to practice either.
