Bailout Bonds

ilkhan

Well-Known Member
Now you to can Invest in the AIG-GM Bailout With these Bailout Bonds. They are a Win-Win-Win situation!!

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/09/business/09fund.html

By purchasing these bond you will be aiding Obamas economic plans and make some money for yourself in the process.

“They are getting taxed for this problem. They should have an opportunity to participate in the recovery.” said the official, who asked for anonymity.

"You might get the chance to put your money where your ideological convictions are. The Obama administration is cajoling investment companies to create bailout bonds. These would be similar to the bonds that wartime presidents created to find sucker-investors for their wars. Americans were browbeaten into buying them as a patriotic duty. So too those who say "yes, we can" to the bailouts will be asked to do their patriotic duty, and buy the debt of loser companies."
Mises Daily by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
http://mises.org/story/3418

Where do you stand.
 

TheBrutalTruth

Well-Known Member
Now you to can Invest in the AIG-GM Bailout With these Bailout Bonds. They are a Win-Win-Win situation!!

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/09/business/09fund.html

By purchasing these bond you will be aiding Obamas economic plans and make some money for yourself in the process.

“They are getting taxed for this problem. They should have an opportunity to participate in the recovery.” said the official, who asked for anonymity.

"You might get the chance to put your money where your ideological convictions are. The Obama administration is cajoling investment companies to create bailout bonds. These would be similar to the bonds that wartime presidents created to find sucker-investors for their wars. Americans were browbeaten into buying them as a patriotic duty. So too those who say "yes, we can" to the bailouts will be asked to do their patriotic duty, and buy the debt of loser companies."
Mises Daily by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
http://mises.org/story/3418

Where do you stand.
Wait, let me make sure I have this right.

1. The entity that has stolen 1/3rd of the last 2 years of my working life (2/3rds of 1 year) expects me to voluntarily give it more money

2. Because it actually doesn't have the money that it is stealing from me

3. Having squandered it or given it to corrupt wanksters, err banksters


Sounds like 3 Strikes to me

The Government can go fuck off.

Hey, where's Med O Mao, maybe he'll think this is a good idea, it is right after all up his alley sharing his philosophy of "spreading" the wealth, and his delusional trust in the government.

Though there was a Leftist that had the stupidity to ask who will protect us from the corporations.

I have only one question now, "Is this what you mean by 'protection' from the corporations? And if it is what are you on that you think this is a good thing?

Or maybe, Who will protect us from the government, since it is clear that the government is more interested in protecting the corporations from their stupidity?

Nevermind that's something the leftists agree with, protecting people from their own damn stupidity.
 

medicineman

New Member
Wait, let me make sure I have this right.

1. The entity that has stolen 1/3rd of the last 2 years of my working life (2/3rds of 1 year) expects me to voluntarily give it more money

2. Because it actually doesn't have the money that it is stealing from me

3. Having squandered it or given it to corrupt wanksters, err banksters


Sounds like 3 Strikes to me

The Government can go fuck off.

Hey, where's Med O Mao, maybe he'll think this is a good idea, it is right after all up his alley sharing his philosophy of "spreading" the wealth, and his delusional trust in the government.

Though there was a Leftist that had the stupidity to ask who will protect us from the corporations.

I have only one question now, "Is this what you mean by 'protection' from the corporations? And if it is what are you on that you think this is a good thing?

Or maybe, Who will protect us from the government, since it is clear that the government is more interested in protecting the corporations from their stupidity?

Nevermind that's something the leftists agree with, protecting people from their own damn stupidity.
There are differing forms of stupid. You exhibit one form yourself. The "I know everything and everyone else is stupid" is the vainest form of stupidity. I wonder how much do you really know. Do you know how many ants in an ant hill, how many stars in the sky, how many grains of sand on an average beach? Of course you dont, I guess that makes you kind of stupid now, EH?
 

may

Well-Known Member
There are differing forms of stupid. You exhibit one form yourself. The "I know everything and everyone else is stupid" is the vainest form of stupidity.


I will not argue this with one as experienced as yourself.

I wonder how much do you really know. Do you know how many ants in an ant hill,
Ants only pass through the hill and live underground.

how many stars in the sky,
0 The stars are in space not in the sky you silly boy.

how many grains of sand on an average beach? Of course you dont, I guess that makes you kind of stupid now, EH?
They lied to you med your house isn't on the beach that sand is just part of the desert.

[/quote]
 

medicineman

New Member
I will not argue this with one as experienced as yourself.



Ants only pass through the hill and live underground.



0 The stars are in space not in the sky you silly boy.



They lied to you med your house isn't on the beach that sand is just part of the desert.

[/b][/color]
[/quote]
So you actually think this was an answer to a post I made to Brutal? I guess you fit in the last column.

1. Mildly limited intellectual capacity
2. limited intellectual capacity
3. dumbass
4. extremely limited intellectual capacity
5. stupid
6. Fucking idiotically stupid............... Yeah here you are.
 

may

Well-Known Member
So you actually think this was an answer to a post I made to Brutal? I guess you fit in the last column.[/quote

Med you only posted the first column you didn't post the last one, I will post back when you add the last column. keep trying and you could get something right .


1. Mildly limited intellectual capacity
2. limited intellectual capacity
3. dumbass
4. extremely limited intellectual capacity
5. stupid
6. Fucking idiotically stupid...............[/quote]
 

stumps

Well-Known Member
come on Med give him a 5. There was some brain power at work with those answers. lol
 

medicineman

New Member
So you actually think this was an answer to a post I made to Brutal? I guess you fit in the last column.[/quote

Med you only posted the first column you didn't post the last one, I will post back when you add the last column. keep trying and you could get something right .

1. Mildly limited intellectual capacity
2. limited intellectual capacity
3. dumbass
4. extremely limited intellectual capacity
5. stupid
6. Fucking idiotically stupid...............Well now, this is you all the way.


Picky picky picky, Suffice it to say you are in the #6 slot, As far as I know, this is only my opinion, but I see someone else thought you should be in the #5 slot, not me, you are a #6 all the way
 

ilkhan

Well-Known Member
Seems like more of the same debt stacking that got us here in the first place.

However, I like the idea. I think they shouldn't have handed the money to them. They should have come begging the people of the country to bail them out in the first place. "Please Buy our Bonds" "Please Bail us out" See how that would work out for them. Don't ask The government to print up cash we don't have. Maybe we could have a chip in or a "Money Bomb" for GM LOL.

Hell for that matter maybe we should have a chip in for every dept of the Government. You like the Dept of Education give them 100 bucks.
 

NorthwestBuds

Well-Known Member
So you actually think this was an answer to a post I made to Brutal? I guess you fit in the last column.[/quote

Med you only posted the first column you didn't post the last one, I will post back when you add the last column. keep trying and you could get something right .

1. Mildly limited intellectual capacity
2. limited intellectual capacity
3. dumbass
4. extremely limited intellectual capacity
5. stupid
6. Fucking idiotically stupid...............Well now, this is you all the way.


Picky picky picky, Suffice it to say you are in the #6 slot, As far as I know, this is only my opinion, but I see someone else thought you should be in the #5 slot, not me, you are a #6 all the way
I pick #6 too. :hump:
 

TheBrutalTruth

Well-Known Member
There are differing forms of stupid. You exhibit one form yourself. The "I know everything and everyone else is stupid" is the vainest form of stupidity. I wonder how much do you really know. Do you know how many ants in an ant hill, how many stars in the sky, how many grains of sand on an average beach? Of course you dont, I guess that makes you kind of stupid now, EH?

Actually stupidity is not using one's mind/intelligence

Idiocy on the other hand is not having the knowledge or intellectual capacity to make any decisions (or being incapable of acquiring such knowledge)

So as far as being stupid.

If that's your response to my post then I don't even know why I bother trying to argue with you. It's clear from your responses that you haven't the foggiest idea what your philosophy actually stands for and thus are consistently reduced to having to attack the people that attack your philosophy on the grounds that it's imbecilic, stupid, and idiotic.

Now, it's of course imbecilic, because it's routinely pushed by people that are mentally immature, and thus are adequately described as imbeciles.

(Psychology. a person of the second order in a former classification of mental retardation, above the level of idiocy, having a mental age of seven or eight years and an intelligence quotient of 25 to 50.)

It's Stupid, in that one would imagine that people like Gates, Soros, Buffett and Obama who have intelligence would understand that liberty is more valuable than safety, and thus would leave people alone. Of course the above are manipulative con-artists who lie, steal and manipulate others for their own benefit, and thus it can not be surprised that they believe in an imbecilic philosophy that involves stealing from one group for the benefit of the other. It's important to note that their philosophy in no way shape or form involves them giving their wealth to the poor, but involves them stealing the income of others to give to the poor.

And it's of course Idiotic, because only idiots like you Medomao could support it.




Now, don't get me wrong, it's a great philosophy (help others) the problem is that you fucking Pinko-Communist Jock-strap sniffers are saying that your philosophy is "steal from others to help others."

Which really is fucking imbecilic, stupid and idiotic, because it reduces those that you are stealing from to poverty and doesn't help the ones that you are intended to help, because there's a middle man called the government that is taking the vast majority of the money and keeping it for itself.

I thought I already addressed this issue when I showed you that the average cock-sucker in government service makes twice as much as the average private sector employee.

moronic Gaijin, Durak Cobaka, Yob Tvoyu Maht
 
Top