Magical underwear. I could use some.
I take it that means neither of you have the moxie or the insight to tackle the op! LOL
you're assuming the same annual deficit. that deficit will decrease as we return to normal employment, health care costs decrease, etc.
more revenue increases in other area will help as well.
i can't help that you are a retard and set up an impossible loaded question and then marvel at your ability to set up an impossible loaded question.
Dude your thread is stupid..it was either talk about what I want or put up recipes and right now I'm on a diet..again why should I vote for Romney..I like Obama.I think he is more understanding of ALL the people..Now why should I vote for Romney ????
Bucky, listen to what you are saying!
Of course I'm assuming the same annual deficit, but in reality that deficit will actually grow each year!
Are you accounting for that, better yet, give me one year in the last five decades the national debt did not grow.
How in the hell does $1,200billion a year minus $100billion a year balance out. I hope for your sake all these stories about your in-laws being wealthy is true, because you're going to need some financial help my friend.
LOL
I guess you're right, economics is stupid for guys like you!
we went from 1997 - 2001 without raising the debt ceiling.
national debt went down towards the end of clinton's second term.
and no one cares about your "it will grow prediction. that's your opinion, not a fact.
no one ever said it did balance out. your question is as retarded as me starting a thread demanding that someone add 9 to 17 and get 42, then mocking them if they can not. we should be posting pictures of retarded wombats or recipes for a good carrot soup (i have lots of carrots in my freezer, good harvest this year).
add 16 to 98 and tell me how the answer will be 77,731.
I don't know where you get your information but the national debt never once went down during the Clinton years, I'm 100% confident of that.
Speaking of retarded, you and Obama seem to think our economy was booming back then because Clinton raised taxes
Keep in mind that I am not looking for concessions on your part, it's the exposure of your stupidity that motivates me.
you're assuming the same annual deficit. that deficit will decrease as we return to normal employment, health care costs decrease, etc.
more revenue increases in other area will help as well.
i can't help that you are a retard and set up an impossible loaded question and then marvel at your ability to set up an impossible loaded question.
Nope, I'm arguing to balance the budget and lower taxes on businesses and investments!
someone who is probably not a fan of obama just posted a graph that backs up mine. deny reality harder.
Graphs fool a lot of people!
These figures are from the US Treasury.
Fiscal
YearYear
EndingNational Debt Deficit FY1993 09/30/1993 $4.411488 trillion FY1994 09/30/1994 $4.692749 trillion $281.26 billion FY1995 09/29/1995 $4.973982 trillion $281.23 billion FY1996 09/30/1996 $5.224810 trillion $250.83 billion FY1997 09/30/1997 $5.413146 trillion $188.34 billion FY1998 09/30/1998 $5.526193 trillion $113.05 billion FY1999 09/30/1999 $5.656270 trillion $130.08 billion FY2000 09/29/2000 $5.674178 trillion $17.91 billion FY2001 09/28/2001 $5.807463 trillion $133.29 billion
i would say it had more to do with the dot.com boom, but i can see how it is retarded to make the assumption that i think that. good job on calling your assumption about me retarded. i assure you, it is.
If I'm not mistaken, the dotcom bubble was speculative investment boom. I wonder if it's just coincidence that after the capital gains tax was lowered, the boom started? LOL
77,000 +731 = 77,731, prove me wrong. if you can't that exposes your stupidity at mathematics.
Whoa, real groundbreaking stuff there.
Hmm, let's see. You wanna decrease tax revenue and balance the budget, hmmm how would that work? Oh, wait; to make up fir all that lost revenue we can just cut services to the poor and aged. Yes!!! Those damned bloodsucking poor and old people taking all that away from Job Creators.
We'd all be better off if Mitt payed less than 1% on his investments. Because ya know, it will trickle down right?
Do child rapists support Obama?.Now we need to get to the real reason he hates Obama