Brick Top
New Member
Your words were; "cloudy trichomes mean thc is stil being pushed into the bulb."
I responded to what you said. If you do not express yourself clearly then you can expect to have your foibles pointed out and proven wrong based on what you yourself say.
　
Also think of it this way. Based on what you wrote anyone here who read your message and does not/did not know where THC was produced if for some reason they chose to accept what you wrote as being accurate you would have them taught them something inaccurate.
　
Clarity and details. That is what is needed when explaining something.
　
Then again since many people do believe that THC is produced in glands and then rise up the trichome stalk into the resin-head possibly you are one of them and now have only claimed to have meant something totally different than you actually said.
　
Maybe.
Thank you, those were kind words. I have an amazing number of different sites for growing information in favorites folders and some I have saved to Word. It makes it much quicker and easier to respond that way. Especially since in some cases the exact same questions can be and have been asked three or more times in new threads in a single day and more times in preexisting threads. Then having factual information readily available comes in handy. What makes it even better is when something that is obviously factual is posted as opposed to poorly worded statements of opinions it helps to make it clear to most which bit of information is valid and which is not. So I go with it.
And all I did was to point out that the only truly proven to be accurate way to determine when any plant is ready to be harvested is by going by the color of the trichomes.
　
　
So yes I did bring up trichome colors but it was you who brought up THC being forced up into the . what was it you called them "bulbs," yep thats it; "bulbs."
　
Its all clarity and details .. and of course accuracy tossed into the mix helps a whole lot too. At least it does for me.
As I have said, your message, if not just totally inaccurate, was at the least totally misleading to anyone who did not know where THC is produced. So my response was to offer irrefutable proof so there would be no confusion.
　
That seems to have upset you.
If you truly want to help him then teach him to be able to figure things like this out on his own and then be able to pass on the information to someone else who does not know it instead of giving an opinion based on a picture and then information that was either totally inaccurate or totally misleading.
Of course each person may react somewhat different to the exact same substance than someone else will. That has never been mentioned or attempted to be disputed.
　
But there is scientific fact backing up what various main and or key cannabinoids perform.
In your system or in my system they may perform those functions to a slightly different degree but they cannot and will not do them totally different.
THC does what THC does. It may do it to a more major or more minor degree in you or me based on our genetic differences and ages and possibly any number of different things but it will still do what it does as well as it can in whoevers system it is in.
　
The exact same thing goes for CBD and CBN and people do confuse the effects of one for being one or more other things, like confusing a high percentage of CBN for being higher percentages of THC and or CBD when it is higher percentages of THC and CBD (if they want couch-lock) and lower percentages of CBN.
　
You asked; "how does a scientist? you dont know what i think high is, my description of high may be different from your description of high."
　
You implied that possibly your, or someone's, definition of high is the result of high levels of CBN and that a scientist nor anyone else could logically dispute that since their perception and yours, or whoever the other person would be, would not be equals.
Lacking an accepted yardstick to measure by how can anyone say what is really what? That is basically what you said, correct?
Well that would be accurate of you to have said that.
　
But it is still, in a way, misleading.
It implies that taking the lower percentage of THC and CBD route and instead taking the higher percentage CBN route for a couch-lock is as wise as doing the opposite.
Did you not read the proven information I posted or did you simply refuse to accept it?
Regardless of wanting to call it personal preference what you said is totally illogical for anyone who wants the very best herb they can grow.
　
You are advocating trading off the two most important substances when it comes to good pot that has a couch-lock effect for one other substance that is known to not be as desirable.
Where can any small semblance of logic be found in that?
Maybe then you are just one of the poor unfortunates of the world who have not been lucky enough to have experienced a real true high or a real true couch-lock body stone so you lack an accurate accepted yardstick to go by.
You are very welcome, it was a distinct pleasure on my part.
I deeply thank you for so graciously handing me this opportunity to present so many facts and to clear up what may have been a rather considerable amount of confusion.
must be my fucking yardstick, but i cannot get through the ego sorry, my stick must not be long enough
send me some
