friendlyfarmer
Active Member
It seems like every time a seed bank comes into questions multiple people post a link to this page. However, no one ever seems to provide clear evidence that it is fully accurate. Now brick top i know you are not some fool, but hear me out. The only thing that has changed on that page in a year is the date of "update". The ratings have yet to change in quite sometime. Not only that, there are MULTIPLE sites that they rank as reliable that either don't exist or don't even sell seeds! Attitude has the highest rating on there and lately I have seen so so many complaints about attitude that it cannot be the competition's lies alone.
I understand a lot of people swear by attitude but that is heavily reliant on their MTV style of popularity. Many people know Arjan of Greenhouse to be a bit of a crook and liar himself, claiming sole ownership of the original White Widow and whatnot. He at the very least is extremely full of himself and to hear him tell it he has the best genetics that ever existed in the history of all of everything. Yet attitude continues to give them full endorsement and lots of advertising space.
They don't give figures as to how many complaints it takes to knock a company out of the standing, or how many positive reports it takes to put them up there in the first place. They don't give any evidence of post any of their reports either.
In conclusion, seedbankupdate is hardly the reliable ranking system that it was at one time. If BCBD is that much of a problem, why don't these breeding companies have order several of their selections in secret, and officially test them to see whether or not they are legitimate. Otherwise, we have no true way of knowing who the manipulators really are in this situation.
