Benghazi Committee Outs CIA source

UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
I'm not all over the place, you just can't read (or do history well apparently).
Click to expand...
LOL.

this coming from the historian who refuses to walk us through that time and place in history where intelligence was not an advantage, and thus the people in that geographic region failed to evolve from the neck up.

ginwilly said:
Clinton's advisers had been pushing this for years.
Click to expand...
it was a republican bill. it would have been signed into law by bush a year later anyway, moron.
 
Blunted 4 lyfe

Blunted 4 lyfe

Well-Known Member
  • ginwilly said:
    I'm not all over the place, you just can't read (or do history well apparently). I said glass-steagall should have never repealed and Dodd-Frank would have never happened. Now that it has happened it does nothing what we are told it does (par for the course). The same thing you said.
    Click to expand...
ginwilly said:
Clinton's advisers had been pushing this for years. His chief of staff of economics finally convinced him and then left for citibank and made over 100 million. Clintons have always taken care of their buddies.

This link even shows the actual letters if you don't want to be wrong anymore.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/19/wall-street-deregulation-clinton-advisers-obama
Click to expand...
GS was repealed by the pukes, not Clinton, get your facts straight. Presidents cannot repeal any laws congress does that.

Let me explain how this works: We have 3 branches of Government in this country

1) Executive. (President and his cabinet...Sec. State, Sec. Of Defense, Attorney General ...etc...) President signs bills that are passed by the legislative branch into law or he can veto (reject) it.

2) Legislative branch (thats congress the House of representatives and Senate) the laws are presented and passed here and REPEALED here, got that!

3) Judicial branch (Supreme court and Federal appeals court) where laws are interpreted and ruled upon.

Hope this helps you since you seem a bit confused on how laws are made and who repeals them.

B4L
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
Blunted 4 lyfe said:
GS was repealed by the pukes, not Clinton, get your facts straight. Presidents cannot repeal any laws congress does that.

Let me explain how this works: We have 3 branches of Government in this country

1) Executive. (President and his cabinet...Sec. State, Sec. Of Defense, Attorney General ...etc...) President signs bills that are passed by the legislative branch into law or he can veto (reject) it.

2) Legislative branch (thats congress the House of representatives and Senate) the laws are presented and passed here and REPEALED here, got that!

3) Judicial branch (Supreme court and Federal appeals court) where laws are interpreted and ruled upon.

Hope this helps you since you seem a bit confused on how laws are made and who repeals them.

B4L
Click to expand...
You can pull that card if it helps you feel better. Clinton's advisers were pushing for the repeal 4 years before Clinton signed off on it or it was signed into legislature by the pubs.

I posted a link from Clinton's Library that showed the letters, did you read them?

Yes, pubs were instrumental. Clinton signed off on it and his buddies left for citibank and 8 and 9 figure incomes. You can bet the Clintons made a dollar or two of it too.

Stop waving the pom poms and realize both parties are bought and paid for by Wall Street. Maybe we'll actually be able to do something about it.

This all started because I said Hillary was against reinstating because Bill would look bad for signing the law. You seem to take it as a personal attack.

Why do people get so emotionally invested in a political party? It seems really strange. Just a guess, but are you a big reality TV fan too?
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Blunted 4 lyfe

Blunted 4 lyfe

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
You can pull that card if it helps you feel better. Clinton's advisers were pushing for the repeal 4 years before Clinton signed off on it or it was signed into legislature by the pubs.

I posted a link from Clinton's Library that showed the letters, did you read them?

Yes, pubs were instrumental. Clinton signed off on it and his buddies left for citibank and 8 and 9 figure incomes. You can bet the Clintons made a dollar or two of it too.

Stop waving the pom poms and realize both parties are bought and paid for by Wall Street. Maybe we'll actually be able to do something about it.

This all started because I said Hillary was against reinstating because Bill would look bad for signing the law. You seem to take it as a personal attack.

Why do people get so emotionally invested in a political party? It seems really strange. Just a guess, but are you a big reality TV fan too?
Click to expand...
Never watch the stuff I leave that for folks like you.

Are we somehow getting a hissy fit? I just pointed out throwing out barbs need to be based on facts and unfortunately your statements lacked them, don't take it personal the rants you parade as facts are the same type of pablum you hear on Fox and Rush Limpdick.

B4L
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
You can pull that card if it helps you feel better. Clinton's advisers were pushing for the repeal 4 years before Clinton signed off on it or it was signed into legislature by the pubs.

I posted a link from Clinton's Library that showed the letters, did you read them?

Yes, pubs were instrumental. Clinton signed off on it and his buddies left for citibank and 8 and 9 figure incomes. You can bet the Clintons made a dollar or two of it too.

Stop waving the pom poms and realize both parties are bought and paid for by Wall Street. Maybe we'll actually be able to do something about it.

This all started because I said Hillary was against reinstating because Bill would look bad for signing the law. You seem to take it as a personal attack.

Why do people get so emotionally invested in a political party? It seems really strange. Just a guess, but are you a big reality TV fan too?
Click to expand...
Repeal of Glass Steagal
Officially known as Gramm Leach Bliley act
Respective versions of the legislation were introduced in the U.S. Senate by Phil Gramm (Republican of Texas) and in the U.S. House of Representatives by Jim Leach (R-Iowa). The third lawmaker associated with the bill was Rep. Thomas J. Bliley, Jr. (R-Virginia), Chairman of the House Commerce Committee from 1995 to 2001.
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
Repeal of Glass Steagal
Officially known as Gramm Leach Bliley act
Respective versions of the legislation were introduced in the U.S. Senate by Phil Gramm (Republican of Texas) and in the U.S. House of Representatives by Jim Leach (R-Iowa). The third lawmaker associated with the bill was Rep. Thomas J. Bliley, Jr. (R-Virginia), Chairman of the House Commerce Committee from 1995 to 2001.
Click to expand...
LOL, I'm not denying any of that. It was a pub bill to repeal the act, signed into law by Clinton.

The measures you guys will go to to try to keep stink off of Clinton is cute.

I posted a link that showed newly released material discussing this from the Clinton Library. You obviously read none of it.
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
Blunted 4 lyfe said:
Never watch the stuff I leave that for folks like you.

Are we somehow getting a hissy fit? I just pointed out throwing out barbs need to be based on facts and unfortunately your statements lacked them, don't take it personal the rants you parade as facts are the same type of pablum you hear on Fox and Rush Limpdick.

B4L
Click to expand...
lol

I posted a link that was material recently released from the Clinton Library that showed the discussion between Clinton and his advisers starting in 95'. The official government documents.

Now read what you just wrote. wow dude.

Imagine you have never been on this forum and read the exchange. You embarrassed yet? One of us was definitely spewing rhetoric, one of us was posting links to official government documents. Guess which one you were?
 
Blunted 4 lyfe

Blunted 4 lyfe

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
lol

I posted a link that was material recently released from the Clinton Library that showed the discussion between Clinton and his advisers starting in 95'. The official government documents.

Now read what you just wrote. wow dude.

Imagine you have never been on this forum and read the exchange. You embarrassed yet? One of us was definitely spewing rhetoric, one of us was posting links to official government documents. Guess which one you were?
Click to expand...

I already know the Clintons cozy up to wall street big money that wasn't the case here. Making outlandish statements like Clinton repealing GS reminds me of the diatribe you hear on right wing media all the time and folks like yourself swallow that crap up like it's fact. I don't need to be embarrassed I speak with facts supporting my statements unlike yourself.

BTW once again I never posted any links get your facts straight I know that's hard for you to do.

B4L
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
Blunted 4 lyfe said:
I already know the Clintons cozy up to wall street big money that wasn't the case here. Making outlandish statements like Clinton repealing GS reminds me of the diatribe you hear on right wing media all the time and folks like yourself swallow that crap up like it's fact. I don't need to be embarrassed I speak with facts supporting my statements unlike yourself.

BTW once again I never posted any links get your facts straight I know that's hard for you to do.

B4L
Click to expand...
lol, you really can't read and it seems to upset you.

I should have said Clinton signed the repeal and Ms. Clinton refuses to reinstate it because it would make Bill look bad. We can say Clinton balanced the budget though can't we. Does a president actually make the budget?

Is that really different?

I posted the link, you posted the rhetoric. You never read the link or you would have stopped a few posts ago.
 
Blunted 4 lyfe

Blunted 4 lyfe

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
lol, you really can't read and it seems to upset you.

I should have said Clinton signed the repeal and Ms. Clinton refuses to reinstate it because it would make Bill look bad. We can say Clinton balanced the budget though can't we. Does a president actually make the budget?

Is that really different?

I posted the link, you posted the rhetoric. You never read the link or you would have stopped a few posts ago.
Click to expand...
Aaaarrrggghhh!!!!
Forget it Forrest Gump! Good night!

B4L
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Blunted 4 lyfe said:
GS was repealed by the pukes, not Clinton, get your facts straight. Presidents cannot repeal any laws congress does that.

Let me explain how this works: We have 3 branches of Government in this country

1) Executive. (President and his cabinet...Sec. State, Sec. Of Defense, Attorney General ...etc...) President signs bills that are passed by the legislative branch into law or he can veto (reject) it.

2) Legislative branch (thats congress the House of representatives and Senate) the laws are presented and passed here and REPEALED here, got that!

3) Judicial branch (Supreme court and Federal appeals court) where laws are interpreted and ruled upon.

Hope this helps you since you seem a bit confused on how laws are made and who repeals them.

B4L
Click to expand...
<insert retro 'I'm just a bill on Capitol Hill'>
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
You can pull that card if it helps you feel better. Clinton's advisers were pushing for the repeal 4 years before Clinton signed off on it or it was signed into legislature by the pubs.

I posted a link from Clinton's Library that showed the letters, did you read them?

Yes, pubs were instrumental. Clinton signed off on it and his buddies left for citibank and 8 and 9 figure incomes. You can bet the Clintons made a dollar or two of it too.

Stop waving the pom poms and realize both parties are bought and paid for by Wall Street. Maybe we'll actually be able to do something about it.

This all started because I said Hillary was against reinstating because Bill would look bad for signing the law. You seem to take it as a personal attack.

Why do people get so emotionally invested in a political party? It seems really strange. Just a guess, but are you a big reality TV fan too?
Click to expand...
'Pull that card' GW, you mean the law card?

You are the epitome of 1970's Archie bunker meathead. Dead from the neck up.
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
LOL, I'm not denying any of that. It was a pub bill to repeal the act, signed into law by Clinton.

The measures you guys will go to to try to keep stink off of Clinton is cute.

I posted a link that showed newly released material discussing this from the Clinton Library. You obviously read none of it.
Click to expand...
'The measures' in your world are 'the facts' in ours.

Do you nurse without the facts? Aka patients chart?
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
schuylaar said:
'The measures' in your world are 'the facts' in ours.

Do you nurse without the facts? Aka patients chart?
Click to expand...
So you didn't read the link from the Clinton Library either. At least you didn't go off on a rant about it being Fox propaganda. So you got that going for you.

You can remain willfully ignorant and absolve Clinton of the repeal or you can read the years of correspondence between he and his advisers and admit he had a role in it.

Wait a minute, you don't even know what the bill was, did or why we need it, you are still on the Dodd-Frank bandwagon. (Which you don't know what it does either)

You can go back to insults, sorry about that. Didn't mean to suggest you read a link and argue from a place of knowledge, my bad.
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
So you didn't read the link from the Clinton Library either. At least you didn't go off on a rant about it being Fox propaganda. So you got that going for you.

You can remain willfully ignorant and absolve Clinton of the repeal or you can read the years of correspondence between he and his advisers and admit he had a role in it.

Wait a minute, you don't even know what the bill was, did or why we need it, you are still on the Dodd-Frank bandwagon. (Which you don't know what it does either)

You can go back to insults, sorry about that. Didn't mean to suggest you read a link and argue from a place of knowledge, my bad.
Click to expand...
Word vomit distraction, now answer my question.
 
Uncle Ben

Uncle Ben

Well-Known Member
Amazing how the cons, liars, and corrupt people here at RIU will give a pass to one of their own. If Hillary were Republican she would have been crucified by now, certainly not on the campaign trail spewing lies and cackling like the phony scum she is.


 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top