The Democratic establishment and candidates like Hillary Clinton are why there were 6K fewer registered Democrats in NH in 2020 than in 2008. Sanders is why there are 20K more registered Independents/undeclared in NH in 2020, exactly as his campaign's political strategy has been promoting all along
Dude,
That's just campaign spin that you've sucked up and spewed out. None of what you just said about "why" is verified. Show me to be wrong with something from a reputable source.
Fact is, Trump has revved up his own supporters and detractors. That's contained in the article I linked to. Despite all of that, NH didn't have a much better turnout in the Democratic primary. Not enough considering population growth. So what if more are registered as independents? The turnout wasn't all that great. What you are doing is the usual cherry picking of facts. At most, there was a small increase in turnout and you Sanders cultists are blowing horns like the end of the world is nigh.
Given the hype, we can all have a laugh at Bernie eking out a 0.1% margin of victory while garnering a mere 26% of the vote. You should be laughing too because it's really, really funny.
I'm still sticking to my expectation that Bernie is going to have some challenging primaries in more diverse states. I don't think he's going to win the nomination outright, I think more than likely, he will lose to somebody that the more numerous moderates in the party prefer. A contested convention, something I don't want, is not a good scenario for Bernie if it does happen.
You can come back and taunt me if that makes you feel better should my predictions be false. Unlike you, I am ready to vote for Bernie or whoever wins the nomination, be it outright or in a contested convention. Your fears of "rigged" are childish. It didn't happen in 2016 and won't in 2020.