I don't know how you guys came up with the idea that anybody can read a post after it was deleted. I will give you an example the kind of deletion AC is referring to in this post:
The post containing the video was deleted. It was retained in AC's reply. I wanted to read what Phist said and all I got was "oops, not found". If you need me to quote what phist says in deleted posts, then you are both setting a standard that non-mods can't meet.
BTW, because it remained in AC's reply, I was able to listen to Warren's speech. I agree with her. I agree with AC, Warren was not hysterical, which is what phist was claiming when he said this:
I don't know how you guys came up with the idea that anybody can read a post after it was deleted. I will give you an example of what AC is referring to this post:
The post containing the video -- that is fortunately retained in AC's reply -- was deleted. I wanted to read what Phist said and all I got was "oops, not found". If you need me to quote what phist says in deleted posts, then you are both setting a standard that non-mods can't meet.
BTW, because it remained in AC's reply, I was able to listen to Warren's speech. I agree with her. I agree with AC, Warren was not hysterical, which is what phist was claiming when he said this:
Also, please note the reference to veto in the national review's headline. I refused to open that link too. It is a right wing propaganda site. Anything coming from that site is suspect.
My apologies to other users of this site. Two people demanded proof that statements were deleted. I hope that they don't try to use that kind of bs again.