This recent thread is a good start: https://www.rollitup.org/seed-strain-reviews/749091-looking-good-genetics-try-here.htmlHi I was wondering what the best seed companies are.
That's for sure. I think Attitude seedbank lists around 125 different brands, and there are quite a number of other brands that they don't stock. Plus there is a whole thriving market in what might be termed "pollen chucks"; ie small batches of crosses created by individual small growers. Probably better to stay away from those as a new grower.There are so many now that it's hard to choose from.
Yes, there are consistent lines with minimal pheno variation. What you're looking for are called INBRED lines. These have been specifically bred for uniformity.Also are there any plants that don't have a bunch of phenos?
This is true. Simon from "serious" se-eds is a "serious" breeder, and he's been working his individual lines for many many years, with uniformity being one of his stated goals. Thats' one of the reasons that after 20+ years, he still only offers a small handful of different lines.Serious seeds fem beans are all pretty uniform when grown out.
I think this depends on which breeders you're talking about, but its true that lots of them sell unworked direct crosses and call that a "strain". If you want to find stable/inbred lines, you certainly can, you just have to look for those.Most breeders nowadays just sell f1s so your almost always going to get phenos that are different, thats why you pop the whole pack to select the best for a keeper.
It's pretty amazing seeing real F1s next to polyhybrids.This is true. Simon from "serious" se-eds is a "serious" breeder, and he's been working his individual lines for many many years, with uniformity being one of his stated goals. Thats' one of the reasons that after 20+ years, he still only offers a small handful of different lines.
I think this depends on which breeders you're talking about, but its true that lots of them sell unworked direct crosses and call that a "strain". If you want to find stable/inbred lines, you certainly can, you just have to look for those.
You also generally have to be satisfied with older lines. I think a lot of newer growers naturally gravitate towards the latest/"greatest" thing, assuming that anything bred in 2012 has to be better than something bred in 1998, or even 1988, even if it isn't really true.
*TRUE* F1s, that is to say offspring of a cross between two different inbred lines, are usually not only stable, but also quite vigorous plants, due to heterosis ("hybrid vigor"). Some breeders do offer these, though I think exactly as you say, many more just find two hybrids they like, then cross those to create offspring with a mishmash of traits.
Full credit to the genetics. One hundred percent Bodhi's work. I just gave it a soil it didn't like much and some excellent lighting. I fucked up and it looks like that. Full credit to the genetics mate. One hundred percent. If it wasn't for my stupidity, it would look even BETTER.That sure is a magnificent weed plant with sugared trichs cascading down to the leaves. Credit goes to the strain itself, the grower, or both?
Agreed. I'm a big fan of serious seeds. I've grown out AK-47, The Chronic, Bubblegum, and Kali Mist from seed. A lot of uniformity in their lines. I wish that they wouldn't have fucked with Kali Mist, but I'm still a customer of their's either way. Simon is also a nice guy that is willing to answer questions in a professional manner. I know that this doesn't mean anything as it relates to genetics, but I am much more apt to support a company that has a decent chap at the helm as opposed to some douche-nozzle like Swerve with CC.This is true. Simon from "serious" se-eds is a "serious" breeder, and he's been working his individual lines for many many years, with uniformity being one of his stated goals. Thats' one of the reasons that after 20+ years, he still only offers a small handful of different lines.
I think this depends on which breeders you're talking about, but its true that lots of them sell unworked direct crosses and call that a "strain". If you want to find stable/inbred lines, you certainly can, you just have to look for those.
You also generally have to be satisfied with older lines. I think a lot of newer growers naturally gravitate towards the latest/"greatest" thing, assuming that anything bred in 2012 has to be better than something bred in 1998, or even 1988, even if it isn't really true.
*TRUE* F1s, that is to say offspring of a cross between two different inbred lines, are usually not only stable, but also quite vigorous plants, due to heterosis ("hybrid vigor"). Some breeders do offer these, though I think exactly as you say, many more just find two hybrids they like, then cross those to create offspring with a mishmash of traits.
Well, you're keeping it alive, and it doesn't look bad at all. Bodhi's genetics have usually thrived for me, even when circumstances were not their best in my garden. It's true that there are usually less phenotypes in Bodhi's F1s, he generally does not use many F1 males, and he also tends to look for males that pass on characteristics like improved structure, yield, or frost, without dominating a cross. At most, you will find phenotypes that resemble the mother, or the mother's parents, and any that are truly male-dominant are pretty rare. Usually one or two appalachia or snow lotus dominant hybrids will turn up in a pack, but the vast majority will either take after the mother or a fusion of both. Appalachia is much more dominant in the crosses than snow lotus, but with the genetics being (Green Crack x Tres Dawg) this is not a bad thing.Full credit to the genetics. One hundred percent Bodhi's work. I just gave it a soil it didn't like much and some excellent lighting. I fucked up and it looks like that. Full credit to the genetics mate. One hundred percent. If it wasn't for my stupidity, it would look even BETTER.
I fully believe a breeder's personality will show in his work, and this holds true for all of us with our trades. SwerveI know that this doesn't mean anything as it relates to genetics, but I am much more apt to support a company that has a decent chap at the helm as opposed to some douche-nozzle like Swerve with CC.