Hey folks, using bags produced by a local company. Heard good things.
The sizes are 220,160,90,73, and 25.
I added roughly 2oz dry trim and performed the extraction. The results were discouraging but here's what I got;
Most of the trim was flower, almost no sugar leaves. Highly resinous, and the weed going in (Afghan Kush in this case) was well grown.
After extraction, I got next to nothing in the 160, got .5g from the 90. Absolutely nothing in the 73. Nothing. Then, 2g in the 25. So I thought well, I have .5g of something decent.
However, I did collect all of the 25 and dried it out. It was very dark whereas the 90 was amber colored. But, smoking it revealed better potency (worse taste) than the 90. Matter of fact, lately when I reach for a hit of hash, I reach for the 25 which is supposed to be shit.
But, it occurred to me that the spacing of the bags was rather unconventional.
So for example, after the 160 bag, it goes to 90. That means everything between 90 and 160 is collected in the 90 bag. A lot of people use a 120 in between 160 and 90 which to me would seem to provide for a more consistent concentrate.
Now, if you go to 73, you would only get between 73-89. There was nothing there. But, looking at the 25 which many regard as low quality (or I saw someone on these forums call it, "outright horseshit"), it occurred to me that the 25 had 72-25 particulates. A lot of people have a bag here say, 50 microns. In that scenario I'd get 50-25 so less yield of course. Perhaps a lot of what is making the 25 so good is a large amount of 70ish stuff that never got collected in the 73.
In any case, I thought it odd to pull out 2.5g but not even any color at all in the 73. I may try some different mesh specs or add a bag and see what happens. I've extracted bubble hash before so I'm not an idiot, but I am also not well trained or read on the subject.
Thoughts?
PS- props to Matt Rize. I had been looking around and saw some of his stuff on this forum and can say that without him, there'd be a lot less hash smoking going on
The sizes are 220,160,90,73, and 25.
I added roughly 2oz dry trim and performed the extraction. The results were discouraging but here's what I got;
Most of the trim was flower, almost no sugar leaves. Highly resinous, and the weed going in (Afghan Kush in this case) was well grown.
After extraction, I got next to nothing in the 160, got .5g from the 90. Absolutely nothing in the 73. Nothing. Then, 2g in the 25. So I thought well, I have .5g of something decent.
However, I did collect all of the 25 and dried it out. It was very dark whereas the 90 was amber colored. But, smoking it revealed better potency (worse taste) than the 90. Matter of fact, lately when I reach for a hit of hash, I reach for the 25 which is supposed to be shit.
But, it occurred to me that the spacing of the bags was rather unconventional.
So for example, after the 160 bag, it goes to 90. That means everything between 90 and 160 is collected in the 90 bag. A lot of people use a 120 in between 160 and 90 which to me would seem to provide for a more consistent concentrate.
Now, if you go to 73, you would only get between 73-89. There was nothing there. But, looking at the 25 which many regard as low quality (or I saw someone on these forums call it, "outright horseshit"), it occurred to me that the 25 had 72-25 particulates. A lot of people have a bag here say, 50 microns. In that scenario I'd get 50-25 so less yield of course. Perhaps a lot of what is making the 25 so good is a large amount of 70ish stuff that never got collected in the 73.
In any case, I thought it odd to pull out 2.5g but not even any color at all in the 73. I may try some different mesh specs or add a bag and see what happens. I've extracted bubble hash before so I'm not an idiot, but I am also not well trained or read on the subject.
Thoughts?
PS- props to Matt Rize. I had been looking around and saw some of his stuff on this forum and can say that without him, there'd be a lot less hash smoking going on