UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
The stats you provided were not prosecuted under federal law (DOJ) skippy.
prove it then.
The stats you provided were not prosecuted under federal law (DOJ) skippy.
Hispanic/Latino = white?
Funny thing. I had never heard of stormfront.
I checked it out.
Those folks aren't afraid of facts like you and your lib-tard amigos are. Ya'll are scared of anything that doesn't fit your narrative.
Anyway, after reading their goals, I donated $50.
So in a round-about way, you are responsible for part of their funding.
did you click the link? 77.9% of the US population, white alone. yet only 62% of hate crimes.
see my post about rates.
I did click the link. The Census Bureau considers "white" people to include Hispanic/Latino people. White alone, not Hispanic/Latino, is 63% of the population, not 77.9% of the population. It's on the same exact chart.
doesn't change the calculation much, blacks are still prosecuted at a higher rate.
but it's not surprising to see that you abide by the one drop rule, rather than how people choose to self-identify.
Uh, Buck, the Hispanic/Latino category is the self-identification. The Census Bureau sticks them together.
there are two categories: white alone, and white alone with no hispanic/latino descent.
16.9% + 63% =/= 77.9%.
check again.
there are two categories: white alone, and white alone with no hispanic/latino descent.
16.9% + 63% =/= 77.9%.
check again.
It really doesn't matter, Eric Holders DOJ never charged or prosecuted them.
prove it then.
proving that none of the 1,150 hate crimes in 2009 alone were not prosecuted by holder's DOJ seems like quite the task. get to it, ferry.
You could destroy his assertion by posting just 1.
too facile, i'll just watch him squirm around like the little stuck weasel he is.
prove it then.
proving that none of the 1,150 hate crimes in 2009 alone were not prosecuted by holder's DOJ seems like quite the task. get to it, ferry.
awww, poor baby.
did i destroy your narrative of white persecution? anti-white racism under holder's DOJ?
you made the claim that more blacks were prosecuted under Holder's DOJ than were whites.
awww, poor baby.
did i destroy your narrative of white persecution? anti-white racism under holder's DOJ?
oh, i'm so sorry baby.
go back to stormfront, you don't have to worry about facts over there.
The stats you provided were not prosecuted under federal law (DOJ) skippy.
But the white guy charged a couple of weeks ago was, so you fail, miserably.
Look to the left, even Hillary's laughing at your puck ass.
my claim, as stated verbatim: black people are charged with hate crimes at a higher rate than white people are.
your claim, as stated verbatim:Eric Holders DOJ never charged or prosecuted them. ("them" refers to the 1,150 blacks charged with hate crimes in 2009 alone)
i've already proven my claim mathematically.
now you need to prove your claim that holder's DOJ has NEVER charged or prosecuted a black person with a hate crime.
get cracking, you endless pile of fail.
my claim, as stated verbatim: black people are charged with hate crimes at a higher rate than white people are.
your claim, as stated verbatim:Eric Holders DOJ never charged or prosecuted them. ("them" refers to the 1,150 blacks charged with hate crimes in 2009 alone)
i've already proven my claim mathematically.
now you need to prove your claim that holder's DOJ has NEVER charged or prosecuted a black person with a hate crime.
get cracking, you endless pile of fail.
Post #20
now you need to prove your claim that holder's DOJ has NEVER charged or prosecuted a black person with a hate crime.
get cracking, you endless pile of fail.
Buck, you replied too quick to have watched Holder's own words so willful ignorance it is.