Bring back the draft

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
no i exaggerated a solution for dumbass teenagers consenting to decisions we all know they consented to, but will live to regret. you just twisted in a really abstract way
13 year olds do not have the wherewithal to consent to have sex with adults. You're a peculiar one.
 

ASCIIGHOST

Well-Known Member
no i had to look the up defintion of wherewithal, and it said the "money or other means needed for a particular purpose."
so i just want to know what means you think a teenager is lacking. 17 is same as 13 as far as legality goes. if you want to actually fight pedophilia culture, try Afghanistan. youre literally wasting your energy here, and everyone knows it, you just trying to look better, because you cant form complete thoughts to counter argue anything.
 

ASCIIGHOST

Well-Known Member
What the fuck is up with all these fucking pedophiles? any man who thinks a 13 year old can consent to having sex with an adult is a fucking pedo. We have laws against that shit.
can they consent with another 13 year old or say 15 year old?
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
What the fuck is up with all these fucking pedophiles? any man who thinks a 13 year old can consent to having sex with an adult is a fucking pedo. We have laws against that shit.
Now he's going full kkk with the anticommunism stuff. I bet there's a correlation between racism, inbreeding and pedophilia.
 

ASCIIGHOST

Well-Known Member
You actually are trying to defend that a 13 year old can consent to sex with an adult. We have nothing to discuss you freaking pedo.
i never used the word adult, you 4 want to gang rape me is all. you all live in homoerotic words attempting to control the natives of the forum. there is nothing to discuss, youre right.
 

ASCIIGHOST

Well-Known Member
Now he's going full kkk with the anticommunism stuff. I bet there's a correlation between racism, inbreeding and pedophilia.
i bet there is a correlation between 20 year enslavement, homoeroticism, and the lack of relationship with your father. absent male attention from your deployments, no doubt your offspring will embrace homosexuality, and natural selection will continue its course.
 

ASCIIGHOST

Well-Known Member
He doesn't even know what wherewithal means, so I'm sure consent is a foreign concept to him.
The unclebuck homoerotic crew uses the same language over and over, so i simply ask what means they lack. what are you referring to them lacking that allows them to consent. an exhausted wife could lack the wherewithall to consent to sex after an exhausting day of work. her means that are lacking would be the physical energy. i just want you to explain what means are lacking, im not a big psychological person. i want to operate by your terms so i know where you stand. im totally against 18 with 13. they have nothing in common, they are not peers.
 

see4

Well-Known Member
ascii, based on everything you've said so far, it most certainly appears to me that you enjoy the sexual company of young children. and that sir, is disgusting.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
What the fuck is up with all these fucking pedophiles? any man who thinks a 13 year old can consent to having sex with an adult is a fucking pedo. We have laws against that shit.
it's sickening how these "libertarians" think.

they seem to think liberty means white males get to fuck little boys and kick black people out of their stores for being black.

@desert dude , why do you identify with a party that supports pedophilia?
 

see4

Well-Known Member
ascii, based on everything you've said so far, it most certainly appears to me that you enjoy the sexual company of young children. and that sir, is disgusting.
upload_2015-10-13_21-28-14.png

Ok good, now you've established you're a cowardly liar too.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
I disagree. I believed then that I was fighting for freedom.

In fairness to you, I'll agree that you probably did think that when you were a soldier boy. Now that you realize you weren't fighting for freedom, good for you on your awakening. Too bad you couldn't be more consistent though.

Why not just admit that you STILL support governments taking money from people forcibly and handing it over to you? It's obvious that's what happens.



you renounce your service, and citizenship? oooooooooooo, im gonna tell on you
He hasn't renounced the use of force to fund him though. He's fighting hard to have it both ways and carve out an exception for himself to do what he says others shouldn't.

He implies he wants a world where people don't have systemic power over others, then keeps on cashing the checks...checks derived from that which he says he opposes. A very dizzy and circular argument he has going there.
 
Top