Lady(ies), gentlemen, and those that identify with a gender other than what they were born as:
Been a RUI member for over 1 yr. now and still don't have enough posts under my belt to "like" or PM since I learned early it's easier to learn if you're not talking, but I would like to chime in on this. (Speaking of which, has anyone thought that that post level requirement might contribute slightly to the noise level? Just a thought.)
Whilst it can be in the best interest of site owners/operators to change some things to retain appeal and site visits, some things can't be changed due to software limitations and some things won't be changed due to a plethora of reasons ranging from ease of administration to keeping the general member populace happy to ultimately revenue generation which keeps this site available to be visited.
When finding a particular "feature" that some members feel cumbersome and could be changed to alleviate that feeling a member has 2 choices:
1.) Ask site admins for the change.
I believe this has been done (Congrats Sunni BTW!) and the reasons have been furnished as to why it probably won't happen.
2.) DIY MFs!
Much in the way the DIY LED community has sprung up to fill a void in the one area growing technology it can REALLY change the efficiency of, maybe it's time for those preeminent in LED research to invest in building a site just for that advanced study with things like OP forever editing and posts readable but posting features available by invite only or membership level status (Hmmm.....sounds a bit like the RUI PM/like dealy
).
I don't suggest that anyone leave RUI (PLEASE DO NOT! I have so much
more to learn from you all!), but suggest a method to allow the higher level of DIY LED research to advance amongst the the cognoscenti so findings and new tools can be posted here by them as a fiat accompli sort of deal. I'm all for anything that helps LED tech (like efficiency) excel because my parents instilled in me the belief that waste = evil.
All it takes is time and money.
Heck, there's probably at least a dozen out-of-work RUI members from the IT profession that could spin up a LAMP site server with all the features sought (I'm a big fan of Drupal myself) if someone(s) wanted to pony up hosting fees since the software is free.
It just seems strange that a DIY community is asking for changes when that type of group is the one pushing the envelope and waiting for industries and communities to catch up or even forming new industries and communities in addition to the ones they are already a part of enriching both with new content.
Look, I'm skirting the edge of bannage here as this type of suggestion historically violates TOS, but it just seems common sense to me that if you can't get what you want by using a already built product (site), DIY.
No criticism of either this site, nor the posters thereof, should be inferred by my suggestion.