Can we get rid of STDs by labeling the drivers license?
- Thread starter Nevaeh420
- Start date
Nevaeh420
Well-Known Member
Like I said, to make it fair, what I would do is just mark the back of the license with a (green) hologram to indicate that that person is STD free. So anyone that had an STD or didnt want to partake in My program, could just have a regular ID. This way, you would KNOW the last time a STD free person was tested and clean of any STDs. If the person didnt want to partake in My program, or has an STD, they would have a regular ID. To make it fair.
How would this be"violating the privacy of the entire population"?
~PEACE~
ChingOwn
Well-Known Member
Im pretty sure we cured AIDS back in 2011 and what about love thats one STD they will never cure I would definitely like to see if someone has that shit on there drivers license
Nevaeh420
Well-Known Member
If we indeed did cure AIDS, Im sure that would be a novel effulgence for most people on here, if you can PROVE that.
Can you PROVE that we have a cure to AIDS? because thats new to Me and Im sure to a lot of other bloggers on here.
How is "love" a STD?
~PEACE~
fandango
Well-Known Member
Should work great...if you check the perp after every friday night outing!
Nevaeh420
Well-Known Member
I believe if people got checked every year or so, and if it was labeled clean on their ID, it would totally get rid of STDs in a few generations.
I dont believe anyone wants to catch a STD, so this is a great way to protect yourself from contracting a STD. At least you would KNOW the last time a person was clean of any STDs, and chances are, they still would be clean within a year of the test.
People would unequivocally have the chance to participate in My program or not, it wouldnt be mandatory. I believe I could save millions of people from getting a STD if My plan was implemented. Its a really good idea, the politicians just need to pass a law.
~PEACE~
People who fuck others on a whim are the ones who are subjected to such things.
I've only banged my wife and she me. Funny, neither one of us have an STD. Weird how that worked out.
Just because it smiles and makes you feel funny, doesn't mean you should fuck it. And if you do without taking proper steps to ensure your safety, then whatever happens to you is your fucking problem, period. You willingly shoved your shit in there without really knowing, and now you have a lifetime of dick rot and stink pink.
Ah damn.
Why do some of you feel the fucking government needs to label people to fix this problem? Government cant fix STUPID, so maybe stop fucking people you don't know would be the best alternative.
I've only banged my wife and she me. Funny, neither one of us have an STD. Weird how that worked out.
Just because it smiles and makes you feel funny, doesn't mean you should fuck it. And if you do without taking proper steps to ensure your safety, then whatever happens to you is your fucking problem, period. You willingly shoved your shit in there without really knowing, and now you have a lifetime of dick rot and stink pink.
Ah damn.
Why do some of you feel the fucking government needs to label people to fix this problem? Government cant fix STUPID, so maybe stop fucking people you don't know would be the best alternative.
tyler.durden
Well-Known Member
If you want to convince people of such an outlandish belief, show the math. Why would STDs be wiped out in a few generations? How many currently have STDs, how many new people contract STDs in an average year, how many less people do you propose would contract STDs the first year of your program, second year, third year and why?
Chances are? Show us the chances of someone being clean within a year of the test. How would the chances differ from one week after the test, 4 weeks, 16 weeks, on the 52nd week? If you have no idea what the math is, you can't intelligently speak about the chances. You need the math of the projected results before politicians, or anyone, would listen to your idea...
You start a thread on why your idea would work, but you don't include any evidence of why it would work. You have no math/stats to show us, so you just want us to take it on faith (which doesn't fare well in this sub-forum). At the same time you completely ignore the reasons other members thoughtfully post on why this idea would not work. It is a small wonder why you do not learn and have such trouble understanding even basic concepts and information. Guess it's back to the children's table for you...
Nevaeh420
Well-Known Member
You can ask google some of these questions.
And for the questions that google cant answer; My plan and program would have to be implemented, and then tested in order to get deductions, conclusions, and data.
Some things are impossible to deduct data from, unless tested.
~PEACE~
tyler.durden
Well-Known Member
Here you go again asking others to do the homework for your lazy ass. I'm asking YOU because it's YOUR plan and YOUR thread, you dolt. You have no idea how the world works; we don't implement any old hair-brained scheme and THEN see if it works, it has to have solid reason and data to show that it would most likely work and only then is it carefully implemented. You'd first need the statistics of how things are now before you can project future stats, for without current stats, how would we know why and where things need improvement. This is why running the world is left to adults, not mentally ill children with neat-o ideas...
kpmarine
Well-Known Member
Exactly! If you're trusting someone enough to lock genitals, then you shouldn't have to check an ID.
Also, woo! I'm a sig comment! Moving on up in the world.
Nevaeh420
Well-Known Member
I would rather feel awkward for a minute then have a STD for life.
What about you guys?
~PEACE~
kpmarine
Well-Known Member
Do you card the women you have sex with to verify age?
Nevaeh420
Well-Known Member
I guess you could.
Normally, thats not a problem unless youre hanging out with the younger generation.
But My point is that no one has the right to spread an STD, and My plan/program would unequivocally decrease the chances of catching an STD.
~PEACE~
tyler.durden
Well-Known Member
He stated with absolutely no evidence or logic whatsoever...
Beefbisquit
Well-Known Member
Everyone has the right to choose who they sleep with too.
In your scenario the means don't justify the end.
We could end war, STD's, famine, and crime if there was one dictator who controlled the entire world and kept every citizen locked in a cage for their entire life too, doesn't mean it's a good idea. Dumbass.
Have you ever heard of privacy? What if you're asexual, have no intention of ever having sex with anyone, and you were born with herpes because of your mother? Why should that person be subjected to having a piece of ID with their medical records on it because you don't want to have to ask girls 'tough questions'?
Nevaeh420
Well-Known Member
You obviously forgot when I told you that, instead of labeling people with an STD, we should ONLY label the STD free people, the people that are clean most likely wouldnt be mind being labeled as STD free.
Anyone would have the option of opting out of My plan/program, even the clean people. That way, no one is being discriminated. The people with an STD would have just an ordinary ID, no labeling.
There wouldnt be any "medical records" on a persons ID. There would only be a hologram if they are STD free. Everyone would have the choice to opt out of My program, no one would be forced to be labeled as STD free, either.
I think this would be totally fair to the people with or without any STDs.
I know in the OP, I said that we should label the people with STDs, but I changed My mind to be totally fair to everyone. This way, there is no discrimation to anyone, if you have an STD or dont want to participate in My program, then you will get an ordinary ID.
~PEACE~
Beefbisquit
Well-Known Member
So, in that system you don't have to apply to the program, but if you don't everyone will know.... nice. Seems legit.
Wait, what?
Well-Known Member
Shouldn't there be a color code? How do we know if it's the gay AIDS or the straight AIDS?