Cant You Vacuum Distill SUPER PURE Hash Oil?!

Marzfisch

New Member
Google it people! according to google, if i spend around $800 for all the laboratory glassware and what not, for vacuum distillation, and i grind herb (or shake or trim) very fine and mix with D-Limonene which has a higher boiling point than THC. put this slurry into a 5000ml boiling flask, and under correct vacuum and heat, you can literally boil out nearly all the THC out of this slurry and recondense it in another vile. The ending result should be SUPER PURE Hash oil! and next to no THC will be thrown away because you can just boil it all out until no more will collect.
 

vacpurge

New Member
I thought when you heated THC up that much it changed it to THCA, or decarboxylates it or something?? id like to see it done..
 

Marzfisch

New Member
I thought when you heated THC up that much it changed it to THCA, or decarboxylates it or something?? id like to see it done..
Wrong, THCA decarboxilates into THC. but not under this circumstance because its under a vacuum lower than normal atmospheric pressure.
 

vacpurge

New Member
even under a vacuum, the boiling point of THC lowers too. at 29.92 vacuum, the boiling point of THC is something like 10 degrees or something isnt it? or around 80 degrees at 29.0" ???
 

Marzfisch

New Member
And the reason D-Limonene is used in this method, the cannabinoids boil off out of the D-limonene, and recondenses elsewhere because it has a higher boiling point than THC. This leaves the D-Limonene behind and extracts nearly all the active cannabinoids.
 

Marzfisch

New Member
so whats the point of this thread then?

sounds like oilmkr is back with a different account.
Why would i make an additional account and post something so unrelated to my topic of this thread?

And the point of this thread is to share this information and in an attempt to get more information on this technique.

the whole thing is rediculous
Your uneducated asinine objection is rediculous... why do you think so?
 

qwizoking

Well-Known Member
well for a few reasons i suppose the biggest is that your still purcgasing and using solvent along with a vaccum, might as well get the same product WITHOUT damaging thc in the process. distilling something and using different boiling points is not a new thought sorry, if it was effective everyone would be doing it.. i personally do a qwiso then winterize then the hexane saline wash. besides being 790 dollars cheaper im not harming my thc by boiling it and i still retain a large amount of terpines.second your arrogance and the wa you talk kind of rubs me the wrong way
 

qwizoking

Well-Known Member
well for a few reasons i suppose the biggest is that your still purcgasing and using solvent along with a vaccum, might as well get the same product WITHOUT damaging thc in the process. distilling something and using different boiling points is not a new thought sorry, if it was effective everyone would be doing it.. i personally do a qwiso then winterize then the hexane saline wash. besides being 790 dollars cheaper im not harming my thc by boiling it and i still retain a large amount of terpines.second your arrogance and the wa you talk kind of rubs me the wrong way.
 
I've come to the conclusion, that the reason people blast (make BHO etc.) is that what they are growing in bud form. Or even regular hash, just isn't that tasty or potent...
 

Marzfisch

New Member
well for a few reasons i suppose the biggest is that your still purcgasing and using solvent along with a vaccum, might as well get the same product WITHOUT damaging thc in the process. distilling something and using different boiling points is not a new thought sorry, if it was effective everyone would be doing it.. i personally do a qwiso then winterize then the hexane saline wash. besides being 790 dollars cheaper im not harming my thc by boiling it and i still retain a large amount of terpines.second your arrogance and the wa you talk kind of rubs me the wrong way.
Again your lack of knowledge and your overconfidence in what knowledge you do have is making you look bad. First your using not one but TWO dangerous chemicals and second, there is a TON of wasted product thrown away. Third, your method still has all kinds of pollutants compared to vacuum distilling it. Fourth of all, when under vacuum less than atmospheric pressure, boiling THC will not destroy ANY of it. The end product will have not even microscopic pieces of plant matter, and less than %5 pollutants compared to your 20%-60%. Using this technique, you can safely remove the precious active compounds and not throw away any cannabnoids in the end. No waste, ability to produce ounces of oil a day from material already dry sieved and to some rendered useless. this enables an incredibly pure product fit for patients that have very delicate respiratory and digestive systems due to poor health. and for the price, what's $800 for a setup that will produce pounds and pounds of very pure, nontoxic, ALL NATURAL oil even from vaporized or already smoked stuff, not to mention the countless pounds of shake it will process. $800 or even more is well worth it on this budget. fuck man it will pay for itself the first extraction I do...
 

Marzfisch

New Member
I've come to the conclusion, that the reason people blast (make BHO etc.) is that what they are growing in bud form. Or even regular hash, just isn't that tasty or potent...
I TOTALLY agree! we dry sieve our shake and trim, and most people around here throw that stuff in the compost or back in their beds after dry sieving or dry ice processing, but we still see precious active cannabinoids! Hence, our new hash oil technique.
If there is %5 THC in a pound of shake after being dry sieved, there is a MINIMUM VALUE of $600 in oil. easily more!
And our shake is still nice and frosty after being dry sieved. so $600 per pound is very low estimation.
 

650baquet

Active Member
I've come to the conclusion, that the reason people blast (make BHO etc.) is that what they are growing in bud form. Or even regular hash, just isn't that tasty or potent...
not true for everybody, but yes...i have a fairly scraggly plant coming up and i'm turning the whole dang thing into concentrate, prolly QWEt. I know it's not going to be quite as potent as my other plants and i'm def not going to want to smoke it and clog up my lungs anymore than i have to. So i'll vape what i do want to save. I've also started to switch to mainly vaporizing due to my lungs feeling more backed up recently...normally i hit the bong all day long. So i feel solvent extracts are a great way for ppl who need to concentrate material that they would rather not smoke in raw form...i've thought of the fact, though, that since i've started making concentrates am i going to get lazy on the growing part knowing i can just concentrate everything anyways???
Well hasn't happened to me yet and i don't feel like it will, but i can see how a noobi grower just might feel that way "hey why worry about growing uber dank bud when i can just concentrate it"...but hopefully that person will then realize that the better the bud the better the concentrates.

I feel ya though
 

qwizoking

Well-Known Member
well im glad you think youve found the best thing since sliced bread (i actually like to cut my own so i have different sizes but whatever) but i suggest you do alot more research.. you can get a filter syringe in varying sizes to get rid of mold, plant matter etc. i was under the impression that thc was fairly sensitive and heat light oxygen chlorine, any oxidizer etc. so why does this method not degrade thc. since you know so much you should help me with my cdlsa quest

how do we have 20-60percent pollutants, i would appreciate it if you would be a bit more specific. your answers teally arent scirntifically sound
 

Marzfisch

New Member
Qwizoking... oh my god... your hopeless... i don't even know where to start with you... like I'm dumbfounded... I guess all i can do for this threat is straighten up the meaning of arrogance...
Definition of ARROGANT

1
: exaggerating or disposed to exaggerate one's own worth or importance often by an overbearing manner <an arrogantofficial>

2
: showing an offensive attitude of superiority : proceeding from or characterized by arrogance <an arrogant reply>

Synonyms
haughtiness, insolence, disdain.


Antonyms
humility, modesty, diffidence.


&#8212; ar·ro·gant·ly adverb

I bid you guys farewell, and i hope someone, somewhere, will find this thread and be educated enough to understand.

-Marzfisch
 

qwizoking

Well-Known Member
lol yea i figured it out, dont people have something better to do than argue with people on the internet.why did you put the definition? we all know what it means. you sound very arrogant, misguided and unintelligentto anyone reading this or anything else, dont rely on something with no scientific background always do research into any extraction you are doing and the reason the extraction works, understand what your doing. look up polar/non polar and a/b extractions to become familiar then educate your self on the chemicals your using..lab/food/reagent grade is what you want.sorry started rambling
 
Top