cogitech
Well-Known Member
I was thinking I would run the COBs all the time, and then only run the "veg" switch on the blurple for veg, and only the "bloom" switch for flowering. That would only be an extra 100 (real) watts coming from the blurple, and it would be much more diffused light than the COBs. I'll have to mull it over. Perhaps just best to sell the blurple... I dunno.You'll be rocking it without the need for the blurple. You're already at 36 watts a sq foot with the COBs which is good. The blurples would be too much on top of that.
Point taken. I do have some ideas on how to diffuse the light with minimal loss, but I want to test it before I let the cat out of the bag. Hint; the solution shThe only way to really diffuse an LED (without adding more LEDs) is with some kind of optic/cover over the light. A lense will diffuse the light, but no where near as good as a frosted acrylic cover would. The lense eats 5-10% of the photons, frosted acrylic/glass would be like 15-20% loss. If the loss was worth the diffusion gains in a reflective mylar tent using already fairly diffused light by having multiple light sources (it isnt) then everyone would be using diffusers on their LEDs. But say you have a parallel strip build: if you want more diffusion you simply slap another strip on the light. Strip costs $14 and heatsink $5.
Thanks! I'll give that a read shortly.This article explains the benefits of diffused light. And diffused light makes a biiiig difference in terms of photosynthetic efficiency and canopy penetration. I saw a photo of a guy that had 2 cobs @ 100w each in a small closest (maybe 2x4) and it was his veg room. Literally was completely shaded only a few inches below the canopy.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4559655/
Last edited: