China will make USA pay very high price ...Rand Report

vostok

vostok

Well-Known Member

China has launched naval exercises in the area of the Paracel Islands on July 5. China is expected to fight for the affiliation of the islands at the Court of Arbitration in the Hague.

The adequate lawsuit was filed by the Philippine government in 2015. Vietnam, Brunei, Malaysia and Taiwan also have their claims for the disputed islands. China believes that the case of the disputed islands was initiated with the support of the United States. China refuses to recognize the jurisdiction of The Hague in this matter. According to the China Daily newspaper, it is naive to believe that China will swallow the bitter pill of humiliation.

On July 5, China's English-language publication The Global Times published an article that said that Washington's interference in territorial disputes in the South China Sea could lead to a military confrontation. The article admits the inability of the Chinese army to resist the military power of the United States. However, the Chinese are ready to make the Americans "pay a very high price" if they try to influence the outcome of the dispute over the islands.
(http://www.pravdareport.com/news/world/asia/05-07-2016/134929-china_usa_war-0/)

Recommendations
  • U.S. and Chinese political leaders alike should have military options other than immediate strikes to destroy opposing forces.
  • U.S. leaders should have the means to confer with Chinese leaders and contain a conflict before it gets out of hand.
  • The United States should guard against automaticity in implementing immediate attacks on Chinese A2AD and have plans and means to prevent hostilities from becoming severe. Establishing "fail safe" arrangements will guarantee definitive, informed political approval for military operations.
  • The United States should reduce the effect of Chinese A2AD by investing in more-survivable force platforms (e.g., submarines) and in counter-A2AD (e.g., theater missiles).
  • The United States should conduct contingency planning with key allies, especially Japan.
  • The United States should ensure that the Chinese are specifically aware of the potential for catastrophic results even if a war is not lost militarily.
  • The United States should improve its ability to sustain intense military operations.
  • U.S. leaders should develop options to deny China access to war-critical commodities and technologies in the event of war.
  • The United States should undertake measures to mitigate the interruption of critical products from China.
  • Additionally, the U.S. Army should invest in land-based A2AD capabilities, encourage and enable East Asian partners to mount strong defense, improve interoperability with partners (especially Japan), and contribute to the expansion and deepening of Sino-U.S. military-to-military understanding and cooperation to reduce dangers of misperception and miscalculation.
(http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1140.html)

(http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-09/heres-how-us-china-war-could-play-out)
 
B

bundee1

Well-Known Member
Mutually assured poverty will keep things in check. Death by nuke is quick. Watching your children die of hunger takes time.
 
Rizlared

Rizlared

Well-Known Member
vostok said:

China has launched naval exercises in the area of the Paracel Islands on July 5. China is expected to fight for the affiliation of the islands at the Court of Arbitration in the Hague.

The adequate lawsuit was filed by the Philippine government in 2015. Vietnam, Brunei, Malaysia and Taiwan also have their claims for the disputed islands. China believes that the case of the disputed islands was initiated with the support of the United States. China refuses to recognize the jurisdiction of The Hague in this matter. According to the China Daily newspaper, it is naive to believe that China will swallow the bitter pill of humiliation.

On July 5, China's English-language publication The Global Times published an article that said that Washington's interference in territorial disputes in the South China Sea could lead to a military confrontation. The article admits the inability of the Chinese army to resist the military power of the United States. However, the Chinese are ready to make the Americans "pay a very high price" if they try to influence the outcome of the dispute over the islands.
(http://www.pravdareport.com/news/world/asia/05-07-2016/134929-china_usa_war-0/)

Recommendations
  • U.S. and Chinese political leaders alike should have military options other than immediate strikes to destroy opposing forces.
  • U.S. leaders should have the means to confer with Chinese leaders and contain a conflict before it gets out of hand.
  • The United States should guard against automaticity in implementing immediate attacks on Chinese A2AD and have plans and means to prevent hostilities from becoming severe. Establishing "fail safe" arrangements will guarantee definitive, informed political approval for military operations.
  • The United States should reduce the effect of Chinese A2AD by investing in more-survivable force platforms (e.g., submarines) and in counter-A2AD (e.g., theater missiles).
  • The United States should conduct contingency planning with key allies, especially Japan.
  • The United States should ensure that the Chinese are specifically aware of the potential for catastrophic results even if a war is not lost militarily.
  • The United States should improve its ability to sustain intense military operations.
  • U.S. leaders should develop options to deny China access to war-critical commodities and technologies in the event of war.
  • The United States should undertake measures to mitigate the interruption of critical products from China.
  • Additionally, the U.S. Army should invest in land-based A2AD capabilities, encourage and enable East Asian partners to mount strong defense, improve interoperability with partners (especially Japan), and contribute to the expansion and deepening of Sino-U.S. military-to-military understanding and cooperation to reduce dangers of misperception and miscalculation.
(http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1140.html)

(http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-09/heres-how-us-china-war-could-play-out)
Click to expand...
Enlightening thread, ty
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Based on a national average, Chinese have a higher i.q. than Americans.

However, some studies reveal the average American male has a longer penis than the average Chinese.

There are of course exceptions to this rule, for instance many Americans have a low i.q and possess a tiny penis.
 
see4

see4

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Based on a national average, Chinese have a higher i.q. than Americans.

However, some studies reveal the average American male has a longer penis than the average Chinese.

There are of course exceptions to this rule, for instance many Americans have a low i.q and possess a tiny penis.
Click to expand...
My IQ is very high and my penis is very tiny. But I'm not Asian.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Based on a national average, Chinese have a higher i.q. than Americans.

However, some studies reveal the average American male has a longer penis than the average Chinese.

There are of course exceptions to this rule, for instance many Americans have a low i.q and possess a tiny penis.
Click to expand...
nice job citing the "work" of known white supremacist and nazi eugenicist phillipe rushton.
 
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
nonconformist said:
shit like this has made me completely divest myself from the economic system in the US. there isn't shit that will effect me in a complete economic crash, currency fluctuations or collapse, or anything else that might effect the US.
Click to expand...
Cool, will you trade a ham sandwich for this mercury dime?
 
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
vostok said:

China has launched naval exercises in the area of the Paracel Islands on July 5. China is expected to fight for the affiliation of the islands at the Court of Arbitration in the Hague.

The adequate lawsuit was filed by the Philippine government in 2015. Vietnam, Brunei, Malaysia and Taiwan also have their claims for the disputed islands. China believes that the case of the disputed islands was initiated with the support of the United States. China refuses to recognize the jurisdiction of The Hague in this matter. According to the China Daily newspaper, it is naive to believe that China will swallow the bitter pill of humiliation.

On July 5, China's English-language publication The Global Times published an article that said that Washington's interference in territorial disputes in the South China Sea could lead to a military confrontation. The article admits the inability of the Chinese army to resist the military power of the United States. However, the Chinese are ready to make the Americans "pay a very high price" if they try to influence the outcome of the dispute over the islands.
(http://www.pravdareport.com/news/world/asia/05-07-2016/134929-china_usa_war-0/)

Recommendations
  • U.S. and Chinese political leaders alike should have military options other than immediate strikes to destroy opposing forces.
  • U.S. leaders should have the means to confer with Chinese leaders and contain a conflict before it gets out of hand.
  • The United States should guard against automaticity in implementing immediate attacks on Chinese A2AD and have plans and means to prevent hostilities from becoming severe. Establishing "fail safe" arrangements will guarantee definitive, informed political approval for military operations.
  • The United States should reduce the effect of Chinese A2AD by investing in more-survivable force platforms (e.g., submarines) and in counter-A2AD (e.g., theater missiles).
  • The United States should conduct contingency planning with key allies, especially Japan.
  • The United States should ensure that the Chinese are specifically aware of the potential for catastrophic results even if a war is not lost militarily.
  • The United States should improve its ability to sustain intense military operations.
  • U.S. leaders should develop options to deny China access to war-critical commodities and technologies in the event of war.
  • The United States should undertake measures to mitigate the interruption of critical products from China.
  • Additionally, the U.S. Army should invest in land-based A2AD capabilities, encourage and enable East Asian partners to mount strong defense, improve interoperability with partners (especially Japan), and contribute to the expansion and deepening of Sino-U.S. military-to-military understanding and cooperation to reduce dangers of misperception and miscalculation.
(http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1140.html)

(http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-09/heres-how-us-china-war-could-play-out)
Click to expand...
This very high price you talk about... TRUMP! will haggle them down. He is a good haggler.
 
M

mynameisnobody

Well-Known Member
see4 said:
I'm sure Trump will simply build a wall around the Pacific ocean, and make China pay for it.
Click to expand...
Your the first demorat here to admit trump is going to win. You may not be as dumb as I thought. I bet your going to vote for him also. Don't tell anyone else or your buds will rag you out. It would be best if you acted as if you really did not like him. You know stupid your buds are so deny deny deny as you would any other truth.
 
Vnsmkr

Vnsmkr

Well-Known Member
What in the fuck did I just use my time to read? Nevermind wrong fucking section, or whatever this is over here
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top