Is that one of the f2's?Is there such a thing as "too pregnant"? In real life we know there is no grey area to question yes/no, there is not kinda pregnant, but anything more than triplets is too pregnant.
View attachment 4318066 View attachment 4318067
This is your f2 pregnant by an original cnc F1 male.Is that one of the f2's?
Very nice man, on all of them. I don't know why I still ask, I can spot cnc's leafs pretty quick anymore.This is your f2 pregnant by an original cnc F1 male.
View attachment 4318248
An Oregon Huckelberry x cnc
View attachment 4318249
Lucinda Williams x cnc
View attachment 4318250
Graveyard Whistler no.2 x cnc
View attachment 4318252
@BigHornBuds (C99P x HH) x cnc
View attachment 4318254
Looks like someone in the trio is making sure their progeny are marked and is coming thru strong.Somewhat similiar structures,definitely identical frost coverage. Who'd you say dominates the trio by appearance alone. Then nose? What did the Malawai ad here?Malawi x Golden Glue x Dogtrap
View attachment 4318022 View attachment 4318023
Jelly Pie x Golden Glue x Dogtrap
View attachment 4318025 View attachment 4318026
LubDa, you kill it with these meltdowns. Every pic I see =flame retardant suit required.Nice work.Meltdowns 1,2,and 3. Probably a couple weeks until the chop.View attachment 4318373View attachment 4318374
View attachment 4318376
Trying to learn something here, Is this a backcross? F2 back to F1? Well now that I type it out,I suppose not.The F2's didn't come from the"original male" and a female pairing.This is your f2 pregnant by an original cnc F1 male.
View attachment 4318248
Thanks Cob, im looking forward to your review.Looks like someone in the trio is making sure their progeny are marked and is coming thru strong.Somewhat similiar structures,definitely identical frost coverage. Who'd you say dominates the trio by appearance alone. Then nose? What did the Malawai ad here?
Nicely Done @Bakersfield
Whatcha got going?Somewhere in there is a couple of keeper males for this summer’s outdoor chucking. View attachment 4318397
Glad you asked because I am wondering myself?Trying to learn something here, Is this a backcross? F2 back to F1? Well now that I type it out,I suppose not.The F2's didn't come from the"original male" and a female pairing.
So,what would this cross be labeled? F2 +F1= F3? But in this case somethings different. Chucker's Chime in...."teach me Seymore!"
That CNC male has been studded out.Well done SSGrower.
Trying to learn something here, Is this a backcross? F2 back to F1? Well now that I type it out,I suppose not.The F2's didn't come from the"original male" and a female pairing.
So,what would this cross be labeled? F2 +F1= F3? But in this case somethings different. Chucker's Chime in...."teach me Seymore!"
That CNC male has been studded out.Well done SSGrower.
I think it could be similar to what is done when working toward a ibl. I'm really not sure what term would define that. I'm trying to figure out right now if hitting cnc with purple stardawg pollen was a good idea. Something keeps telling me it should be a few generations out from F1. Like taking the line away from stardawg, before bringing it back in. But the beans should tell me if I did something I shouldn't have.Glad you asked because I am wondering myself?
Given the "original" cnc was not a worked line I fell like it goes back to F1, if it were worked and I knew the phenotyping is there any a legitimate way to call that a backcross? Or would that be F3 same as if all seeds shared the same F1 progeny?
Any names you want to toss around? I'm at a loss for words & you are the first to experience her.Chop day for the "Early Girl" Cojack x Honeybee f3. Day 94, so 93 days of 12/12, 5 - 10 percent amber. This would be the low end of harvest time, keep in mind I am using a red initiator both am and pm and I probably harvest on what many consider the early side.
View attachment 4317512 View attachment 4317513 View attachment 4317514
The next in line is 2-3 weeks out yet.
View attachment 4317515
Gonna push the party cup as long as I can, she is not going amber as much as I would expect based on pistil and leaf color, but she has been abused. Pushing the time to see if the rootbound abused girl will throw a nanner or two, so far nothing to warrant my earlier intersex suspicion (dark green/purple/or black spikey growth on preflowers).
View attachment 4317517