Circumcision

cannabineer said:
I otoh consider it a mutilation . Turtleneck and proud of it. cn
Click to expand...

Yo canna, they say getting cut (as I am) reduces sensitivity, what's your take on that having not been cut? I've never gotten off with a chick, been with 3 different ones, and have read extensively on circumcision and the way the penis is naturally supposed to emit pleasure. They say friction is abnormal to getting off, (unfortunately, because most American's are circumcised) and (not sure of the word) but having a foreskin is much more normal (and pleasurable), how is it having a foreskin? Could you describe it to a person without one? I don't blame my condition on that, just interested..
 
Circumcision = healthier than not. No offense to anyone who isn't, this is just the truth. Any doctor who is for some stupid ass reason against it will use a bunch of weasel words to make it seem bad. In reality no being circumcised can lead to problems like a Phimosis as well as other problems. People like to IGNORANTLY compare male circumcision to that of females. THIS IS NOT THE SAME THING, and you are either determined to be ignorant or stupid about the subject. Male = cut off foreskin, which helps to avoid the problems I talked about a second ago. Female = cutting off the entire clitoris in order to gain more control over the woman because she will not try to cheat on you with another man because she cannot receive pleasure in the first place.
 
Padawanbater2 said:
Yo canna, they say getting cut (as I am) reduces sensitivity, what's your take on that having not been cut? I've never gotten off with a chick, been with 3 different ones, and have read extensively on circumcision and the way the penis is naturally supposed to emit pleasure. They say friction is abnormal to getting off, (unfortunately, because most American's are circumcised) and (not sure of the word) but having a foreskin is much more normal (and pleasurable), how is it having a foreskin? Could you describe it to a person without one? I don't blame my condition on that, just interested..
Click to expand...

Getting cut does not reduce sensitivity. This is a myth perpetuated by certain people. Even if it did, it would just make it take longer for you to cum, and I don't know anyone who complains about being able to last longer in the sack. If I were able to cum harder than I do currently I think my dick and head would simultaneously explode.
 
Cut= cuter
Uncut= ugly one eyed monster

That's what it boils down to for me that's probably how most women look at it too
 
I'm uncut, my lady prefers it. Never had a problem keeping clean.. I mean wash your fucking dick people, it's not difficult.
The skin pulls back when you get hard anyway and you look normal.
It hurts like a mother fucker when my unsheathed head touches say the inside of my pants though..I don't understand how cut dudes can tolerate that especially in jeans and free balling..there's gotta be some sensitivity loss there if it doesn't hurt at all.
 
this thread


rayj_9_gif2.gif
 
Padawanbater2 said:
Yo canna, they say getting cut (as I am) reduces sensitivity, what's your take on that having not been cut? I've never gotten off with a chick, been with 3 different ones, and have read extensively on circumcision and the way the penis is naturally supposed to emit pleasure. They say friction is abnormal to getting off, (unfortunately, because most American's are circumcised) and (not sure of the word) but having a foreskin is much more normal (and pleasurable), how is it having a foreskin? Could you describe it to a person without one? I don't blame my condition on that, just interested..
Click to expand...

Pad, since I've never been circumcised i can't provide a comparison. Anything I say will be very subjective. Also keep in mind that I seem to be more sensitive (not in a good way) than most guys. I tore it on my first night of sex, and I've routinely torn it when trying to enter a pussy that wasn't properly wet, be it from proper foreplay or a bit of more task-oriented oral prep.
But back on point ... what i did discover, early and often, is that it influenced how I masturbate. Unlike cut guys who have no choice, I never touched the head proper ... but rolled the foreskin back&forth until result. I never needed lotion, tho' I did experiment with the pros and cons of petroleum jelly.

DuplicatePie said:
Circumcision = healthier than not. No offense to anyone who isn't, this is just the truth. Any doctor who is for some stupid ass reason against it will use a bunch of weasel words to make it seem bad. In reality no being circumcised can lead to problems like a Phimosis as well as other problems. People like to IGNORANTLY compare male circumcision to that of females. THIS IS NOT THE SAME THING, and you are either determined to be ignorant or stupid about the subject. Male = cut off foreskin, which helps to avoid the problems I talked about a second ago. Female = cutting off the entire clitoris in order to gain more control over the woman because she will not try to cheat on you with another man because she cannot receive pleasure in the first place.
Click to expand...

talk about poisoning the well! You set it up so that a dissenting opinion is automatically ignorant (in caps), stupid-ass, weasely and just plain wrong. However the medical literature is replete with tradition andor a personal crusade dressed up as sound practice. I, for one, am unconvinced. If no foreskin conferred a definite advantage, it would have become even more vestigial. cn
 
tldr

why the fuck would anyone cut the end off of the end of their child's dick, lessening their pleasure?
so it can look better?
how many times do you see a guy walking around with his dick hanging out and think, "that's is a good looking cock."

the latest study says "it is worth the risk"
that was obviously done by women

the few health benefits are not worth the risks and the loss of sensation

In my opinion, it is stupid to circumcise a child
why not let them decide when they are 18 instead of mutilating a baby?
 
I'm cut and wish I wasn't. It's my body, nobody else had the right to mutilate it.

Studies finding it to be beneficial or at least harmless are no different from studies finding that weed is harmful - both are bogus and paid for by wealthy, powerful and utterly corrupt lobby groups. The only difference is, as rich and powerful as Big Brew is, religion is even richer and more powerful.

I'm just thankful that religion is dying so rapidly in the western world. But man, sometimes I wish it was happening faster.

Edit: Not to sound harsh. I don't knock religious people, I see them as liking a band I'm not a fan of. They're people just like anyone else and have my respect as an individual regardless of any groups that they belong to. It's just organized religion that I have an issue with.
 
Fuck if it wasn't meant to be there, we wouldn't have fucking evolved and grown a foreskin to cover our dicks in the first place. PROTECT YOUR DICK...with foreskin.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

hanimmal
AP: Fraud claims aimed in part at keeping Trump base loyal.
17 18 19
Replies
371
Views
21K
hanimmal
hanimmal
G
Cannabis users will drive into murky territory when they get behind the wheel
2 3
Replies
40
Views
2K
GrowRock
GrowRock
G
Opinion: Canadian Medical Association shouldn't give cannabis cold shoulder
Replies
9
Views
904
VIANARCHRIS
VIANARCHRIS
G
The Marijuana Charade Is Over: It's Time To Start Selling Weed To Broke Stoners Again
Replies
8
Views
583
The Hippy
The Hippy
vostok
A Friendly Reminder: Impeaching Donald Trump Will Not Remove Him From Office
Replies
2
Views
249
vostok
vostok
Back
Top