City of Oakland and Feds Go Toe-to-Toe in Medical Marijuana Dispensary Forfeiture Cas

squarepush3r

Well-Known Member
http://americansforsafeaccess.org/city-of-oakland-and-feds-go-toe-to-toe-in-medical-marijuana-dispensary-forfeiture-case

City of Oakland and Feds Go Toe-to-Toe in Medical Marijuana Dispensary Forfeiture Case

Hearing at 10am Thursday may decide whether Oakland's challenge to federal authority can proceed


San Francisco, CA -- The Obama Administration will be going toe-to-toe in federal court Thursday at 10am with the City of Oakland and California's largest medical marijuana dispensary, Harborside Health Center. U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag filed forfeiture proceedings in July against Harborside's landlords to force the dispensary to close its two locations in Oakland and San Jose. Then, in October, the City of Oakland filed its own legal action against Haag and her boss, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder. Harborside serves thousands of patients, pays local, state and federal taxes, and has been legally operating in Oakland since 2006.

In an unprecedented move by a municipal government, the City of Oakland has legally challenged the Obama Administration's attack on medical marijuana. In its most recent brief filed last week, the city argues the federal government "exceeded its authority" by trying to shut down Harborside, "thereby jeopardizing the public welfare of Oakland and its residents." The brief further states that shuttering Harborside will not only "injure patients by denying them the medical benefits of cannabis," but it will also "cause economic harm from lost tax revenue, and increased costs of police enforcement, in addition to untold costs associated with channeling thousands of patients into an unregulated [illicit] market."

During Thursday's hearing at San Francisco's federal courthouse, Chief Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James will address two motions for preliminary injunction filed by both of Harborside's landlords in an effort to evict the dispensary and avoid seizure of their property by the federal government. The hearing will also address the related case filed by the City of Oakland, which the city says should be heard before the Justice Department is allowed to proceed with its forfeiture action against Harborside.

"The federal government has picked the wrong fight here," said Joe Elford, Chief Counsel with Americans for Safe Access (ASA), the country's leading medical marijuana advocacy group. "By so blatantly threatening access to medical marijuana for thousands of patients, the Obama Administration has drawn even greater attention to its misguided strategy on this issue." ASA is representing a group of patients and their particular interests in this forfeiture proceeding. Harborside, which is defending its own interests in avoiding closure, is being represented by Henry Wykowski.

Thursday's hearing comes less than a month after a state court rejected a similar attempt by one of Harborside's landlords, Real Property and Improvements (RPI), to evict the longstanding dispensary. RPI alleged in this separate lawsuit filed in August that the dispensary violated its lease by conducting illegal activity, which constituted a nuisance. However, Alameda County Superior Court Judge Evelio Grillo ruled on November 30th that state court could not deem Harborside or any other dispensary a "nuisance" based on a violation of federal law.

The federal forfeiture action against Harborside is one of a handful of similar lawsuits the Obama Justice Department has filed in recent months. However, since October 2011, when all four U.S. Attorneys in California announced a campaign to shut down medical marijuana dispensaries, letters were sent to hundreds of landlords threatening asset forfeiture and criminal prosecution if they continued to lease to their dispensary tenants. Although they have filed fewer than 20 such lawsuits, the specter of litigation has caused the unnecessary closure of at least 500 legally-compliant dispensaries across the state.
 

tibberous

Well-Known Member
cause economic harm from lost tax revenue, and increased costs of police enforcement, in addition to untold costs associated with channeling thousands of patients into an unregulated [illicit] market.
I used to wonder if I'd ever see weed legal - now I wonder if I'll still be young enough to want to do coke when they legalize it.
 

aknight3

Moderator
I used to wonder if I'd ever see weed legal - now I wonder if I'll still be young enough to want to do coke when they legalize it.
i really dont think cocaine will ever be legal for non medical use, it is a schedule 2 though, currently medically legal, as cannabis should be.
 

curious2garden

Well-Known Mod
Staff member
i really dont think cocaine will ever be legal for non medical use, it is a schedule 2 though, currently medically legal, as cannabis should be.
Interestingly they are talking about Schedule III for full plant Cannabis when they re-schedule (they are planning on it you know), they are just waiting for big pharma to get their Sativex (or alternative) ready for release. Oh and currently Marinol/Dronabinol is Schedule III so that would be consistent.
 

aknight3

Moderator
that would be great, if it was sched 3. it honestly shouldnt be scheduled at all, its not even close to alcohol and thats not scheduled so why should cannabis ya know?
 

NoGutsGrower

Well-Known Member
Interestingly they are talking about Schedule III for full plant Cannabis when they re-schedule (they are planning on it you know), they are just waiting for big pharma to get their Sativex (or alternative) ready for release. Oh and currently Marinol/Dronabinol is Schedule III so that would be consistent.
Marinol is Schedule III and doesn't do shit. It is only fake thc, no other cannabanoids, no high effect. I was taking dronabinol before I started smoking weed. I quit taking them shortly after I started the real thing. I'm not going to lie, I'm kinda looking forward to Sativex type products. I'm thinking it will be like marinol, I will be one of the few that can get it But unlike marinol it might actually work or be a good addition to my homegrown (I will always have some nice home grown)!
 

curious2garden

Well-Known Mod
Staff member
that would be great, if it was sched 3. it honestly shouldnt be scheduled at all, its not even close to alcohol and thats not scheduled so why should cannabis ya know?
Yes and back in the 70's when the Controlled Substances Act was first created, there wasn't enough information on the effects of Cannabis. Mostly the physicians were against the inclusion, of cannabis, in the schedule at all. There simply wasn't enough information at the time. So the Shafer commission was created and for 2 years they were to take a look at this question. During this 2 year time Cannabis was to be Schedule 1 but then re-scheduled when the science came.

The science came in and the politicians ignored it (as they had intended to all along). Anyway here's the Shafer Commission's report:
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/library/studies/nc/ncmenu.htm
 
Top