Cory and trevor
Well-Known Member
(2) for each registered qualifying patient who has specified that the primary caregiver will be allowed under state law to cultivate marihuana for the 12 marihuana plants kept in an enclosed, locked facility; and
Cory and trevor..there is the section of the law as written...where does it say the plants now belong to the care giver?
Because I read law: to cultivate marihuana for the qualifying patient, and that doesn't say to cultivate his new found plants and supply the patient.
So, If I boarded my horses with you, they are no longer mine? Or they are mine, but when I'm not enjoying them, you can rent them out to plow fields?
With all due respect, you may want to work with those kids on interpreting what they read.
Gosh Bob, did you bring plants to your caregiver to "board"? was it seeds? Cuttings maybe? This is not the case as I interpreted your statements about "your" plants. With all due respect, I've read the law and I still believe its rights not plants. Horses you own and exist and are already born are quiet different then plants that are only ideas and thoughts not flesh and roots yet. I get your comparison but I think a caregiver would be more like a breeder and not a boarder. At any rate, you're very inteligent so I suspect you are just using that flawed comparison to argue with me. Your card differs from a caregiver when you give up plant rights in the way the gentleman below states-you aren't allowed to hold plants, your caregiver is. if ths situation is not OK with you then you shouldn't have signed the caregver on. You can't posess plants. Posess here, there or anywhere it is also very clear in the law that you cannot posess plants. very simply. The law does not cover any disclosure of cost, profit or plant count to a patient. if that needs to be changed let's change it. I feel it needs to be broadened to include everyone over 18 years of age anyway.