You try hard, but you just got no game.
No. I don't defend racist practices that cause an actionable harm. Nor am I fond of racist thoughts or beliefs. I think they are a waste of time and silly.
I do know the difference between actionable harm and indifference though, you apparently do not. When you respond to both the same way, you are showing a blatant disregard for a persons right to control themself and their OWN property. That makes you a person that wants to make people do what you would do, even when their actions or lack of have not caused an actionable harm. In other words you are defending initiating aggression against people that have not aggressed.
Everyone does not know that a thought or an inaction can cause harm, despite your claim. The reason is it is not demonstrably true.
If that were true your inaction to attending to "world hunger" has caused the deaths of millions of children. Your inaction/indifference to ending war has caused death and destruction.
When you drive by a person with a flat tire on the highway, have YOU made them late for work?
No you haven't. When you poke a hole in their tire you have. That is aggression. When you refuse to aid a person you have not committed aggression, you are showing indifference. There is a huge difference, isn't there?
When a racist or other silly person, like yourself, believe there is no difference between a thought and an act I have concerns.
Lumping two kinds of circumstances together and using that as the basis of your argument, as if they were the same, makes you seem, well rather dull.
You are the person defending acts of aggression, I am not.
You think it is okay to initiate force against somebody that has not initiated force. That puts you on the level as the fuckheads that wear white sheets. Unkkkle Buckkk....has a nice ring to it.