Closing threads

Status
Not open for further replies.

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
You actually claimed you thought the stimulus wasn't big enough. Are you willing to go on record here that you didn't?

It was when I asked how an anarchist could possibly be in favor of government stimulus that you morphed into your rant against austerity (which is still ironic for an anarchist) and started posting pictures that had nothing to do with the argument. It was like you were trying to channel great minds to help you out of your corner. I remember this like it was yesterday, that was when I made up my mind not to waste any more time with you. I should have listened to myself.
You're like an 8 year old demanding I swear on my mother's grave. You don't even see the distortion you're now making to you're own distortion. It's like we went from what I said, to I wanted a bigger stimulus to I thought the stimulus wasn't big enough. You gotta be careful when you argue with two different people at the same time because you are smoking weed and confusing what I said with what UB said.

In a different argument, I once said that in order for the stimulus to have worked, it should have gone to the people instead of the banks. That is sticking in your little mind and making you stubbornly hear what you want to hear.

The other problem is your disdain for my views. It makes you think I'm stupid and it makes you write in a way that is kind of condescending. So I return fire very bluntly, since I'm not stupid and don't like being treated like I'm stupid.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You're like an 8 year old demanding I swear on my mother's grave. You don't even see the distortion you're now making to you're own distortion. It's like we went from what I said, to I wanted a bigger stimulus to I thought the stimulus wasn't big enough. You gotta be careful when you argue with two different people at the same time because you are smoking weed and confusing what I said with what UB said.

In a different argument, I once said that in order for the stimulus to have worked, it should have gone to the people instead of the banks. That is sticking in your little mind and making you stubbornly hear what you want to hear.

The other problem is your disdain for my views. It makes you think I'm stupid and it makes you write in a way that is kind of condescending. So I return fire very bluntly, since I'm not stupid and don't like being treated like I'm stupid.
i'll gladly say the stimulus wasn't big enough.

and abandon, just ignore when ginwilly tries to put words in your mouth.

if i state the mundane fact that blacks in this nation have been set back by centuries of persecution, he accuses me of saying that all blacks are dumb and need special help because they are black.

he seems to confuse his own thoughts for those of others very often.
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
The other problem is your disdain for my views. It makes you think I'm stupid and it makes you write in a way that is kind of condescending. So I return fire very bluntly, since I'm not stupid and don't like being treated like I'm stupid.
I honestly don't think your stupid, but I do think you are confused. Guilty as charged for being condescending to your little hard head. Apologies for that.

Dude, the entire involvement I had with you was based on your assertion of the stimulus being too small while being an anarchist. It was the epitome of irony to me and I pointed it out. That's when you started posting pictures and pissing and moaning about austerity.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
I honestly don't think your stupid, but I do think you are confused. Guilty as charged for being condescending to your little hard head. Apologies for that.

Dude, the entire involvement I had with you was based on your assertion of the stimulus being too small while being an anarchist. It was the epitome of irony to me and I pointed it out. That's when you started posting pictures and pissing and moaning about austerity.
No, actually, you distorted what I said and went on a bull shit rant about something I DIDN'T FUCKING SAY.
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
i'll gladly say the stimulus wasn't big enough.

and abandon, just ignore when ginwilly tries to put words in your mouth.

if i state the mundane fact that blacks in this nation have been set back by centuries of persecution, he accuses me of saying that all blacks are dumb and need special help because they are black.

he seems to confuse his own thoughts for those of others very often.
link? I remember saying that you think blacks need assistance that no other heritage needs, because that's what you said when you supported that racist after school program. Of course you have your but whys, still doesn't change what you said.

sorry man, you can't get away from that one, but feel free to call everyone else a racist.
 

GOD HERE

Well-Known Member
Also to AC.

How do you rectify calling for no government, yet feel when government cuts spending it's collective misery? You are getting your professors lectures confused.
Ironically you're clearly the one who doesn't understand what he's talking about.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
several.

how many threads were we seeing close before the arrival of the...
?
Is this a rhetorical trick, like when someone said being racist isn't being a bigot?
well, ya gotta look at it from a historical perspective.

ya see, the nazis had a lot in common with the greeks and the romans, to them it was totally OK to fuck little boys.

i submit to evidence exhibit A: http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/pwh/steakley-nazis.asp

ya see, the nazis being gay was OK as long as you were a masculine gay. they holocausted the effeminate gays though.

so really, it's a tricky question. to them, fucking little boys wasn't pedophilia and fucking your commanding officer wasn't gay, but if you fucked some effeminate gay, then you were in trouble.

it's hard to comprehend exactly how they justified all this to themselves.

that has been today's history lesson in gay pedo nazis.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
well, ya gotta look at it from a historical perspective.

ya see, the nazis had a lot in common with the greeks and the romans, to them it was totally OK to fuck little boys.

i submit to evidence exhibit A: http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/pwh/steakley-nazis.asp

ya see, the nazis being gay was OK as long as you were a masculine gay. they holocausted the effeminate gays though.

so really, it's a tricky question. to them, fucking little boys wasn't pedophilia and fucking your commanding officer wasn't gay, but if you fucked some effeminate gay, then you were in trouble.

it's hard to comprehend exactly how they justified all this to themselves.

that has been today's history lesson in gay pedo nazis.
Sounds more queer than homosexual.
 

SHOTGUN420

Active Member
that has been today's history lesson in gay pedo nazis.
On the one hand you see buck stands against gay pedo nazis but when shown proof of gay pedo rabbis on the other it's not allowed to be discussed.

Seems like you support scumbag pedophiles but only if they are jewish. Way to stand up for children around the world. :clap:
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
Ironically you're clearly the one who doesn't understand what he's talking about.
Explain it then? Why is decreased government to the point of none = good in the anarchist world, but decreased government spending of any kind is collective misery in the anarchist world.

Understand for the sake of argument that an anarchist believes in self rule and no government.

Realize please where a government gets the money they are spending that less of = collective misery
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
On the one hand you see buck stands against gay pedo nazis but when shown proof of gay pedo rabbis on the other it's not allowed to be discussed.

Seems like you support scumbag pedophiles but only if they are jewish. Way to stand up for children around the world. :clap:
metzitzah is not pedophilia anymore than your mom wiping your ass and vagina when she changes your diaper is pedophilia. it is a centuries forgotten medical procedure that has been abandoned even by the overwhelming majority of batshit insane orthodox jews.

but do go on riding the fail train, it's all you have left.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Explain it then? Why is decreased government to the point of none = good in the anarchist world, but decreased government spending of any kind is collective misery in the anarchist world.

Understand for the sake of argument that an anarchist believes in self rule and no government.

Realize please where a government gets the money they are spending that less of = collective misery
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
sigh...

so you don't know how to rectify those two thoughts either AC? You can definitely tell they came from 2 different profs. I guess it's picture time!!!
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
sigh...

so you don't know how to rectify those two thoughts either AC? You can definitely tell they came from 2 different profs. I guess it's picture time!!!
No, I'm just calling you a statist idiot.

When you repeatedly demonstrate stupidity, it can't be considered rude to call you an idiot. I will state the concept once again, since you fail to see how a "free-market" as you call it, is entirely dependent upon gov't. The state exists to protect private property. Try and connect the dots and keep up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top