Club 600

GemuGrows

GemuGrows

Well-Known Member
On the IC mag forum theres a few huge threads dedicated to Maxigrow/Maxibloom nutes from GH.

It makes me sad to see the level of quality they are getting with literally only using 2 of the cheepest nutrients on market.

I want growing to be harder than using 7g of a powder....but is it?

https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=191645

This, combined with knowing that the best concentrate makers in the world are distilling cannabanoids made from co2 extraction into the pure substances, and re adding what they want back in, makes me wonder what is the point of adding a bunch of shit to your grow?

The results some of these maxi growers are getting from dirt cheep cents per gallon nutes+ cal mag are insane...

WTF is the point of what were trying so hard to do!?!? I want this to be harder.

Maybe its at the point where growing is 110% an art and not a science.


Personally I don't smoke, but I spend like $300-500 on nutes per grow. I could cut that all down to like $15 per grow and maybe have a higher yield. Like WTF? I want this shit to be harder than it is, but is it really that cheap and easy to get the same results? To make more bank? wtf?


The nutrients fall perfectly in line with Johe Cervantes's KISS (keep it simple, stoner) method of growing.


If I tried Maxibloom/Maxigrow, would anybody test them with me? My curiosity is beyond peakead
 
Last edited:
jigfresh

jigfresh

Well-Known Member
I think it costs me roughly $1 per plant in nutrients, for the entire grow, from seedling to harvest. And I have 6 foot plants. :)

If you would like something more difficult, I suggest picking up a new hobby to go along with growing... because there really isn't all that much to growing a plant that could survive on it's own in most circumstances.... at least in my eyes.
 
DST

DST

Well-Known Member
@GemuGrows fake tits look great, but real ones are better!!!!!!:) that's the simplest way I can think of putting it.

EDIT: And like Jig said, if you break it down, most ways are cheap. I just bought a box of Bloodmeal and Magnesium for 19euro (a no MJ related companies product), and thats going to last me for who knows how longs.......since I only use 15g per 1m squared of soil.
You can always get nutes that have pictures of Tigers and other Gods of the World and pay more I guess, but the plants generally don't know.:)
 
GemuGrows

GemuGrows

Well-Known Member
DST said:
@GemuGrows fake tits look great, but real ones are better!!!!!!:) that's the simplest way I can think of putting it.

EDIT: And like Jig said, if you break it down, most ways are cheap. I just bought a box of Bloodmeal and Magnesium for 19euro (a no MJ related companies product), and thats going to last me for who knows how longs.......since I only use 15g per 1m squared of soil.
You can always get nutes that have pictures of Tigers and other Gods of the World and pay more I guess, but the plants generally don't know.:)
Click to expand...
Thank god.

Gotta say, I don't think ive seen fake tits that look better than real tits.

I appreciate the opinion :D

jigfresh said:
I think it costs me roughly $1 per plant in nutrients, for the entire grow, from seedling to harvest. And I have 6 foot plants. :)

If you would like something more difficult, I suggest picking up a new hobby to go along with growing... because there really isn't all that much to growing a plant that could survive on it's own in most circumstances.... at least in my eyes.
Click to expand...
I wasnt saying as much that growing weed is difficult, but I feed my plants 25+ things. If feeding them only 1 thing would get the same result, then I was concerned with wasting time/money haha.

I'm an organic grower, and with my hydroponic I use a lot of compost teas and microbes. If all that could be eliminated and replicated for a fraction of the cost and effort I would personally be disappointed, I put a lot of pride in the quality of my product; as do many friends. If that quality could be replicated by 1/4assing it and spending 1/10th on nutes (if not less), then fuck that hah.

I don't want it to be quite that easy
 
ArcticOrange

ArcticOrange

Well-Known Member
GemuGrows said:
Thank god.

Gotta say, I don't think ive seen fake tits that look better than real tits.

I appreciate the opinion :D



I wasnt saying as much that growing weed is difficult, but I feed my plants 25+ things. If feeding them only 1 thing would get the same result, then I was concerned with wasting time/money haha.

I'm an organic grower, and with my hydroponic I use a lot of compost teas and microbes. If all that could be eliminated and replicated for a fraction of the cost and effort I would personally be disappointed, I put a lot of pride in the quality of my product; as do many friends. If that quality could be replicated by 1/4assing it and spending 1/10th on nutes (if not less), then fuck that hah.

I don't want it to be quite that easy
Click to expand...
I dont bother with nutes in soil, found it easier and cheaper to just roll organic. If those 2 part gh threads make you mad go check out homebrewers dynagro set ups. Cheap.

Oh and all the GH guys are just supporting Scotts
 
DST

DST

Well-Known Member
I've never had the pleasure of groping a pair, but my mate who is one of the Great Square Mile workers in London frequented loads of the fine establishments and companies that offer you the chance of groping a set. And he said he was always disapointed when he got a rock hard set of silicon....I trust his opinion, albeit not always his financial one since he was one of the great Lehman employees, lmfao.
 
jigfresh

jigfresh

Well-Known Member
Ah, so like you want to feel as though YOU have contributed something? Like you grew those beautiful buds with the techniques you used and came up with. I've found the trick is to get out of the way. Let it do it's natural thing, and the plant will reward you. Like with most things in life... we matter so much less then we think and hope we do. At least in my eyes.

I would say you are wasting your time/ money. Sorry. :(
 
Figgy

Figgy

Well-Known Member
GemuGrows said:
On the IC mag forum theres a few huge threads dedicated to Maxigrow/Maxibloom nutes from GH.

It makes me sad to see the level of quality they are getting with literally only using 2 of the cheepest nutrients on market.

I want growing to be harder than using 7g of a powder....but is it?

https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=191645

This, combined with knowing that the best concentrate makers in the world are distilling cannabanoids made from co2 extraction into the pure substances, and re adding what they want back in, makes me wonder what is the point of adding a bunch of shit to your grow?

The results some of these maxi growers are getting from dirt cheep cents per gallon nutes+ cal mag are insane...

WTF is the point of what were trying so hard to do!?!? I want this to be harder.

Maybe its at the point where growing is 110% an art and not a science.


Personally I don't smoke, but I spend like $300-500 on nutes per grow. I could cut that all down to like $15 per grow and maybe have a higher yield. Like WTF? I want this shit to be harder than it is, but is it really that cheap and easy to get the same results? To make more bank? wtf?


The nutrients fall perfectly in line with Johe Cervantes's KISS (keep it simple, stoner) method of growing.


If I tried Maxibloom/Maxigrow, would anybody test them with me? My curiosity is beyond peakead
Click to expand...
Jacks Citrus Feed, mag sulfate, and Dyna Grow Pro-Tekt. You don't need much. Costs maybe $10-15/grow from start to finish.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top