Jhnfrmrby420: kindly let me add my two cents worth. I've never grown with anything other than florescent lighting. Originally in the eighties it was T-8's in a 4' shop light from The Home Depot in a large cabinet I built. It had two 'regular' tubes. I was told it would be better to use 'grow' bulbs and I bought them but I can't say they were any more productive.
I went from T-8's to an Aerogarden Classic with two round lamps that you needed to find with a lit match in the dark when they were switched on. When I found out they had an upgraded hooded on a taller arm/light stand with 'three' higher intensity flat CFL's I jumped at the opportunity and bought one. It worked great with my favorite herb but the flowering was all on top. Obviously it couldn't penetrate the foliage. It made sense to me that if I could illuminate the lower portions of the plants I'd get more buds. Also, it's only fair to add that Aerogarden's lamps are proprietary; you can only get them through Aerogarden, they're expensive and they recommend changing them every six months. Friends with Aerogardens used side lighting but their grow areas soon looked like a snake pit with cords running every which way.
A couple of years ago I got a chance to edit a manuscript written by guy up in northern California named Sebastian. It was about growing medical marijuana with an Aerogarden. Coincidentally, he and I were just starting to tinker with reflective surfaces; aluminum foil, Mylar and white glossy paint. Mylar came out on top every time.
I vaguely remembered something that was driven into my head by a college physics teacher in the late sixties about 'the angle of incidence equaling the angle of refraction.' It made sense to me that if the light could spur flowering on top, and I redirected it to the lower portions of the plant that it should flower there too. I shared that idea with Sebastian and he had the same success.
I bought some white, plastic, waffled lenses for overhead recessed florescent lighting fixtures. Sebastian used cardboard cut outs but I was paranoid of fire. I cut mine down to size, glued Mylar to them and 'aimed them' so that the light was reflected directly back up to the normally shaded portions of my plants. The result was incredible! We got bigger plants and buds all the way down to the planting deck. They weren't as big or as dense as the buds on top but well worth the cost and the effort. The reflectors and Mylar were about fifty some dollars.
I see that Aerogarden is now selling Mylar curtains with adhesive strips you can attach to the hood to take better advantage of their lighting. They're expensive and since they hang straight down I suspect they're not as effective as the ones Sebastian and I have been experimenting with for the last couple of years. I'm also hoping that they're using the 2 mm Mylar not the 1 mm that tears like tissue paper.
The real trick is supporting and aiming them to get the light back up to where you need it, but where there's a will there's a way. I hope this helps. HSA