Cooling LEDs via ir-emission to heat plants same time (new cooler concept art)

Status
Not open for further replies.

CheGueVapo

Well-Known Member
The mission:
Take use of the remaining electricity power of the LED-lamp in terms of excess heat, that is currently in general designs heating the cooler, than passed via convecting ribbs to the air above the lamp to the exhaust-ventilation, instead to take that heat and use it as radiation to cool the LED-board and to pass on the heat to the surfaces of the plants for higher metabolism, without ventilating the heat over the ribbs down again with extra fans or such, no cheats. Thou shall radiate, and shant convect!

In short: create a greenhouse-effect, with the same existing power from the line. Modify only the cooler, nothing else! Use radiation, avoid convection!
Shorter: Build a infraret-heat-mat into the lamp and do not use any additional power for it...


briefing:
bongsmilie dude, im higher like nobody else, for sure, but Im not kidding. This truly is possible with different fixtures. Open your mind to the possibilities that a different fixture gives you to create high-tech lamps. Heat is not gone-energy! It's still there, waiting for re-direction. Better concepts of the fixture not only allows us to take use of the LEDs heat to infrared-radiate heat our greenery effectively on purpose in milder climates, it also unlocks other features that increase the effectiveness of our lamps greatly. Also in the final, lots of the effects that can be gathered by intelligent fixture synnergistically increase the yield per watts! There's lots to gain, while the LED-chips themselves nearing "end" of further great improvings!

A good fixture the makes a good lamp out of good chips, but without the good fixture, the best chips cannot unfold to their full potential.

This chapter is the first of sharing my hole lamp new design, so the ideas that sum up the concept may be yours, in the sense of open source. If you are not interested or have no sense of understanding, please start no argue, but leave the thread.


I already did a small prototype for the breeding chamber. During the construction of that lamp, I made my findings at first, elaborated the scientific explanations causing the concept to work and verified that it is working good in raising the leaf surface temperature with measurements and therefore come to the conclusion in line with scientific reasearch on using infrared in greenhouses is far more effective and also better for plant metabolism than air-heating ever can be, still having low board temperatures for the LEDs possible; so I decided to build such a fixture for my flowering lamp too.

Lets start to get the head around it....

I.) To cool without convention, thus heating the plants with radiation. Kind of magic? Nooo some clever engineering will does the trick.

To achieve the mission goal, I needed a big anodised aluminium cooler of more than two thirds of my square.
Best and cheapest way with high grade of customisability are DIN-notch-rails, thank you german-engineers, this is great stuff!
So I bought nine times 8020 notch 5 rails of the length 1m, that makes a cooler-square size of 0,72 x 1m (0,72m²) for my box 0,9 x 1,2m (1,08m²) square.
These alone weight about 15kg, so the construction needs to be stable.
To achieve stability I connected the notch-rails with enough steel-screwed steel-plate-connectors in steel-notchstones.
Also I needed a strong ergonomic grip/handle to lift the beast for connecting the mounting-cords when installing the lamp.

Step 1 - the core
Assembling those parts of it the right way to distribute the weight over the construction propperly. This was no great brainer. It took me less than an hour and the resulted bare upper side looked this:
cooler.jpg

Im very satisfied with the stability of the cooler-fixture itself and the handle-stability. It seems "heavyweight" but any small girl can deadlift 20kg and the box/tents can handle it too, so I'm ok with that whopper.


The LEDs later going to be fixed with screws into the free blank notches of the bottom side with notchstones.
I an have any position for any module on this system-rails/notches.

Now lets get deeper into the "how to radiate" the heat towards the plants.
The LED modules from the bottom side is where the heat comes from.
A blackbody would emit all directions the same, but the heat in our scenario isn't generated from within the body in the middle, but is coming from one side, the led-platina/chip-side.

This means our cooler has different temperatures on different sides. :idea:
The top-side and the outer sides going to be cooler than the LED-side, where the heat comes from.
According to the law of Stefan Boltzman a surface at double the temperature to its ambient emits 16 times the heat-radiation.

This also means that a side that is only 1/8th hotter than the other sites compared to the surrounding air emits double the heat-rationen than the other sides. Wow! What does that mean?

Lets assume the ambient temperature around the lamp in running operation is 25°C.
Lets assume the coolers led-side heats up to 41°C... thats a differential +16°K

When the top side now heats up to only 39°C (-2°K), because of the differential delta... thats 1/8th lower than the LEDs-down-side.

This means without isolating the other sides at all, from the start, barely open, the down-side already emits double the heat radiation than the other sides... only because of this slight temperature differential. Amazing finding that Stefan-Boltzman made in the 19th century ;) !

So at this point of the construction... more than 66% of the heat already leaving the down side! Great!

How to maximise the effect now?

When we isolate the other sides further against air-heat-convetion and against ir-heat-radiation-loss, than the led-side heats up only another +1°K and radiates nearly ALL the heat from the cooler. Thats remarbably and it is really that easy! It's easy to isolate the other sides.

Blank aluminium reflects 95% of the infrared radiation, unlike anodised which absorbs/emits 90%.... same material, different surface-texture. Magic? No, just physics. The atoms doesn't matter to the heat, nor does the color, that only matters for visible light, but for heatradiation only the materials outer surface/texture/structure/arrangements matters. The more surface on a microscopic level, then the MORE surface is emmiting at the same "square"... the rougher, the more surface, the more emission.


Step 2: Directing the Infrared
Reflect IR the top and sides of the cooler back into the cooler and hinder convection... for the top side, i choose a cheap "reflectix"-foil (not the original, but a similar product). For the sides around i picked 1mm-aluminium plates, but dont screwed them with heat contact directly, just layed a rubber ring inbetween... and I made them plates bigger, 5 cm down the led-side, because i want to apply a high reflective mirror-foil on the inside, to reflect sideways light and heat through the entire growing space... but thats part of the next step.

The intermediate result looks like this:

<<At this point i must interrupt with a "under construction", sorry. It's a live process, please be patient, this project is not a in haste!>>

This is what follows

Step 3: inner mirror reflecting
Step 4: modules, spectrum, placement, mastering the 60khrs
Step 5: Re-reflecting the green photons from the plants towards the plants (enhance the green photon yield)
Step 6: Installing switches for tweaking the blue spectrum "down" for lowering color temperature <3000K
Step 7: best drivers and how to DIM them intelligently via easily 0...10Vsensors without energy-consuming processor
Step 8: the automatic-override manual control board... you take control, any time you want, semi or full
Step 9: the IP65-sealing, safe from water from all sides, protecting the LEDs


Just to give you a hint on what it may look like in the end, the small lamp prototype looks like this, just a lot bigger, and a lot different
prototype.jpg
The extra IRwarming effect is present.... the lamp operates cool below 40°C

This is the inner reflector effect (mono ehancement at early stage, compared to the final above):
innenreflektor2.jpg
To give you a clue what it does... direct the light, so less hit the walls at the outer LEDs and leaks above the lamp.

The overall high size allows for good radiation, white special light enhancing tape or white-matt coating increases emissivity of the aluminium higher than 0.9 to at about 0.95 (from a max 1 ideal blackbody), still reflecting +94% of the PAR light reflectance of the plants back at them.

The lamps allows for ultra short distance, still super high homogenity, increased PPFD. The synergizing effect stockpile.

Needless to say the system-effiency at fuill load+1000µmols beeing around 3,5 PPE !!! ... and you efficiently use the heat!

That runs out about 98-99% overall system efficieny....and over about 13 years non-stop growing a luminance maintenance over 90%, aiming 100 CRI, for sure.

Unlocking a hole new level of efficiency! Stay tuned. I'll bump it with any next step! Im going to comparethe hard in hard test to my actual high intense grow trying to drive that to the max, to not have it tooo easy on beating myself. The run goes with NIR... its crazy valid booster, I recommend it (6-8%)

28th day after switching the lights:
bt28.jpgbt28-2.jpg
Circles is the NIR positions 90° and 150° chips of 850nm and 960nm.... :fire: TRY! You find them from osram or lumileds...

49th:
bt49.jpgbuddie.jpg

Cheers!... the landlord!

The NASA cant do anthing i cant to better...
 
Last edited:

CheGueVapo

Well-Known Member
I measure two things.
Ambient temperatur (air sensor)
Leaf temperature (IR-sensor)

I can compare it to that values from my standard ribb-cooler lamp in the same room with the same sensors. This lamp has 400W for around 1100µmols and nearly NO IR radiation... convecting all excess heat very good.

Then by the comparison i know:
How much does the new lamp heats the ambient better than my old lamp with LESS power.... 300W ONLY to have the same PAR light! Plus the IR heat from the excess heat!
How much does the leaf surface temperature increases on top of it thanks to the IR radiation i introduced.

Finally i can switch off the light... and measure the temperature of the LED-site still showing the board-temperature... that slowly decreasing, that means it radiates it off! One could make that IR-radiation visible with a FLIR-camera after switching the lights off... still the heat radiates until it cools down to ambient... but i cant afford a FLIR... the lamp is going to be expensive enough :)


Looks like you spent a lot of time on this.
About half a year this project planning phase, not every day, the experience i put into is about 15 years of growing and 10 years of constructing my own DIY lamps.
Its not my first lamp, but it should be my last!
Undiagnosed ADHD and nothing else to do ;)
 
Last edited:

Milky Weed

Well-Known Member
Hey man I’m trying to wrap my head around what you did exactly, did you add extra ir lights to the board? And if so what way are they facing?
 

CheGueVapo

Well-Known Member
No extra IR chips.... i have NIR chips, but thats a different story.

I turned the LEDs excess heat into IR radiation. By using a big flat high emissive surface cooler and preventing the heat from convecting to the air or radiating other sides than the plants direction. So it MUST radiate towards the plants... is the only way of possible cooling left.

So it must radiate off all the heat towards the plant to cool itself down.

It does that very well keeping LED temperature lower than 40°C thanks to the big size and the high emissivity.

Simple but effective heating source for the plants with energy you ALREADY cconsumed for the lighing before ;)
Just redirect it to IR
 

Milky Weed

Well-Known Member
I turned the LEDs excess heat into IR radiation. By using a big flat high emissive surface cooler and preventing the heat from convecting to the air or radiating other sides than the plants direction. So it MUST radiate towards the plants... is the only way of possible cooling left.

So it must radiate off all the heat towards the plant to cool itself down.

It does that very well keeping LED temperature lower than 40°C

Simple but effective heating source for the plants with energy you ALREADY created for the lighing ;)
Ahhh ok now I understand, this makes more sense. That’s very interesting, thank you!
 

MidnightSun72

Well-Known Member
I measure two things.
Ambient temperatur (air sensor)
Leaf temperature (IR-sensor)

I can compare it to that values from my standard ribb-cooler lamp in the same room with the same sensors. This lamp has 400W for around 1100µmols and nearly NO IR radiation... convecting all excess heat very good.

Then by the comparison i know:
How much does the new lamp heats the ambient better than my old lamp with LESS power.... 300W ONLY to have the same PAR light! Plus the IR heat from the excess heat!
How much does the leaf surface temperature increases on top of it thanks to the IR radiation i introduced.

Finally i can switch off the light... and measure the temperature of the LED-site still showing the board-temperature... that slowly decreasing, that means it radiates it off! One could make that IR-radiation visible with a FLIR-camera after switching the lights off... still the heat radiates until it cools down to ambient... but i cant afford a FLIR... the lamp is going to be expensive enough :)



About half a year this project planning phase, not every day, the experience i put into is about 15 years...
Its not my first lamp, but it should be my last!
Undiagnosed ADHD and nothing else to do ;)
Hey man I’m trying to wrap my head around what you did exactly, did you add extra ir lights to the board? And if so what way are they facing?
if I understood correctly he's using a reflective foil abover the heat sink of the light to prevent the escape of heat from the top side of the fixture. This forces all the heat out the bottom.

in my mind this hinders the heat sink efficacy. But the method relies on trapping that heat to be emitted as IR radiation rather than letting the aluminum cool via convection (air moving across The heatsink)

would be curious to see what the measurements of IR photons before and after the reflective surface is added.

Edit: I've heard about this same concept being used for cooling something in an insulated box with an open top. The IR allowed to radiate its heat into the sky (space) causes the temperature of the object drop.
 

CheGueVapo

Well-Known Member
in my mind this hinders the heat sink efficacy. But the method relies on trapping that heat to be emitted as IR radiation rather than letting the aluminum cool via convection (air moving across The heatsink)
I had all this discussion in another german forum over 23 pages and they are all wrong, im fed up arguing with people that dont understand the physics of stefan boltzman law... i measured it! It stays cold!
prototype.jpg
Completely enclosed... only radiating the heat.... below 40°C... @ 150W... only the small breeding lamp.

The heatsink efficiacys is relative... who cares if 37 or 38 or 34°C it doesnt make a difference THAT low!
Compared to generous lamps that are 55-65°C usually... see!

Dont make me argue over pages again... STOP IT! IT WORKS! I have it working already in small scale... thats why I build it now bigger for the floering chamber.

I dont DO build this lamp because Im UNSURE.... or experimenting... it works! Or do you say im halucinating without popping shrooms?

I measured the LED boards temperature via heatcontact sensor, so I am absolutely sure my concept works as intended!

WAIT and let me finish my project... read and stop arguing this way! Dont spamm your doubts here forcing an endless discussion about the science of it! Just WATCH IT thx!
 
Last edited:

MidnightSun72

Well-Known Member
I had all this discussion in another german forum over 23 pages and they are all wrong, im fed up arguing with people that dont understand the physics of stefan boltzman law... i measured it! It stays cold!

Dont make me argue over pages again...

WAIT and let me finish my project... reads and stop arguing this way! Dont spamm your doubts here forcing an endless discussion! Just WATCH IT thx!
Lol.
I understand the theory but the heat sink has to get hot for this to work. One way you can determine if this will be 100% Ok to connect to the T-case measuring points on the LED. If the case temperature is within acceptable operating temps then no big deal, the lower face of the aluminum has enough surface to dissipate the heat from the diodes Via radiation alone.

Just keep in mind the face pointing downward only release about 50% of the heat compared 100% heat release rate for the top and sides of a heat sink. I am not sure if measuring the face of the LED is enough vs checking the actual case temperature. Anyway if the face of the LED is only reaching 41*C then I think the LEDs will be fine. But on a setup that's already too hot I think it needs to be applied with understanding and prudence.
 

Milky Weed

Well-Known Member
I had all this discussion in another german forum over 23 pages and they are all wrong, im fed up arguing with people that dont understand the physics of stefan boltzman law... i measured it! It stays cold!
View attachment 5000777
Completely enclosed... only radiating the heat.... below 40°C... @ 150W... only the small breeding lamp.

Dont make me argue over pages again... STOP IT! IT WORKS!

I dont DO build this lamp because Im UNSURE....

WAIT and let me finish my project... read and stop arguing this way! Dont spamm your doubts here forcing an endless discussion about the science of it! Just WATCH IT thx!
Well you can’t expect to post in a non- pure scientific forum and expect there not to be some type of discussion on redundancies.

So if this heat/ir reflector is behind the led’s and the heat sink, does that not mean that heat has to travel through the heat sink and the led boards again before being transferred to the plant’s surface?

I would think this would increase the heat overall because it has to re-pass through all of those components, unless I don’t understand how ir works. (I probably don’t)
 

MidnightSun72

Well-Known Member
Well you can’t expect to post in a non- pure scientific forum and expect there not to be some type of discussion on redundancies.

So if this heat/ir reflector is behind the led’s and the heat sink, does that not mean that heat has to travel through the heat sink and the led boards again before being transferred to the plant’s surface?

I would think this would increase the heat overall because it has to re-pass through all of those components, unless I don’t understand how ir works. (I probably don’t)
Essentially the heat sink will get hotter and that hot face will start emitting IR photons

I also think the grow room fans will still force convention on the bottom side of the fixture. It's an interesting idea. And he is referencing real science. I am just not sure the amount radiated is appreciable enough without measuring it directly.
 

green_machine_two9er

Well-Known Member
I had all this discussion in another german forum over 23 pages and they are all wrong, im fed up arguing with people that dont understand the physics of stefan boltzman law... i measured it! It stays cold!
View attachment 5000777
Completely enclosed... only radiating the heat.... below 40°C... @ 150W... only the small breeding lamp.

The heatsink efficiacys is relative... who cares if 37 or 38 or 34°C it doesnt make a difference THAT low!
Compared to generous lamps that are 55-65°C usually... see!

Dont make me argue over pages again... STOP IT! IT WORKS! I have it working already in small scale... thats why I build it now bigger for the floering chamber.

I dont DO build this lamp because Im UNSURE.... or experimenting... it works! Or do you say im halucinating without popping shrooms?

WAIT and let me finish my project... read and stop arguing this way! Dont spamm your doubts here forcing an endless discussion about the science of it! Just WATCH IT thx!
That last part sounded a lot like my old preacher. Doubting Thomas and all.
I’m just trying to wrap my head around the actual goal here? I mean couldn’t you turn your thermostat higher and use fans to move warm air around.
 

CheGueVapo

Well-Known Member
I mean couldn’t you turn your thermostat higher and use fans to move warm air around.
That consumes more energy and requires expensive and ineffective air heating. Always the same stupid fucking trolling arguments of the people who dont understand radiation... thats just light right? No heat radiates! Its fundamental process of everything around you. LEARN THAT... but not from bugging me with your questions and your simple minded clues from yesterday.

I already have spend the electicity to create the PAR light.... so i have already electricity creating heat. The project is to use THAT not heating the air.... dont you get it... why you start trolling?

If you want to get your head around, read the initial post again. If you dont get it, read again. Then google the topics, learn the physical laws. Stop spamming the thread playing DUMB!

If you still dont get it... LEAVE THE THREAD! JUST BEAT IT!
 

MidnightSun72

Well-Known Member
That last part sounded a lot like my old preacher. Doubting Thomas and all.
I’m just trying to wrap my head around the actual goal here? I mean couldn’t you turn your thermostat higher and use fans to move warm air around.
IR photons help the plants grow. They might as well be par photons. So based on that his goal is clever.

Look up black body emission.


That consumes more energy and requires expensive and ineffective air heating. Always the same stupid fucking trolling arguments of the people who dont understand radiation... thats just light right? No heat radiates! Its fundamental process of everything around you. LEARN THAT... but not from bugging me with your quuestions and your simple minded clues from yesterday.

I already have spend the electicity to create the PAR light.... so i have already electricity creating heat.

If you want to get your head around, read the inition post again. If you dont get it, read again. Thengoogle the topics, learn the physical laws. Stop spamming the thread.
it consumes no more energy. Your air conditioner will work less hard by allowing it cool to a higher temperature rather than a lower one. Whether you convert that extra heat to IR or not. Your air conditioner now has to cool the room to a lower temp to keep the leaf surface temps in range.
 

green_machine_two9er

Well-Known Member
That consumes more energy and requires expensive and ineffective air heating. Always the same stupid fucking trolling arguments of the people who dont understand radiation... thats just light right? No heat radiates! Its fundamental process of everything around you. LEARN THAT... but not from bugging me with your questions and your simple minded clues from yesterday.

I already have spend the electicity to create the PAR light.... so i have already electricity creating heat. The project is to use THAT not heating the air.... dont you get it... why you start trolling?

If you want to get your head around, read the initiol post again. If you dont get it, read again. Then google the topics, learn the physical laws. Stop spamming the thread playing DUMB!
Ok if you say so. Not sure why your so hostile. I don’t remember you from yesterday….
 

Milky Weed

Well-Known Member
That consumes more energy and requires expensive and ineffective air heating. Always the same stupid fucking trolling arguments of the people who dont understand radiation... thats just light right? No heat radiates! Its fundamental process of everything around you. LEARN THAT... but not from bugging me with your questions and your simple minded clues from yesterday.

I already have spend the electicity to create the PAR light.... so i have already electricity creating heat. The project is to use THAT not heating the air.... dont you get it... why you start trolling?

If you want to get your head around, read the initial post again. If you dont get it, read again. Then google the topics, learn the physical laws. Stop spamming the thread playing DUMB!

If you still dont get it... LEAVE THE THREAD! JUST BEAT IT!
People just aren’t understanding your goals, are you doing this as a project to increase overall design efficiency? I believe people are mentioning other factors because this post comes off as your having issues with the lights, not inventing something new if you get my jist.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top