Cover Oregon exchange is worse than healthcare.gov...

Curious as to where you got your (false) information. I have a patient whose daughter has been covered through Cover Oregon since she started college 2 months ago.
 
Curious as to where you got your (false) information. I have a patient whose daughter has been covered through Cover Oregon since she started college 2 months ago.

I posted a link in the first post...I have been on cover oregon sense last December..We don't count in new enrollments, the link is talking about the new sign ups for the jan 1st dead line..
 
I like the part about the Washington state exchange having to notify around 8,000 people that their "subsidy" would be less than originally quoted to them. I can hear it now....."Damn, cutting our food stamps AND stealing our subsidy, what's next, raising our Section 8 housing rent?"
 
I posted a link in the first post...I have been on cover oregon sense last December..We don't count in new enrollments, the link is talking about the new sign ups for the jan 1st dead line..


Isn't that a lot like opening a theater at 6:00 for a 7:15 movie and only counting the folks who came after 7? That's why states likes ours who set up their own exchanges over the past year in COOPERATION with the ACA have a head start and have aggressively worked to enroll their citizens. Doesn't that actually speak to the efficiency of cooperation that so many signed up prior to the official launch of the ACA?
 
Obamacare is terrible. Finally, obama is seen as governing, and he sucks at it.
For the past five years Obama had been campaigning to save us all from evil insurance, bankers, corporations, credit cards, and of course evil republicans.
People are finally starting to notice Obama is an amateur. The more he talks, the worse he makes it on himself.
 
Isn't that a lot like opening a theater at 6:00 for a 7:15 movie and only counting the folks who came after 7? That's why states likes ours who set up their own exchanges over the past year in COOPERATION with the ACA have a head start and have aggressively worked to enroll their citizens. Doesn't that actually speak to the efficiency of cooperation that so many signed up prior to the official launch of the ACA?

Thats funny..because the movie started over a month ago...You are counting the 6 oclock people and everybody else is counting the after 7 oclock people...
 
Thats funny..because the movie started over a month ago...You are counting the 6 oclock people and everybody else is counting the after 7 oclock people...

His analogy works. He uses logic and reason.

Your counter does not. And having to explain why your reasoning does not work is a complete waste of time. I'm merely pointing out the obvious at this point.
 
His analogy works. He uses logic and reason.

Your counter does not. And having to explain why your reasoning does not work is a complete waste of time. I'm merely pointing out the obvious at this point.

He is counting the OREGON HEALTH PLAN people that have been signed up for years, like me....Do I have to remind you that enrollment started Oct 1st of this year? Thats when the counter started, not years ago...New enrollee's get it?
 
He is counting the OREGON HEALTH PLAN people that have been signed up for years, like me....Do I have to remind you that enrollment started Oct 1st of this year? Thats when the counter started, not years ago...New enrollee's get it?

So let me get an understanding of this. You are currently on OREGON HEALTH PLAN, as in you currently have insurance?

Off topic a bit, but can I ask you, how much you are paying, has your rates increased? If so, by how much? Do you have preexisting conditions? Are they continuing to cover you?

Im just trying to understand what you are complaining about.
 
Isn't that a lot like opening a theater at 6:00 for a 7:15 movie and only counting the folks who came after 7? That's why states likes ours who set up their own exchanges over the past year in COOPERATION with the ACA have a head start and have aggressively worked to enroll their citizens. Doesn't that actually speak to the efficiency of cooperation that so many signed up prior to the official launch of the ACA?

I wouldn't be using the word efficient when 75% of enrollments had to use paper applications.
The same goes with claiming so many signed up, 6,700 isn't so many.
 
I wouldn't be using the word efficient when 75% of enrollments had to use paper applications.
The same goes with claiming so many signed up, 6,700 isn't so many.

So are you upset with the ticket counter or the movie?
 
Back
Top