Rahz
Well-Known Member
1000w is the total for all lamps. Total grams was 1525, 1.525 GPW
CRI test and Mcree weighted results
- Thread starter Rahz
- Start date
Rahz
Well-Known Member
Perhaps, but if that's the case the 3000/80 should do better than the 3000/90. Since 3000/70 was also at the top I would expect 3000/80 to perform similar to the other 3000 samples and for 2700/80 to perform similar to 2700/90.
At any rate, as mentioned there were issues with the grow. Additionally the sample size of 4 plants per lamp is small compared to what a clinical study would use. More testing is needed.
sixstring2112
Well-Known Member
Yeah 1 important variable would be the trimmers.if these were all trimmed by 1 person good.if you involve several people then it gets sketchy lol.i noticed the other night my old lady was getting tired after 6+hours and started leaving some extra leaf on them nugglets,i wanted to say something but i didnt want to lose my best trimmer lol.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Plant Lobbyist
Well-Known Member
BRIX measurements would also be nice to compare.
Double blind trials for quality? A little excessive but how else would you do it?
wietefras
Well-Known Member
Yeah, it's really easy to do tests like this and get truly reliable results. Even the big clinical grows often have issues during their tests and those are usually caused by "small" issues which we can't even measure.
thetr33man
Well-Known Member
Id like to see removed vegetative matter saved, dried and weighed also. Then we could get a bud ratio for the plants under different spectrums as well...
weed-whacker
Well-Known Member
yup, I look forward to the next test.
interesting to see the 3000/90 performing so well...mmmm
Plant Lobbyist
Well-Known Member
Total organic produced weight is one way to compare.
Quality is going to be highly subjective. Just like whether farm fresh organic raised chicken is better than your common mass poultry raising systems.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Bullshit. Quality is directly related to percentage of resin to total dry weight.
Plant Lobbyist
Well-Known Member
I am referring to individual preference. Some people react differently to terpine profiles as has been demonstrated so what might be best for one person may not be so good for another.
The quality vs quantity discussion will always be there. History has taught us that the only correct answer is as much quantity of the highest quality possible.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
That's a different question; what the terpene profile is composed of is a different metric than how much of it is produced.
Plant Lobbyist
Well-Known Member
But that would be a great metric to use. Run clones under the different lights to see if there is an impact on the profiles.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Sure would, this is work that desperately needs doing. We can thank the Feds for holding up this and many other needed studies on cannabis and its effects on people.
SSGrower
Well-Known Member
Would be nice if we could re-work colorado law to allow citizens to take samples to labs. How bout you states that just went legal last year? hopefully that part of your bills weren't based on Co's.
Nice work on the tests rhaz.
Plant Lobbyist
Well-Known Member
Chinese medicine has been promoting its use for thousands of years. Lots of studies done outside of your country also, but yes, your gov has put your country behind in this area.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
We have a long-standing bad habit of putting policy before science. It's a nasty blind spot indicative of our political climate.
frica
Well-Known Member
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
They do some weird shit to eggs in that country.
robincnn
Well-Known Member
I would have expected 70>80>90 or 70<80<90
Interesting results 90>70>80
90 yielded the most and finished faster too
Thanks for sharing the CRI results. Good luck with next series of tests