syd barrett
Well-Known Member
I was semi-joking.
Yep there are faults on phylos system ,built wrong from the beginning .Shady practices there too but not the subject right now.Also a few stuff not labeled correctly.But seeing if something is a clone or not I think is accurate as far as i know.And his chem s1 s for example show as directly related not clones.It was better before they stopped the project,you could see direct progeny or more distant relation.
It would be interesting to ask him what he thinks about that,maybe he has talked about it in an interview or sth?Cause if he sent s1s besides the clones he did it to see for himself I bet.
Which clone onlys are you referring to out of curiosity?
Yep there are faults on phylos system ,built wrong from the beginning .Shady practices there too but not the subject right now.Also a few stuff not labeled correctly.But seeing if something is a clone or not I think is accurate as far as i know.And his chem s1 s for example show as directly related not clones.It was better before they stopped the project,you could see direct progeny or more distant relation.
It would be interesting to ask him what he thinks about that,maybe he has talked about it in an interview or sth?Cause if he sent s1s besides the clones he did it to see for himself I bet.
Which clone onlys are you referring to out of curiosity?