DEA losing power and they're super butt hurt about it

Dr Kynes · May 20, 2014

abandonconflict said:
http://blumenauer.house.gov/images/stories/2014/02-12-14 Blumenauer Rescheduling Letter.pdf

repeating the same bullshit link to a bullshit publicity stunt by some bullshit congressional dilettantes, AFTER the steps laid out in the law have been detailed is simply BULLSHIT.

you will note in the description of the steps to reschedule, youll see no references to Barry Seotoro, or congress.
it is a REGULATORY process, not a constitutional or legislative process.

as usual you are wrong, and most likely failed 8th grade social studies

try reading this, but beware, it's longer than kim kardashian's twatter posts, so you may have to take a few breaks during the course of your perusal.

bracket your potty times accordingly

http://www.fda.gov/newsevents/testimony/ucm115087.htm

abandonconflict · May 20, 2014

The commander in chief has all of the executive authority of the executive branch of the gov't. The DEA and HHS are both parts of the executive branch and all of the authority necessary to reschedule cannabis under the controlled substances act fall under these two departments. Therefore the commander in chief has the authority to reschedule cannabis.

I can pretty much just keep repeating it because I'm right and I win.

In fact I'm double winning because you are defending Obama.

sheskunk · May 20, 2014

If "winning" on RIU means something to you then you are losing.

abandonconflict · May 20, 2014

If winning on RIU is actually losing then losing on RIU is actually a clear message from the universe that you should probably go lose a few kilos.

Dr Kynes · May 20, 2014

abandonconflict said:
The commander in chief has all of the executive authority of the executive branch of the gov't. The DEA and HHS are both parts of the executive branch and all of the authority necessary to reschedule cannabis under the controlled substances act fall under these two departments. Therefore the commander in chief has the authority to reschedule cannabis.

I can pretty much just keep repeating it because I'm right and I win.

In fact I'm double winning because you are defending Obama.

DEA HHS the FDA, and DOJ are in fact part of the executive branch, but Barry doesnt have the power to reschedule cannabis by fiat.

even if he did have that power under the laws (which he dont) he doesnt have the (Plenary or Moral) authority to do it.

Barry Seotoro couldnt command a dog to heel, much less ride herd on unwilling mandarins, to force them to do as he bids.

also, if calling Barry ineffectual is "defending" him, then i guess i am defending that incompetent buffoon

a president with balls would keep sacking the chiefs of the HHS, DEA, DOJ and FDA until they did as commanded, but Mr Seotoro lacks the prunes for that course of action

abandonconflict · May 20, 2014

So he has the authority, just not the balls.

Well then I agree.

UncleBuck · May 20, 2014

sheskunk said:
Send me some more dick pics. The last ones you sent were awesome!! I like how you squeeze it to make it turn purple.

if that's true then he's my hero.

abandonconflict · May 20, 2014

UncleBuck said:
if that's true then he's my hero.

She isn't my type.

UncleBuck · May 20, 2014

sheskunk said:
That's not what you said last night. We'll talk about it later when you Skype me again.

what percentage of you can fit in front of a webcam?

abandonconflict · May 20, 2014

You know you're disgusting when the best strategy you can come up with to embarrass someone is to follow them around and make people think that you are involved with them.

Dr Kynes · May 20, 2014

abandonconflict said:
So he has the authority, just not the balls.

Well then I agree.

he has not the power under the law, he has not the authority under the constitution, but he COULD sack cabinet level secretaries until he got his way but he he hasnt the balls to do that.

UncleBuck · May 20, 2014

abandonconflict said:
You know you're disgusting when the best strategy you can come up with to embarrass someone is to follow them around and make people think that you are involved with them.

i wanna see if she goes from stalking to ignoring anyone as quickly as i got her to.

abandonconflict · May 20, 2014

Dr Kynes said:
he has not the power under the law, he has not the authority under the constitution, but he COULD sack cabinet level secretaries until he got his way but he he hasnt the balls to do that.

Nevermind, I don't agree with you.

sheskunk · May 20, 2014

abandonconflict said:
You know you're disgusting when the best strategy you can come up with to embarrass someone is to follow them around and make people think that you are involved with them.

So I'm disgusting. As if I care.

sheskunk · May 20, 2014

abandonconflict said:
Nevermind, I don't agree with you.

Hahaha, lost your train of thought did you.

Red1966 · May 20, 2014

Dr Kynes said:
DEA HHS the FDA, and DOJ are in fact part of the executive branch, but Barry doesnt have the power to reschedule cannabis by fiat.

even if he did have that power under the laws (which he dont) he doesnt have the (Plenary or Moral) authority to do it.

Barry Seotoro couldnt command a dog to heel, much less ride herd on unwilling mandarins, to force them to do as he bids.

also, if calling Barry ineffectual is "defending" him, then i guess i am defending that incompetent buffoon

a president with balls would keep sacking the chiefs of the HHS, DEA, DOJ and FDA until they did as commanded, but Mr Seotoro lacks the prunes for that course of action

He reversed Congress' vote on the Dream Act by fiat. He illegally appointed party minions to office without the consent of Congress. He ignores the law.

Dr Kynes · May 21, 2014

abandonconflict said:
Nevermind, I don't agree with you.

yeah, i guess this link: http://www.fda.gov/newsevents/testimony/ucm115087.htm
http://www.fda.gov/newsevents/testimony/ucm115087.htm
was too long for you.

if only you could read shit that is more complex than your average microwave burrito directions, then you might discover that your refusal to "agree" with me is irrelevant

Canna Sylvan · May 21, 2014

sheskunk said:
So I'm disgusting. As if I care.

If that's you in your avatar, then I think you're adorable.

Harrekin · May 21, 2014

BigNBushy said:
Yes and no.

Technically both sides are right and wrong.

For Obama to reschedule, he would have to compel someone else to actually do it.

That person (s) have been pointed out by Doer and Dr.K.

The point, legally Obama cannot do it.

In practice, if he wanted it done, it would very likely get done rather quickly.

But the proper legal channel for this is not executive order, but regulating agency decision.

Therefore, I judge Doer to be more right here than abandonconflict.

Who appoints the people who make the decisions?

Oh shit nigga...its the President.

Obama cannot directly reschedule, but he can just fire people until someone with some logic comes along and complies with his request.

If he WANTED to do it, he would/could, but he keeps you pot-smoking fucktards happy with lip-service.

Its pathetic to see Kynes and Doer slobbering Obama cock now, you maggots should be ashamed.

I hope your next President bans MJ of all kinds, then you'll see how much of an ineffectual dipshit Obama is and how he essentially changed nothing.

Hope and Change = Hope for Change.

Still hoping, kiddos?

Harrekin · May 21, 2014

ChesusRice said:
Still wouldnt make weed legal and it would violate a bunch of treatys we have

and of course there is this

BOLLING: What would you call a guy who not only used cocaine, but dealt cocaine in high school and/or college? What would you call that kind of guy?
GUTFELD: The president.
[laughter]
BOLLING: Besides "president."
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2012/05/11/updated-fox-news-smears-obama-as-a-drug-dealer/186407

I thought this was his second term, and he has nothing to worry about because hes not facing reelection?

That was YOUR prediction, want me to pull up the thread again?

DEA losing power and they're super butt hurt about it

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member