Groucho123456
Member
I am planning to move from years of indoor/outdoor soil grow to indoor hydro production units. I am trying to decide on which hydro technique will be best for me. It needs to be scaleable. I am considering both ebb/flow and bubbles. Please help me clarify my thinking:
Bubblers:
Pros:
Easy, cheap, readily available materials.
Cons:
Best to keep one plant per container this would be a drag for large systems.
Airstones can plug up.
Must have air system and nutrient flow system.
Possible air pump failure but redundancy would be easy to integrate.
Ebb/flow
Pros:
Easy cheap, readily available materials.
Can put multiple plants in large, single containers.
Cons:
Possible water pump failure but redundancy would be easy to integrate.
From what I am reading online, people using bubblers link up multiple buckets and supply them with nutrients from a reservoir and some even use a controller bucket to keep levels even. Seems to me this is almost everything you need to do a ebb/flow except for timers on the pumps. Why not do both? Would the ebb/flow expose too much root to air between floods? It seems the bubbler method produces massive root systems. I believe the only difference between the two systems as far as pots go is the bubblers use pots with many more holes, allowing the roots to find their way below to the nutrients. The ebb/flow pots have fewer holes keeping most of the roots inside the pot. But the pots are about the same size, right? So ebb/flow has a smaller root system, right? So is combining the two methods not practical? What would the issues be?
Bubblers:
Pros:
Easy, cheap, readily available materials.
Cons:
Best to keep one plant per container this would be a drag for large systems.
Airstones can plug up.
Must have air system and nutrient flow system.
Possible air pump failure but redundancy would be easy to integrate.
Ebb/flow
Pros:
Easy cheap, readily available materials.
Can put multiple plants in large, single containers.
Cons:
Possible water pump failure but redundancy would be easy to integrate.
From what I am reading online, people using bubblers link up multiple buckets and supply them with nutrients from a reservoir and some even use a controller bucket to keep levels even. Seems to me this is almost everything you need to do a ebb/flow except for timers on the pumps. Why not do both? Would the ebb/flow expose too much root to air between floods? It seems the bubbler method produces massive root systems. I believe the only difference between the two systems as far as pots go is the bubblers use pots with many more holes, allowing the roots to find their way below to the nutrients. The ebb/flow pots have fewer holes keeping most of the roots inside the pot. But the pots are about the same size, right? So ebb/flow has a smaller root system, right? So is combining the two methods not practical? What would the issues be?