Afgan King
Well-Known Member
No it was a loud mouth with no evidence to prove anything he says because he's just read books and not done them himselfWas it AfganKing?
No it was a loud mouth with no evidence to prove anything he says because he's just read books and not done them himselfWas it AfganKing?
Seriously, are you on crack?No it was a loud mouth with no evidence to prove anything he says because he's just read books and not done them himself
No sounds like you are tho with all your books and no real plantsSeriously, are you on crack?
Show me your reports as in the ones you did don't worry I'll waitSeriously, are you on crack?
Doing it in my journal this run just flipped to flower gonna take my biggest plant and not touch it no lollipop or defoliation I'll prove my point unlike the guy who doesn't grow I got 10 gorilla glue #4, 4 pura vida, a Kandy Kush and a sonic screwdriver for hash and smoke and gonna take my biggest gg4http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/07/30/488083554/luke-aikins-becomes-first-person-to-jump-from-a-plane-without-a-parachute
a side by side should be done. defoliation, bud removal and untouched. in the same water source, under same light and same number of branches. the test would have to be repeated a few times to get some average number though.
You mean you sister or your mom?Show me your reports as in the ones you did don't worry I'll wait
That's cute you don't have a grow. I'll ask the guy who doesn't grow cannabis about how to grow cannabis.....sounds asinine right?You mean you sister or your mom?
U JUST A BIG ASS RETARD!! I DONT ARGUE WITH RETARDED PEOPLE THAT SAY I SAW THIS BEEN DONE AND I SAW THAT BEEN DONE HAVE U ACTUALLY TRY IT MF. AND THATS MY LAST MESSAGE FOR U RETARD MF GROW UP LITTLE KIDDOLmao if you see an amateur who can't even keep his plants stress free enough to stop fox tailing would you believe him?
How so? I guarantee my smaller plants will pull more weight all of themusing the biggest plant compromises the test. the test would have to be standardized and repeated to really validate the results.
Seriously man, it's been done. Use the search bar. You'll see people that post it here a bunch.using the biggest plant compromises the test. the test would have to be standardized and repeated to really validate the results.
Show some foxtails please and yes I've done it in a setting of 5000 plantsU JUST A BIG ASS RETARD!! I DONT ARGUE WITH RETARDED PEOPLE THAT SAY I SAW THIS BEEN DONE AND I SAW THAT BEEN DONE HAVE U ACTUALLY TRY IT MF. AND THATS MY LAST MESSAGE FOR U RETARD MF GROW UP LITTLE KIDDO
They don't do it like I do asshat sit back and read the journal you'll watch 9 smaller plants each individually pull more weight than my single largest not touched. Cuz guess what I grow and can do it you can'tSeriously man, it's been done. Use the search bar. You'll see people that post it here a bunch.
Thank god,U JUST A BIG ASS RETARD!! I DONT ARGUE WITH RETARDED PEOPLE THAT SAY I SAW THIS BEEN DONE AND I SAW THAT BEEN DONE HAVE U ACTUALLY TRY IT MF. AND THATS MY LAST MESSAGE FOR U RETARD MF GROW UP LITTLE KIDDO
You do realize I took care of over a 1000 plants at a time doing it to each of them please take your country ass somewhere elseU JUST A BIG ASS RETARD!! I DONT ARGUE WITH RETARDED PEOPLE THAT SAY I SAW THIS BEEN DONE AND I SAW THAT BEEN DONE HAVE U ACTUALLY TRY IT MF. AND THATS MY LAST MESSAGE FOR U RETARD MF GROW UP LITTLE KIDDO
jajajajakajakajajajajajajShow some foxtails please and yes I've done it in a setting of 5000 plants
Wouldn't it prove my point ten fold then?because the test needs to be standardized, thats proper procedure really. and it also has to be repeated to obtain an average. this is whats involved with research and development. using plants of different sizes will compromise the results