DG's to be replaced by caregiver system?
- Thread starter c ray
- Start date
JungleStrikeGuy
Well-Known Member
Yeah this basically sounds like BS.
1st - Who are 'they'? Allard isn't finished, and it's quite clear the govt position is LP's only. So it's clearly not the federal government, and at this point legislatively they're the only ones holding the keys.
2nd - 'They are going to end the DG program'
They already have, so this isn't news.
3rd - 'Perhaps they are planning ahead for grandfathering DG licenses'
This is an outside possibility, but given HC's response to R v Smith if given the choice they'll drag their feet.
This sounds like a 'my dad's friend works at nintendo' type of thing
1st - Who are 'they'? Allard isn't finished, and it's quite clear the govt position is LP's only. So it's clearly not the federal government, and at this point legislatively they're the only ones holding the keys.
2nd - 'They are going to end the DG program'
They already have, so this isn't news.
3rd - 'Perhaps they are planning ahead for grandfathering DG licenses'
This is an outside possibility, but given HC's response to R v Smith if given the choice they'll drag their feet.
This sounds like a 'my dad's friend works at nintendo' type of thing
redi jedi
Well-Known Member
Maybe HC is taking a look at the score card and is already preparing for their defeat? They were pretty dam quick to respond to the Smith decision.Yeah this basically sounds like BS.
1st - Who are 'they'? Allard isn't finished, and it's quite clear the govt position is LP's only. So it's clearly not the federal government, and at this point legislatively they're the only ones holding the keys.
2nd - 'They are going to end the DG program'
They already have, so this isn't news.
3rd - 'Perhaps they are planning ahead for grandfathering DG licenses'
This is an outside possibility, but given HC's response to R v Smith if given the choice they'll drag their feet.
This sounds like a 'my dad's friend works at nintendo' type of thing
torontoke
Well-Known Member
Under the old system it would have been 20 per patient with a 5 g script.
So 200 for 10 patients.
But plant counts are sooo stupid.
A sog from seed yield of 200 vs a regular two month veg grow of 200 would be night and day but somehow be considered equal?
I really hope they figure out a better way to quantify plant to grams per day
So 200 for 10 patients.
But plant counts are sooo stupid.
A sog from seed yield of 200 vs a regular two month veg grow of 200 would be night and day but somehow be considered equal?
I really hope they figure out a better way to quantify plant to grams per day
redi jedi
Well-Known Member
Its real easy...limit the wattage
torontoke
Well-Known Member
Really you think x amount of light is equal to y amount of grams?
I dont know.
Consistency is a tuff to regulate.
There has to be a built in sliding scale.
redi jedi
Well-Known Member
Yes..its a much more realistic way to gauge production
torontoke
Well-Known Member
Oh dont get me wrong i totally agree.
Most of us will probably be dead and gone before any of this gets seriously discussed but at the same time id rather guess about these details than continue kicking lps like every other discussion turns to.
I just read the details of the colorado home grows because those are always raved about and i dont think they are even enough.
12 plants max per house regardless of adult numbers.f that
But the old mmar numbers are just as unrealistic
torontoke
Well-Known Member
I guess its a start. Certainly better than just throwing out plant numbers like they are all the same like jacks magic fukin beans.
Ive also read compelling argument about sq fottage/grams per day but its all so variable.